Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Nazi medical experiments
Medical experiments conducted by Nazi doctors
German medical testing on the Jews in WWII
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Nazi medical experiments
During World War II, the Nazi’s performed some very brutal experiments on the Jews in the concentration camps. The experiments performed could cause painful injuries or in most cases death. Many people have asked if it was ethical to use the Nazi data, many say it is ethical other don’t agree with them. The Nazi medical experiments have been a big controversy in the world since the experiments were discovered. Many people have debated over the use of them if they should be used to grow the medical field in numerous places , like hypothermia. Is using the Nazi data ethical or, unethical; and are the people that support using the data right or, are the people that say it is unethical to use the data right. To find out if it was ethical and how …show more content…
Dr. Benjamin Freedman, a bioethicist, stated, "We are talking of the use of the data, not participation in these heinous studies,not replication of atrocities. The wrongs perpetrated were monstrous; those wrongs are over and done. How could the provenance of the data serve to prohibit their use"(Dyal ). Dr. Benjamin Freedman is right we are not conducting the experiments again, we are only using the data to discover treatments and help people. We can not take back the suffering the Jews had to deal with but we can make their suffering worth something. In 1985, 1000 people died from exposure to the cold. Many doctors, researchers, and some US military members saved a lot lives using the data from the Nazi hypothermia experiments.(Moylan). Other reason we should use the data is that the data didn’t do the experiments it was just the outcome. That is why we should use the Nazi experiment …show more content…
Some researchers and doctors say that by using the data it will promote dishonorable medicine. And that we would be encouraging other doctors to conduct experiments to And by using the data it’s like people are supporting the way the Nazi researchers got the data. Many of the research can not be used because, Nazi researchers failed to put age, nutritious level, and the state of being of the victim was during the experiment. Dr. Jay Katz said “They're of no scientific value" (Dyal 15). Because when the Jews were experimented on they were very weak and usually sick. Sick and weak people do not have enough strength to battle a disease or withstand a drastic temperature changes. Most of the people in this country are healthy and have good nutrition. Also the Nazi doctors experimented mostly on kids that might have had undeveloped immune systems. Sick and weak people do not have enough strength to battle a disease or withstand a drastic temperature changes. That’s how the data can’t help us, so it is practically
"Medical Experiments ." 10 June 2013. United States Holocaust Memorial Museum . 18 March 2014 .
Another way to carry out such an experiment was to strap a naked victim to a stretcher and leave him outdoors during extreme winter temperatures.... ... middle of paper ... ... Doctors are expected to save lives, not take them.
the decade. The horrible experiments performed during the Holocaust were terrible they did serve a purpose.The freedom that the doctors had to explore the amazing human body resulted in information that still might be unknown to modern science.
Cohen, Baruch C. “Jewish Law-Articles.” Jewish Law-Articles (The Ethics of Using Medical Data from Nazi Experiments). Web. 17 Jan. 2014.
As the human species develops, medicine follows suit. Researchers look down medicinal avenues which promise a better life-- a longer life. However, red and blue paint cannot engender purple paint without proper mixing. Thus, health sciences cannot expand without thorough experimentation. The Nazis exemplified this concept of “thorough experimentation” with their cruel and inhumane medical experiments. The trials varied in nature and reason. Some of the “experiments had legitimate scientific purposes, though the methods that were used violated the canons of medical ethics. Others were racial in nature, designed to advance Nazi racial theories. [However,] Most were simply bad science.” (jewishvirtuallibrary.org). The medical experiments performed by the Nazis were vast and highly divergent, but they can generally be divided into three categories: racial experimentation, war-injury experimentation, and pharmaceutical testing.
"Nazi Medical Experimentation: The Ethics Of Using Medical Data From Nazi Experiments." The Ethics Of Using Medical Data From Nazi Experiments. N.p., n.d. Web. 09 Dec. 2013.
During world war 2, many jews were put in concentration camps. Some of which, were experimented on by the SS (stormfuhrer). These experiments were cruel, harsh, and performed on completely unwilling victims. Most of these experiments were performed with no numbing or pain killers. One of the most famous doctors to perform these was Dr. Josef Mengele. He did many experiments to try and find a way to sterilize the entire jewish race. What the SS did to the Jews during WW2 was unacceptable. There was no justification to what they did at all, even if some good did come out.
Lessons can be learned through experiments but at what cost? Steven Pinker, a experimental psychologist, once said, “If you give people literacy, bad ideas can be attacked and experiments tried, and lessons will accumulate.” This quote by Pinker gives a great idea what could happen when people get literate and conduct experiments that they will do to learn more. The Nazi’s wanted to learn more about the human body. During the Holocaust, the experiments that they performed were the most wicked and dehumanising crimes in history.
In 1835, Nathaniel Hawthorne published the tale of “Young Goodman Brown,” a tale that illustrates many configurations of symbolism used to leave the reader planting the pieces together through his characteristics of detail and imagery. Hawthorne’s prime analogy expressed throughout this tale is the loss of vulnerability and pureness when reaching maturity.
In modern society, animal experimentation has triggered a controversy; consequently, vast amount of protests have been initiated by the animal rights community. Although these organizations have successfully broadcasted their concerns toward animal experimentation, its application continues to survive. Sally Driscoll and Laura Finley inform that there remain fifty million to one-hundred million animals that experience testing or experimentation throughout the world on a yearly basis. But despite opposition, animal experimentation, the use of experiments on animals in order to observe the effects an unknown substance has on living creatures, serves multiple purposes. Those particular purposes are: research of the living body, the testing of
The dropping and the atomic bomb and the continued use of human subjects during scientific testing in the 20th century continues to be a controversial subject. It is because the actions carried out saved many lives and that those hurt were informed and volunteered that these methods were moral. It is because of the debate surrounding these actions that science has continued to evolve. From these earlier practices, more rigid experimental methods are enforced. These new regulations protect the patient and continue to ensure that those sacrificing their safety to aid others are not injured without fully understanding the risks involved. The modern world will continue to benefit from the actions taken by the United States during the 20th century.
This report is over human experiments conducted by various governments over several decades. The governments involved include, but are not limited to, the Nazis, the soviets and even America. Some of these experiments that were tested on these people were very disgusting and extremely cruel.
Looking beyond the Nuremberg Code and applying it to modern medical research ethics, there are many challenges that it poses. Many have argued that the Code tries to provide for all unforeseen events, which restricts the researcher by requiring him to anticipate every situation, demanding the impossible. The most important contribution of the Code is the first principle, which says that voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. The subject involved should have legal capacity to give consent, should have free power of choice, as well as sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the experiment. This restricts that populations upon which some experiment may be conducted, since many do not have “legal capacity”. For instance, studies of mental illness and children’s diseases have been curtailed because neither of these populations has the legal capacity to give consent. Another group of people, prisoners, are never really able to give voluntary consent since they might be enticed by financial rewards, special treatment, and the hope of early release in exchange for participating in the human experimentation projects. British biostatitcian Sir Austin Bradford Hill also questioned whether it was important to inform a research subject who was receiving a placebo since it does...
In December 1946, the War Crimes Tribunal at Nuremberg indicted 20 Nazi physicians and 3 administrators for their willing participation in carrying out the harmful research on unwilling human subjects. Thus, Nuremberg code was the first international code for the ethics to be followed during human subject research. It was permissible medical experiments implemented in August 1947. The code also provides few directives for clinical trials (3). Syphilis study at Tuskegee in 1974 was the most influential event that led to the HHS Policy for Protecti...
...to find out something when they use children. The Tuskegee experiment exhibit how cruel researcher can also be, and how racial society was in 1932. The experiments show what can happen without regulations. There should be values and regulations to guide research in these experiments. Concluding, some experiments have the tendency to destroy the lives of the humans that have been experimented on.