Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: What is justice
John Williams Cat Weiner Proper Allocation for College Scholarships Fairness is a principle that western society ingrains in its people. But what is fair when everyone cannot get the same treatment. Whether it is vaccinations, welfare, or in this case college scholarships, allocation must be used when there are not enough resources to go around. There are many ways to allocate resources, some working better than others. We must analyze all of the methods of allocation to determine what the most fair course of action is. One of the methods that could be used to determine who gets a college scholarship could be the lottery approach. Everyone who wants to get a scholarship could apply to the lottery program and then the winners would be picked. …show more content…
This could be done by giving the scholarships to those who request them first. In this scenario, it is not the fairest system because again, it does not account for merit or help any extra people get into this program. It could leave people in poorer areas at a disadvantage if they did not have the resources to call, or go claim the scholarship. This is another system of allocation that should not be used in an instance like this. A more appropriate method that could be utilized is the sickest first method. In this scenario it will be interpreted as the poorest first approach. It would work by giving those who are economically disadvantaged the scholarships. Again, merit is not considered, but it is different from the latter because in the long run it could give people the resources they need to rise out of poverty. Therefore this method would be more appropriate and would be considered just. Many people have argued that a younger first system of allocation is the fairest. In this case, it will be called the freshman first system. The scholarships could go to those who are going into their first year. If this were done, merit could be used to determine who gets the scholarship among the uprising freshman. This system is appropriate for scholarships, but some may criticize that it leaves out the …show more content…
Those who have more school left ahead of them (in terms of credits) would have a better chance of getting a scholarship. This would mean prioritizing students who are entering college for the first time with no transferrable credits (high school AP course credits for example). This would make getting a scholarship harder for second year students, and students that may have taken time off of school. This principle is not necessarily the most sensible or just in this application because students who are very close to finishing but don’t have the last bit of funds to, and students that may have taken time off for medical or other critical reasons and are looking to return to their studies are at a serious
In one particular article, the main character has $150,000 that she wanted to give as a scholarship to someone who was in need. Although she grew up poor as was not able to go to college, she wanted to make sure that someone who was like her when she was younger had the chance to get an education. All that she had besides the money she was gonna use for the scholarship was just enough to get
Before any student is accepted, every decision would be made through the lens of the “original position”. When in the original position, the admissions “...must decide once and for all what is to count among them as just and unjust” (Rawls 129), in order to determine what would make a good student at the school. This process would allow the school to fairly choose students to attend the school, regardless of class or race, because the school admissions only see if the student fits the criteria set by the original position. However, this process of selecting students runs into the problem of tuition. Some qualified students would be able to pay for the cost, while the others would not be able to. To accommodate for this, Rawls would have the school engage in economic inequalities “to the greatest benefit of the least advantaged…” (Rawls 131). This would mean that Rawls would encourage the school to use their financial capabilities ensure that every qualified student is able to attend the school, even if means using taxpayer money. By the end of the application period, all students that meet the school’s criteria will be offered admission with or without financial
Johnstone, Bruce. "Investing more equitably and efficiently in higher education, creating value for America." National Dialogue on Student Financial Aid (2003): 6-10. Print.
Frank, S., & Education Resource, S. (2012). Fair Student Funding and Other Reforms: Baltimore's Plan for Equity, Empowerment, Accountability and Improvement. Education Resource Strategies.
I believe a selection committee should choose the scholarship recipients. I believe that the committee should be comprised five members from various departments around campus. I believe the five members should be but not limited to the Multicultural Liaison (Josh Harvey), Director of Admission (Amy Hayes), Director of Rise^3 (Jessica Pincham-King), a professor and board Member.
Since scholarships are proposed and established by individuals or organizations, each has specific requirements that must be fulfilled. Your search for scholarships must be based on certain factors like your strengths and career. Scholarships can be classified depending on need, location, career and merit. Some of the most popular scholarship programs are as follows:
The idea of freedom and equal opportunity that America was built on has sadly been lost and replaced with a system of quality education only being accessible by the wealthy. In-state college tuition should be free for all students meeting admission requirements, allowing students from the full spectrum of economic backgrounds to have the same opportunity to receive the same education. The incidence of poverty in the U.S. is directly linked to educational level. When a college degree is earned, income levels rise (College Board). The best use of federal government anti-poverty funds is not another welfare or assistance program; it is to make college education affordable for everyone.
Students who are able to afford college take advantage of the free education, and in the end low- and middle class income individuals still struggle with the other impending costs, because college has costs beyond tuition. Continually, Catherine Hill argued in her article that colleges should ask students what they are willing to pay instead of “making it free for everyone.” She argues that only about ⅓ of full-time students actually pay for full college tuition, and “free college would disproportionately favor wealthy students without addressing underlying issues that prevent low- and middle-income students from graduating or excelling in higher education.” The inevitable attention to debt, but there are issues within the higher education system that go beyond
For many years now, advocates for giving out scholarships based only on financial need have been pushing to remove special abilities from the criteria to award the money. This proposed system is already in use in the form of financial aid. Scholarships were created to reward individuals who exhibited talent that would benefit the college. Therefore, the basis for giving scholarships should consist equally of scholastic achievement, athletic ability, and need. Scholarships are in place to reward special talents. They should remain separate from financial aid where the only determining factor is need.
The article is written by Matt Bruenig who is a writer primarily focused on economic and political issues that especially affect poverty and inequality system. This essay discusses the idea of free college in the U.S. Topics include the different definitions of “ free college” and various benefits for different class-based students which lead to the inequality of free college plan. The meaning of “free college” varies from one to another. Some believe that it is sponsoring tuition to zero, while others believe that it means not only sponsoring tuition to zero but also living grants. Since there are many different views toward the definition of free college, government may need to declare it clearly. The author also mentions about the lack of equality of free college plan is another problem. Many researches show that the free colleges plan benefits middle-class and higher-class students more than poor students. This is a current and
For this reason it is essential to eliminate funding inequalities all students deserve a high quality education especially in the low-income areas. Providing more money to these areas can reduce crime and gang activity, lower the teen birth rate, restore self-confidence, provide these students and opportunity to attend college, also break the cycle of poverty. The President “Race to the Top Program” is a start but more need to be done from the local and state level.
After declaring Obama's proposal, Gerard moves on to explaining how this would affect equality and make universities more affordable. Moreover, from the quotes "the department will look at outcomes including graduation rates, employment rates and salaries" and "Obama would like to reward colleges that earn good grades", the reader is presented with compelling evidence that this reform would not only subsidise cost-effective universities, but will also generally decrease tuition fees. By "grading" universities, the US government is able to efficiently allocate its limited resources to universities that spend their money effectively instead of squandering it on "dubious expenditure". Therefore, Gerard strikingly proclaims that cost-effective universities will not only make tuition affordable for the populace, but will, in addition, provide society with vital specialists that will aid economic growth and
It was shocking to see how financial aid system works for others. In her study, one of her students who is over 18 and under 24 still considered to be a dependent under parents income, even if they do not live in same household. I think if the student no longer lives with their parents then that should not apply to that individual. Some standard rules are not equal or fair because it doesn’t take into account
As colleges’ funds dry up, colleges must turn to the public to further support higher education. By raising state taxes, colleges can collect funds to help improve the school’s budgets. The state provides funds from the taxes for colleges to receive a certain amount for each student currently enrolled. All community and traditional four year colleges collect these funds in order to maintain the school’s budget. As reporter, Eric Kelderman states, “less than a third of colleges’ budget is based from state taxes”. The school’s budget is how colleges are able to provide academic support programs, an affordable intuition, and hire more counselors. Colleges must now depend on state taxes more than ever for public colleges. Without collecting more funds from state taxes, as author, Scott Carlson explains how Mr. Poshard explains to senators “our public universities are moving quickly toward becoming private universities…affordable only to those who have the economic wherewithal to them” (qtd. in.) Public colleges must be affordable to anyone who wishes to attend. If colleges lack to provide this to students, it can affect dropouts, a student’s ability focus, and cause stress. The problem of lack of funding is that colleges have insufficient funds. Therefore, the best possible solution for the problem of lack of funding would be increasing and collecting more funds from state taxes.
Paid participants were 30% more likely to register for a second semester than students who were not offered the supplemental financial aid. These students also earned more credits and were more likely to maintain an above C average. This result shows that cash incentives help students. In order for this system to work, the best students with A’s will need to receive sixty percent of the total money spent by students with bad grades and students with B’s will need to receive forty percent of the total money spent by students with bad grades.... ...