Pros And Cons Of Gamma Ray Imaging

648 Words2 Pages

Pros and cons of gamma ray imaging
Gamma imaging can obtain reliable porosity and saturation information in quite wide range of model size from couple centimeters to several meters. However designing a well calibrated system is a challenge and may take several days to achieve. Another concern is the acquisition time that can take up to one minute for capturing a single location with the plane size of 1 cm2. Therefore in bench scale scanning time will exceed hours and therefore studying steady state problems is impractical and presence of noises would be expected in the reconstructed model. Despite all these difficulties, the cost of running an experiment with this technology is relatively high compare to other available techniques.

2.3 Radio Waves
In terms of the electromagnetic spectrum, radio waves are slightly longer than infrared in the wide range of 10-2m to 105m, corresponding to frequencies from 300 GHz to as low as 3 kHz. The application of radio waves in imaging comes from the concept of nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR). NMR, a physical phenomenon utilized to investigate the molecular properties of matter with the use of the absorption of electromagnetic energy, is similar to VHF and UHF television broadcasts (60–1000 MHz) by the placing of atomic nuclei in a strong magnetic field. This concept can be implemented on many different scientific studies such as medical imaging. Since NMR does not have any harmful side effects on humans it has seen an increase in laboratory use. Commonly used NMR applications in contaminant transport imaging and environmental studies are discussed below.

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), magnetic resonance tomography (MRT), or nuclear magnetic resonance ima...

... middle of paper ...

...he pore space of a packed bed of glass beads as they dissolved into a flowing aqueous phase at the pore-scale. The same study was performed in different media such as estuarine sediments (Reeves and Chudek, 2001), silica gel (Zhang et al., 2002), rock fractures (Becker et al., 2003), and organic-rich soil cores (Simpson et al., 2007). In water and NAPL distributions, hydrocarbons such as fluorinated NAPLS have been used to distinguish NAPL from water and air and enhance the imaging contrast and quality. This idea has been implemented in evaluation of water and NAPL saturations in heterogeneous media (Zhang, 2006); and NAPL dissolution under water flushing (Zhang et al., 2007, 2008a). Another application of this technique is on evaluation of surfactant-enhanced remediation (Zhang et al., 2008b). Examples of results and images from these studies are shown in figure X.

Open Document