Transparency in GMO Labeling: A Historical Perspective

557 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Gmo persuasive

In 1935, Russian scientist Andrei Nikolaevitch Belozersky isolated DNA for the first time in human history. Naturally, this opened up a broad range of possibilities that scientists were eager to explore. Consequently, one of the most promising, albeit controversial, products emerged in 1994, when the U.S. Food and Drug Administration allowed for the sale and consumption of the Flavr Savr tomato, the first GMO. Since then, GMOs have received mixed reviews, and public sentiment is usually focused on individual studies magnified by the media. In response to large scale disagreement, the United Nations acting in coordination with the World Trade Organization, introduced the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety in 2003. In regard to GMOs, the protocol calls for producers of GMOs to indicate the use of said GMO and that the product is safe for consumption. However, the current model for transparency remains a bit opaque. The protocol solely requires labeling of GMO crops, ignoring the large number of goods produced using GMOs. …show more content…

Reasons for the ban include the following, destruction of rainforest would be required to find suitable land for large scale farming, Peru is home to thousands of unique products that would be devastated by GMO introduction, and, lastly, thousands of small-scale farmers would be displaced by monopolistic GMO producers. Furthermore, following the ban, organic product exports have grown by more than 50% per annum, illustrating the success of the embargo on the emerging economy. Yet, taking this into account, the reasons for Peru banning GMOs are specific to the nation, and Peru is not opposed to expanding and reforming policy regarding GMOs. Moreover, Peru looks to increase transparency, regulation, and efficiency of laws involving genetically modified

Show More
Related

  • The Pros And Cons Of GMO

    1119 Words  | 3 Pages

    Genetically modified? That alone should be a cause for alarm, and have you wondering, what exactly is in this that I am eating? Yet every day millions of American’s choose to load up on food filled with GMO’s, and not even know it. First we must understand what GMO’s are. GMO’s are any organism whose genetics has been altered using genetic engineering. We should not be tampering with nature, and should try to grow organically as much as possible. There has not been enough research on GMO’s to know the potential long term effects it can have on us, so this is why GMO’s should be banned.

    Read More

  • Persuasive Essay On Gmo Labeling

    1016 Words  | 3 Pages

    Do you know what you're really voting for? Iowan farmer Reg Clause suggests you may not in his column, “Say ‘no’ to GMO labeling.” Reminding readers that general election day has come, he attempts to convince us that a certain law should be voted against. The proposed legislation would mandate all foods that contain genetically modified organisms, also know as GMOs, to display a warning label on their packaging. He argues that this would be detrimental to the good name of these types of foods when they do not deserve to be shamed. I agree that the genetically engineered crops should not be labeled, but not because that would tarnish their name. However, the reasoning for my opinion comes from the perspective that it would not only be impractical

    Read More

  • GMO Labeling Essay

    1763 Words  | 4 Pages

    The technological advances are increasing each year, and electronics are not the only things upgraded. The food eaten in the United States has also been touched by science in the form of GMOs. Although GMOs have been in the US food industry for almost twenty years, consumers should have the right to know what is in our food with mandatory GMO labeling.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Genetically Modified Foods

    702 Words  | 2 Pages

    Genetically modified foods or GM foods are foods that have been changed to improve the size of the product and to progress the efficiency of food production. Genetic engineering can be done on both plants and animals and are processed to make the desired characteristics that are required for selling. Genetically modified food has become a controversial topic because people have different viewpoints on which type of food is better for their health. Many protests were created to ban genetically modified foods because of the harm that it caused to the people and the environment. Although people have different opinions towards this topic, there are numerous advantages and disadvantages in producing and consuming genetically modified foods.

    Read More

  • Gmo Pros And Cons

    780 Words  | 2 Pages

    You might have heard GMO thrown around by scientists or news stations before. It stands for genetically modified organism. This is a relatively new technology that has sparked a huge debate. Organisms are genetically modified by taking genes from one being and transferring them to another being in order to change the qualities of the resulting species. Now this seems like a very good thing, and in some ways it is, but it has some very serious consequences. When humans start to tamper with nature, trouble is never far away. The same is true for genetically modified foods and organisms.

    Read More

  • Argument Against GMO Labeling

    837 Words  | 2 Pages

    Until the government creates mandates for issuing labels on foods that contain genetically modified ingredients, there are measures that can be taken by common citizens and supporters of GMO labeling in order to keep Americans safe in the meantime. Since “study after study points to potential health risks” (“Whole Foods Market”), supporters need to raise awareness amongst the rest of society in order to generate a large group that can begin to press the government to create a law to handle the issue. It is in “the state’s interest [to] protect consumers from false or potentially misleading communication or prevent consumers from suffering unwitting harms” (Adler). Moreover, the government must be the one to put an official end to the lack of

    Read More

  • Transgenic Food, Myths vs. Realities.

    782 Words  | 2 Pages

    Experts say, “Unless you consume only certified organic foods […] you’ve almost certainly eaten foods containing ingredients whose genes have been tweaked […].” (Anonymous, 2013, p.4). This assertion proves that people is eating food with Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO’s), nevertheless they disown the consequences of its intake. The opinions in the scientific society are divided, however recent experiments let predict the possible effects that GM Food production and consumption generates in a global scale. Genetically Modified Foods should be banned because it generates a negative impact on humans’ health, affects the environment and harms the third world nations.

    Read More

  • What Is The Fall Of Argentina Essay

    644 Words  | 2 Pages

    ...to be resistant to the company's own Roundup herbicide This means that farmers are utterly dependent on Monsanto; a situation similar as with the United States. The biggest adversaries of GM soybeans are environmentalist. For example, floods are happening because of soya farming in the region of Santa Fe and Chaco where the Salado River begins. The deforestation and the low permeability of the soil used in soya farming contributed to more channeling more water into the river. On the other side, people claim that GM crops are required to fight hunger in poor and developing countries. Evidence shows otherwise. GM crops have increased the use of pesticides while increasing poverty. Over 170,000 famers have had to quit on their lands because they couldn’t compete with big GM farmers, thus leading to more poverty. Also, herbicides have introduced new health problems.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of The Cartagena Protocol

    1840 Words  | 4 Pages

    A significant change will be seen in the approach towards GMO regulation and approval. The improved agreement will end the basis on the precautionary principle, which served as the backbone for most of the Cartagena Protocol’s arguments. The focus will be more on experiments and research done on the safety of GMOs instead of on the pseudoscience taught by ‘well-meaning’ NGOs. Individual countries should have greater command over their own countries than the dominating and often interfering Western powers do. Each country must be able to craft its own policy towards GMOs without the manipulation of countries that deem themselves more advanced.

    Read More

  • The Genetically Modified Foods Controversy

    1350 Words  | 3 Pages

    Sheldon, Ian. “Food Principles: Regulating Genetically Modified Crops After The 2006 WTO Ruling.” Brown Journal Of World Affairs 14.1 (2007): 121-134.Academic Search Premier. Web. 2 Nov. 2011.

    Read More

  • What Are The Pros And Cons Of GMO

    906 Words  | 2 Pages

    Eating is extremely important, it is also important to eat healthy. Most Americans eat without any concerns; they are not questioning or researching what they are feeding themselves or their family. A lot of that has to do with their financial stability, not having the time to prepare a meal due to their time-consuming work schedule, also lack of knowledge and education on what they are consuming. In this bibliography, I will go over all three articles and explain what they are about.

    Read More

  • Negative Effects of GMOs

    846 Words  | 2 Pages

    ...M crops will escalate the cost of farming, causing many small farmers to potentially loose their businesses. As GMOs continue to affect human life and the environment, it should be mandatory for products to be labeled if they are genetically modified, thus giving consumers the right to make their own decision. With the list of health risks and environmental issues rising, the use of GMOs should be banned as a method to increase food supply and continue a natural approach to eliminate all risks.

    Read More

  • Pros and Cons of Genetically Modified Foods

    1288 Words  | 3 Pages

    The most wonderful activity a human being can experience is new flavors and foods. For example, the first time a person tastes a delicious juicy piece of prime rib or a delightful hamburger with cheese and ham, his world is never the same. However, since the beginning of the twentieth century, the production of food has been supplemented by science. This has triggered an angry dispute between the people who support the advances of biotechnology and people who love nature. In order to understand the controversy, we have to know the meaning of genetically modified foods. With new technological advances, scientists can modify seeds from a conventional seed to a high tech seed with shorter maturation times and resistance to dryness, cold and heat. This is possible with the implementation of new genes into the DNA of the conventional seed. Once these "transgenes" are transferred, they can create plants with better characteristics (Harris 164-165). The farmers love it not only because it guarantees a good production, but the cost is also reduced. On the other hand, organizations such as Greenpeace and Friends of Earth have campaigned against GMO (“Riesgos”) because they think that they are negatively affecting the earth (Gerdes 26). Both the advocates and the opponents of genetically modified foods have excellent arguments.

    Read More

  • Genetically Modified Food (GMOs): Annotated Bibliography

    2902 Words  | 6 Pages

    Genetically modified food’s, or GMOs, goal is to feed the world's malnourished and undernourished population. Exploring the positive side to GMOs paints a wondrous picture for our planet’s future, although careful steps must be taken to ensure that destruction of our ecosystems do not occur. When GMOs were first introduced into the consumer market they claimed that they would help eliminate the world’s food crisis by providing plants that produced more and were resistant to elemental impacts like droughts and bacterial contaminants, however, production isn’t the only cause for the world’s food crisis. Which is a cause for concern because the population on the earth is growing and our land and ways of agriculture will not be enough to feed everyone sufficiently. No simple solutions can be found or applied when there are so many lives involved. Those who are hungry and those who are over fed, alike, have to consider the consequences of Genetically Modified Organisms. Food should not be treated like a commodity it is a human necessity on the most basic of levels. When egos, hidden agendas, and personal gains are folded into people's food sources no one wins. As in many things of life, there is no true right way or wrong way to handle either of the arguments and so many factors are involved that a ‘simple’ solution is simply not an option.

    Read More

  • Genetically Modified Foods: The Answer to World Hunger

    1563 Words  | 4 Pages

    Genetically modified (GM) foods have become omnipresent over the past decade. They are a technological breakthrough that allows humans to manipulate and add foreign genes to crops to enhance desired traits, but they have also evolved into a controversial issue, especially for Third World countries. Some people believe that GM foods not only provide larger yields to feed hungry citizens in Third World countries, but they can also be a source of great nutritional value. For example, researchers have developed a strain of golden rice containing high amounts of vitamin A and numerous other vitamins and minerals. Additionally, GM crops are laced with herbicides and pesticides, and therefore reduce the need for chemical consumption. Opponents of GM foods claim that they pose a threat to the health of consumers and that these crops could eventually cross-pollinate in an unregulated fashion or lead to the growth of superweeds and superbugs resistant to the herbicides and pesticides woven into the genetic fiber of the crops. Developed nations should promote research and monitoring from an ethical point of view and financial assistance through philanthropic ventures in order to limit environmental and health risks. They should also make sure that limited cultural displacement will result from the introduction of GM crops and that instead, a better livelihood and well-being through collaboration will emerge. Hence, GM crops should be introduced only provided that the developed nations assume the ethical and financial responsibilities for the environmental, health, and social consequences that attend this new innovation.

    Read More

More about Transparency in GMO Labeling: A Historical Perspective

Open Document