Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Mars colonization 2040
Colonizing mars thesis
Space exploration not worth the cost
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Mars colonization 2040
Should NASA really risk innocent human lives to colonize Mars? A biology expert says ‘“Attempting to go mars would be a pricey, risky leap, and would be a waste of a great deal of money”’. Colonizing mars is a terrible idea because it’s extremely dangerous, it wouldn’t be comfortable, and finally there is no turning back. The first reason why we should not colonize Mars is because it would be extremely dangerous. One example of the many dangers on Mars is the constant dust storms. These dust storms sometimes get so intense they block out the sun. The dust could also get into their living quarters, and could damage valuable equipment. Another danger of Mars is lack of oxygen. If there was a tiny crack in an astronaut’s helmet, their helmet …show more content…
The ride to Mars alone is 6-8 months on a specific date, at a specific time every two years when the Earth aligns with Mars at its shortest distance. Once you travel to Mars there is not a lot to look forward to. First of all, you will be living on a huge rock. Second, until better supplies arrive the astronauts will be living in a pressurized balloon and the rocket they came in. Scientists say that the first people on Mars will only survive 68 days due to limited oxygen supplies. The final reason living on Mars would not be comfortable because there is no water. Water is key to good health. With no water people will become dehydrated, dizzy and have a very dry mouth.
The final reason humans should not colonize Mars is because there is no turning back! Going to Mars is most likely to cost several hundred billion dollars, so you are never going to see Earth again. Going to Mars means leaving behind everything and everyone love, because there is no turning back. On the other hand, being one of the first people on Mars would have some plus sides. One plus side is that person would be extremely famous. Another plus side of being one of the first people on Mars is living somewhere different than
Elon Musk, NASA, and Nikola Tesla have all incorporated the first steps into the plans for colonizing Mars. Nikola Tesla let out his ideas to colonize mars and now Elon Musk and NASA are currently in the lead of many in the race to colonize this planet. There are ideas to colonize other planets but Mars and the moon are closest to our accomplishments. In 2011 a project was launched known as Mars One. The founders of this project, Bas Lansdorp and Arno Wielders, launched an official idea to send one hundred people to mars for a permanent vacation by the year 2020. Sarah Cruddas from the CNN website says, “The journey itself is expected to take around seven months and recent MIT studies found that, should explorers succeed in landing, using current technology they would likely survive only 68 days.” Crudas goes on explaining how the volunteers are ready to take on any risks for scientific purposes. Mars One is requiring the winning applicants years of training and isolation before being able to set foot on a spaceship that takes them to mars. Later in Febuary 27, of the year 2013 another idea based around moving to mars was proposed by Dennis Tito known as “Inspiration Mars.” The initial plan for “Inspiration Mars” was to send a couple into Mars. They require large funds that were never met and Inspiration mars was called off. The founders of project one had a backup plan known as “Plan B” which
On May 25, 1961, Congress met in a joint session to hear the American president, John F. Kennedy, address them in a speech he referred to as a second State of the Union. In his speech, the young president geared America for a race that would send men to the moon. Kennedy challenged America to “take longer strides” and to take a “leading role in space achievement, which, in many ways, may hold the key to our future on earth” (Burrows 330-331). America rose to the challenge, and within a decade, Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin were walking on the moon, becoming the first of the human race to walk on a world besides our own. The giant strides of which Kennedy challenged us soon slowed to a crawl, however, and after a few more missions, America would not go back again, possibly for good. America would soon turn its attention to other earthly issues, and its moon program would become nothing more than a memory. This gives rise to an inevitable question: should humans return to the moon? This question has haunted us for years, continuously rising and then fading away again. In recent months, new discoveries have brought it to the forefront, and with these new discoveries, the answer becomes obvious: humans should once again set their sights for the heavens, and putting a civilian lunar base and colony on the moon should be our next step.
While Mars may seem like a good option for expanding the human race, mankind is not ready to go. Mars has too many risks that we need to further investigate before people are sent there. Laurie Vasquez, author of "Could Humans Actually Live on Mars?" Provides insight on the pros and cons of traveling the red planet: "Solar flares can represent short term hazards for crews heading to Mars and on the surface of the planet" (Vasquez). These hazards include increased exposure to radiation, resulting in possible neuron damage and an inevitable increased risk of cancer. While the effects can be lessened by current technology, the health risk is still too great to send people to Mars. While the red planet may seem like a good option for expanding
These early space missions excited most of the people in developed countries, but there were some problems. The Soviet Union had made it into space, and now President John F. Kennedy wanted to land on the moon first. President John F. Kennedy said, "I believe that this nation should commit itself to achieving
Mars is our next best hope in life on another planet. Because of science mankind can grow and harvest plants in the modified mars soil, make a thick warm atmosphere, and drink no frozen mars water. Mankind can grow and flourish more as a species with this idea of colonizing mars. With more scientific advancements we can colonize mars and we will colonize mars.
Should we colonize mars? In my opinion, we should. In case something happens to Earth, we should colonize Mars. Many people think that humans can’t survive on Mars without food or water but, by the time we get to Mars we may have the technology to either transporting food from Earth or be able to raise crops and animals on Mars.
In comparison, a trip to Mars would take 6 months. It would then take 19 months to wait for the planets to realign, and then 6 months for the return
The unknown creatures of the new territory could create potential health issues to humans. If humans are expose to diseases and comeback to Earth. The spread of bringing “deadly Martian microbes” a risk not worth taking back to human civilization is a risk… (Scientific America 2). Landing in an uncharted territory could be extremely thin and cold. This uncharted territories atmosphere is thin and cold it might react with the Martian microbes and make them more deadly or have a negative impact on the human body such as health risks of hypothermia.
There has long been interest in the exploration of Mars. More missions have been attempted to Mars than to any other place in solar system except the Moon, and half of the attempts failed. However, the early exploration attempts taught us many lessons that made subsequent missions more successful. Since 1995, Mars exploration has undergone a renaissance. NASA has successfully launched four orbiters and four landed missions. These missions provided data and images that changed our view of planet Mars. One of the more successful landed missions on Mars is the Mars Exploration Rover- Opportunity. Opportunity was launched in July 7, 2003 and landed on Mars on January 25, 2004.
...ost of what scientists know and need to know about the conditions of Mars is know from the Skylab, Mir and the International Space Station. Photovoltaic panels will power the living units on Mars. There are limitations to this mission because of the cost budget.
Before making decisions on space travel, the most vital thing to consider would be ethical issues that need to be dealt with. In world history, there has always been a moral dilemma on stepping onto and taking over other people’s land and property. One problem would be what “a fair process for commercializing or claiming property in space” (Source I) would be. During English colonialism, there was “the moral permissibility of settling on lands already occupied by the indigenous people of America or Amerindians.” (Source I) When traveling to space, people are stepping into a foreign land which they do not own. Although some may say that space and planets, as far as humans know, have no inhabitants that own it, there are no problems with people taking it over. Just because space and other planets are not inhabited, does not mean that humans deserve it or own it. Humans already “do not have a very good track record in protecting [their] planet home. [People] have expanded human presence into pristine forests resulting in the disruption of migratory routes, soil erosion, and species extinction.” (Source E) Who is to say, that what humans are causing on planet Earth will not affect “the outer reaches of the solar system?” (Source E) Diseases are brought back and forth between countries all the time, one su...
Humans can expect to face some major challenges on an expedition to Mars. It has been proven that humanity can travel in space for over two years. Cumulatively, Sergei Constantinovich Krikalev, a Russian cosmonaut, has spent over eight-hundred and three days in Earth orbit (Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center, 2005). The expedition to Mars would require the crew to endure a six month journey to the planet, a year of living on the planet, and a six months journey back to Earth. Russian cosmonaut, Valery V. Polyakoz, clocking in at four-hundred and thirty-eight days for just one stay in Earth orbit, shows humanity is capable of a twelve month round trip to Mars (Schwirtz, 2009). Earth's orbit has provided some benefits to space exploration, like the magnetic field from cosmic radiation, and the proximity to Earth if an emergency were to arise (Jones, 2009). The further humans travel away from Earth the greater the risks become. The major risks to human health on a flight to Mars, living on Mars, and returning to Earth are: radiation exposure, biological problems induced by weightlessness, spacecraft malfunctions, and psychological problems brought on by isolation.
... The problem with the gravity of Mars is that weightlessness can make you sick. Meaning that because humans are so adapted to the conditions here on Earth, such a drastic change will make them sick. Adaptation will have to occur, meaning that the stations on Mars might have to somehow mimic the conditions of Earth. Works Cited http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terraforming_of_Mars http://www.universetoday.com/9497/magnesium-could-be-a-source-of-fuel-on-mars/. http://www.mars-one.com/faq/health-and-ethics/will-the-astronauts-have-enough-water-food-and-oxygen.
Mars is a planet full of mysteries and wonders. Mars is such mystery to astronomers because of the craters and channels in the planet that may have once had water, or life. There have been missions to Mars, but not with humans. Astronomers have studied Mars enough to figure out the physical characteristics, the Composition and structure, and the moons of Mars.
The issue with establishing a space colony is that there is still a lot of time and research that is needed to be successful. Researchers at NASA speculate that we only have two options for space travel: inhabiting another planet or floating in constant orbit. Both options have their advantages and disadvantages, but there are also unknown factors that may make people weary of traveling outside their home. The biological effects a different gravitational force - or lack thereof, will have on our bodies. Traveling in constant orbit prohibits