Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay over barack obama second term
Barack obama successes research paper
Essay over barack obama second term
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essay over barack obama second term
As President Obama began his second term as president of the United States, expectations are soaring amongst the American people. Many second term presidents have found that their second term has left them with more of a burden then acceptance from the public. Though there is a chance for peril, some have experienced notable success during their second term in office. Many presidents experience both pros and cons during their second terms, but do Americans remember the cons more than the pros? Adam Clymer of the New York Times, is the author of the excerpt “Triumphant Obama Faces New Foe in ‘Second-Term curse’ “ notes the positives and the negatives of a second term in office, as President Obama will begin his second term he faces the possibility …show more content…
of danger within his presidency. Clymer noted the historical patterns of second term presidential failures since Frank Delano Roosevelt was in office. Clymer also notes that many presidents have experienced success in their second term of office, he recalls president Dwight Eisenhower’s handling of the Little Rock Nine situation in Arkansas in 1957 also recalls the success and popularity of president Ronald Regan during the economic boom of the 1980s.Clymer used a historical approach when he analyzed presidents terms. He believes that Obama has a chance to have success in his second term in office. Clymer is correct because every president stages events and solves differently. Based on their handling of issues, they will establish whether their presidency is a negative or positive one (Cannon, Colman & Mayer p.230-232). One thing that Clymer failed to mention is that Obama, a rather unpopular president is more likely to fall victim TO the curse, his inability to be effective in congress and take charge will certainly affect him down the road. News Editor Tim Cavanaugh of the magazine Reason described in his article “Beware Obama’s Big Ideas” how he thinks that President Obama’s re-election and “public appeal” will lead him to push his agenda more aggressively in his second term. The author a clear Libertarian believes that the president’s first term blunders such as health care, deficit, and the war will lead him to make irrational decisions during his second term, since he is unable to make the majority of the American people happy. Cavanaugh beliefs that Obamas executive decisions will lead him to give the American people more government and less freedom rather than more freedom and less government (Cannon, Colman & Mayer 233-235). One con that Cavanaugh brings to the table is that his editorial is much more biased as he analyzed the negatives of Obamas presidency; contrary to popular belief he has succeeded with attempting to reform health insurance and Wall Street in order to save jobs and give all U.S citizens affordable healthcare. Akhil Reed Amar an author of “Second Chances” takes a more neutral approach, as he believes that a second term could be a possibility for both disaster and promise.
He recalls recent presidential terms with former presidents of the 19th and 20th centuries such as Dwight D. Eisenhower, Richard Nixon, Bill Clinton, and George Bush, 43rd as he incorporated the “second-term curse” of their respective terms. For Bush, he explains how his opponents made their ways into congress; for Clinton it was his impeachment because of the Lewinsky affair; for Nixon it was resignation due to the major Watergate scandal; and for Reagan it was his involvement with the Iran-Contra affair. He does look at one positive feature that Obama brings to his second term, his youth. President Obama is only in his 50s as he explains that Obama could potentially be an affective political force in the second term. Key issues that Obama should focus on are immigration reform and social security benefits in order to beat the dreaded “second –term curse” (Cannon, Colman & Mayer p235-238). Amar did not mentioned the mid-term elections of 2014, This proved to be an unpopular presidency. Although his term is only halfway completed. The republican people proved that the American public is rather unhappy with a democratic …show more content…
president. I agree with Adam Clymer of the New York Times because I agree that not all second term presidents suffer from the “second-term curse”.
One great example that he used is that of Eisenhower achieve notable success in his second term and so did Ronald Regan, who had a near complete electoral sweep when he defeated rival Walter Mondale in the 1984 U.S Presidential Election, as he only lost in McGovern’s home state of Minnesota. The reason why I believe that president’s suffer during their second term is because the American people remember failures more easily then achievements (Wayne p. 323-324). With Obamas second term ending in 2017, I am not able to fully analyze his second term. I feel like Clymer had the most rational approach, the American people are as helpful to a president as critical. Campaigns like re-elections promise the American public something better. Americans are naturally fascinated with elections, a re-election provides Obama with a leadership image, I believe that the “second-term curse” could be broken but Obama needs to sound decisive with current mainstream political issues such as immigration, same-sex, and the
economy. As editor Lawrence Summers of the Washington Post explained in his news article “Ending presidents second-term curse” that every president including Obama is expected to beat the curse. As he had a rather unpopular first term, he could now learn from certain mistakes in order to make the second term a better one (Summers). It is important to note that most presidents do suffer from a second term disaster, but it will be up to Obama and how he handles policies, issues, and how he performs in D.C. Overall, I feel that Obama has a fair chance to have a successful second term. He needs to really touch on the issues that are currently mainstream, if he is able to improve his approval ratings in order for his political party to thrive in the upcoming election and leave office the way he came in with a bang.
Stephen Skowronek writes about political time and how one can determine the legacy a president will leave behind at the time their presidency is done. The president has immense powers when he comes to office, but the challenges they each face vary depending on the time they take office. Skowronek analyzes and demonstrates that the most essential factor for a president to attempt to legitimize his actions and orders will be the actions of the president before him. Following the actions of George W. Bush is how we can determine where Barack Obama falls under and follow the chain to the next president. If Hillary Clinton were to win the 2016 election, she would fall under the politics of articulation and Barack Obama would fall under the politics of pre-emption.
Examining the conceptualizations and theories of Neustadt and Skowronek’s in comparative perspective, this essay makes the principal argument that both of these theories only represent partial explanations of how success and efficiency is achieved in the context of the Presidency. With Neustadt focusing saliently on the President’s micro-level elite interactions and with Skowronek adopting a far more populist and public opinion-based framework, both only serve to explain some atomistic facets of the Presidency. As such, neither is truly collectively exhaustive, or mutually exclusive of the other, in accounting for the facets of the Presidency in either a modern day or historical analytical framework. Rather, they can best be viewed as complementary theories germane to explaining different facets of the Presidency, and the different strengths and weaknesses of specific Administrations throughout history.
The U.S. president is a person deemed to be the most fitting person to lead this country through thick and thin. It’s been such a successful method that it has led to 43 individual men being put in charge of running this country. However, this doesn’t mean that each one has been good or hasn’t had an issue they couldn’t resolve when in office. But no matter what, each one has left a very unique imprint on the history and evolution of this nation. However when two are compared against one another, some rather surprising similarities may be found. Even better, is what happens when two presidents are compared and they are from the same political party but separated by a large numbers of years between them. In doing this, not only do we see the difference between the two but the interesting evolution of political idea in one party.
Presidential power has become a hot topic in the media the in recent years. There has been extensive debate about what a president should be able to do, especially without the involvement of Congress and the American people. While this debate has become more publicized since the Bush administration, similar issues of presidential power date back to Truman and the Korean War. As with much of the structure of the U.S. government, the powers of the president are constantly evolving with the times and the executives.
Meacham discusses the upcoming elections to show the reader the power is in their own hands. Throughout the article he explains the President’s intentions in their election. He concludes the presidential talk stating, ”… both men will talk about the American Dream, but no single politician can restore the faith of our fathers and mothers. That 's up to all of us.” The President elected cannot restore America himself; the people must also place themselves in the best circumstance for
Rick Santorum’s departure heralded the beginning of the general election. Mitt Romney, with the backing of the Republican establishment, and the growing support of the base, can now devote his resources for a one on one showdown against President Barack Obama. Recent polls indicate that he is behind by only a few points in a head to head match-up against the President. High employment rate, skyrocketing gas prices, ballooning national debt, and an exhausting war in Afghanistan created animosity against the President’s administration. Therefore, the President must decisively address these issues in the months ahead to ensure reelection. He must pull the jobless rate below 8%, and lower the price of fuel. The President must not prolong the war in Afghanistan and must not escalate tension with Iran. In essence, a President seeking reelection will need to embody Niccolo Machiavelli’s acumen and Desiderius Erasmus’ deferential image. Now, I will outline what the President must do to handily beat Romney.
Because of the controversial issues surrounding President G.W. Bush before and during the time of his reelection, the acceptance speech that he delivered is an important piece of literature to study. This diplomatic speech is a piece of rhetorical contribution because the motives and meanings behind any President’s speech is significant to us as citizens of the United States of America. It further warrants our attention because if the audience is able to comprehend the inner meanings and motives behind a presidential speech, then they will eventually be able to differentiate the actual stances and platforms of future presidential candidates and nominees.
The president has a significant amount of power; however, this power is not unlimited, as it is kept in check by both the judicial and legislative branches. The president is held responsible for passing legislation that will improve the lives of everyday Americans, even though he shares his legislative powers with Congress. The sharing of power acts as an impediment to the president’s ability to pass legislation quickly and in the form it was originally conceived. However, Americans do not take this into account when judging a president, as they fully expect him to fulfill all of the promises he makes during his campaign. By making promises to pass monumental legislation once elected without mentioning that Congress stands as an obstacle that must be hurdled first, the president creates unrealistic expectations of what he can fulfill during his time in office (Jenkins-Smith, Silva, and Waterman, 2005). A president is expected to have the characteristics that will allow him to efficiently and effectively lead the nation and to accomplish the goals he set during his campaign (Jenkins-Smith et al., 2005). There have been a handful of presidents that have been immortalized as the ideal person to lead the United States and if a president does not live up to these lofty expectations the American public will inevitably be disappointed. Since every president is expected to accomplish great things during his presidency, he is forced to created and project a favorable image through unrealistic promises. The combination of preconceived ideas of the perfect president and the various promises made by presidential candidates during their campaign create unrealistic expectations of the president by the American public.
In presidency, character is everything. Born on February 6, 1911, Ronald Reagan, “Dutch,” never knew that he would grow up to be famous. He served two terms as governor of California, but before that he starred in Hollywood films. Originally a liberal Democrat, Reagan ran for the U.S. presidency as a conservative Republican and won, his term beginning in 1980. Ronald Reagan became the oldest President elected when he took office as the 40th President of the United States. He was also the first U.S. president after Dwight D. Eisenhower to get re-elected and finish two complete terms in office. Reagan was president from January 20, 1981 to January 20, 1989. He was an effective president, measured by his popularity and by his influence on history. This former U.S. president is given rightful credit for three large historic gains during his presidency: First, he won the Cold War without firing a shot, then, he revived the American economy that resulted in substantial growth and lastly, he restored the traditional spirit of can-do optimism to the American people who in the late 1970's were dispirited. These three historic proceedings successfully improved American prosperity and peace through strength, elevating Reagan’s presidency to that of American exceptionalism.
The presidency of the United Sates of America has been an evolving office since the term of our first president, George Washington. This evolution has occurred because of the changing times and the evolution of society itself, but also because of the actions of the men who have become president. Starting in the 20th century, most have referred to the presidency as the modern presidency due to changes in both a president's power and the way that the office itself is viewed. As the office of the president has evolved so has who can become president evolved. Yet, even today there are certain individuals who because of their gender or race have yet to hold the office of the presidency. The men that have been president in our modern era have all had faults and greatness, some having more of one than of the other. The modern presidency is an office that many aspire to, but that few hold. The evolution of the office of the presidency has been one from that of a traditional role to that of a modern role that is forever evolving.
Richard E. Neustadt, the author of Presidential Power, addresses the politics of leadership and how the citizens of the United States rate the performance of the president's term. We measure his leadership by saying that he is either "weak or "strong" and Neustadt argues that we have the right to do so, because his office has become the focal point of politics and policy in our political system. Neustadt brings to light three main points: how we measure the president, his strategy of presidential influence, and how to study them both. Today we deal with the President himself and his influence on government action. The president now includes about 2000 men and women, the president is only one of them, but his performance can not be measured without focusing on himself.
The American Presidency is undoubtedly one of the most widely recognized popular icons throughout the world. Although to most foreigners or those who have never resided in the United States or know little of its history, the executive branch of government may seem to be as dull and unyielding as the rest of the American politics, for those few rare individuals who have taken the time to examine and closely scrutinize this office of the American political system and its recent history, quite the opposite will be said. Unlike Congressional or local elections where typically a number of individuals of the same ideological background must be elected in order for a particular issue to be addressed by the government, when it comes to the presidency, one person, although checked by various other divisions of the same government, has the power and responsibility to literally, as history has proven, change the world. The American people, "like all people everywhere, want to have our (political) cake and eat it too. We want a lot of leadership, but we are notoriously lousy followers" (Genovese). In other words the expectations the public has of the executive office are ever-changing since we demand that our leaders keep up with the evolving world around us and them. Throughout the past seventy eventful years alone, the American people's views, perceptions and demands of the Executive Office of American government have evolved simultaneously with the political and social events of that same time period.
Understanding and evaluating presidents’ performance often poses challenges for political experts. The nation votes one president at the time and each presidency faces different tests. The environments surrounding a presidency have a tremendous impact on the success and failure of that presidency. In addition, the president exercises his power through a check and balance system embody in the Constitution. As stated in (Collier 1959), the Constitution created a government of “separated institutions sharing power.” As a result, a president works with others institutions of the government to shape the nation’s agenda. Thus, determining a presidential performance becomes difficult, especially when it comes to comparing the performance among presidencies.
Have you ever watched the Presidential Inaugural Address? Well, you should because you can learn what the new president wants to do with the country you are living in. I analyzed Barack Obama and George Washington’s Inaugural Addresses. There were many differences and similarities between Barack Obama and George Washington’s that I will further explain in this essay. One difference was that Obama’s speech was about trust while Washington’s was about the citizens rights for the new nation. One similarity is that both speeches talked about what each person wanted to do as president. Barack Obama and George Washington's Inaugural Addresses made a big impact on the country.
When president Barack Obama first walked on the biggest stage in America eight years ago a lot of Americans did not trust his words of wisdom to carry, we the people to a better United States. On January 10, 2017 President Barack Obama walked back on that same big stage now known and loved by so many to give his last and final speech, his Farewell speech. All of the non believers were certainly awoken to the actions that were taken by president Barack Obama to achieve most of what he truly dedicated his life and career to. Obama worked hard to gain the love, respect and dedication by so many loyal americans today. It definitely was not an easy task to achieve, many trials and many errors. In this analysis I will state weather or not Obama’s