Pros And Cons Of A Separate Air And Space Force

1049 Words3 Pages

POSITION PAPER ON DISBANDING THE AIR FORCE INTO A SEPARATE AIR FORCE AND SPACE FORCE 1. The purpose of this paper is to illustrate the need and inevitability of a separate Air and Space Force. It will conceptualize the technological benefits and implications that a separate Space Force could have. It will then discuss some of the perceived negative effects the separation of forces could have and review why this separation may not be necessary. It will culminate by discussing some of what the Air Force went through before separating from the Army, drawing comparisons to the debates concerning a separate Space Force. 2. Technology has long been a major deciding factor in armed conflict. Bronze and steel helped defeat the barbarians, the …show more content…

Proponents of keeping with a unified Air and Space Force would argue that space is simply an extension of air, and therefore the technologies would be best used to support the military where they already have shown strength and the ability to win. They view aerospace as a “seamless medium unconstrained by arbitrary divisions of the vertical dimension.”3 General Thomas White once wrote, “There is no division . . . between air and space. Air and space are an indivisible field of operations.”3 Current space technologies are essential for communication, surveillance, guidance, intelligence and the worldwide networking needed by the Air Force to complete its mission It has proven to be effective thus far. They work seamlessly together to accomplish their shared goals. The Air Force, Army, and the Navy work together and share the use of assets often, however proponents of a unified Air and Space Force fear that stripping the command of space assets from the Air Force would cripple the it’s ability to use GPS guided missiles and drones in the way it does today. The Air Force believes the centralized control of aerospace is the only logical way to achieve synergy between air and space commands. They believe air and space control will always have the need to be intertwined and one organization must encompass both, though the practice of joint command has already proven that separate branches working together is equally …show more content…

Under today’s command, the tools employed in space are specifically used as supporting assets for air and ground operations. Since the majority of space funds go to the Air Force, most assets are for the support of the Air Force mission and strategic bombing. This limited way of thinking will severely hinder the potential of space command. Before the Air Force had been established as an independent military branch from the Army, Giuio Douhet said the airplane could become a dominant force, but not until it was “freed from the fetters of ground commanders who did not understand [the] new invention.”4 Air Force driven command of space is running into the same limitations. Although space is a completely different medium than the atmosphere around Earth, because there is no immediately evident boundary between air and space, it is easy to understand why many treat it simply as an extension of air. However, unlike air, space is infinite and not confined to a close proximity to Earth. It is void of any substance, and it is not protected from cosmic radiation by an atmosphere like Earth’s. Operating in space also requires the application of a different set of physical laws and a different mentality of how it could be used.2 These differences lend credence to the theory that just as air power could not be fully developed under the doctrines and mindsets of a land-based military, a Space Force will not be able to reach its potential when constrained by the ideals of an

More about Pros And Cons Of A Separate Air And Space Force

Open Document