Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Challenges of professional ethics
Academic integrity and professional ethics
Academic integrity and professional ethics
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Challenges of professional ethics
One may consider the CEC Special Education Professional Practice Standards (CEC-SEPPS), the Georgia Code of Ethics for Educators (GCE), and the Professional and Behavior Dispositions Rubric (PBDR) of the State University of West Georgia, as three distinctively separate instruments, but inescapable connections lie between them. These connections lie primarily in the CEC Special Education Professional Practice Standards - 1.0 Teaching and Assessment, 3.0 Professional Development, and 4.0 Professional Colleagues standards along with the GCE standard 4-Honesty. These standards are echoed in the PBDR in the concerns of collaboration, professionalism and the belief that all can learn. Exemplifying compliance with these standards and concerns demonstrates the character of an educator and indicates his/her readiness to enter the teaching profession as a truly qualified educator. An educator that is concerned with collaboration, according to the PBDR, is one who “always participates as expected,” and “seeks to build collaboration with other professionals” (PBDR). The CEC Special Education Professional Practice Standards echoes this concern in standards 3.0 Professional Development and 4.0 Professional Colleagues. Both deal with a special educator’s willingness to collaborate with either “professional colleagues from other disciplines” (CEC-SEPPS 4.1), “colleagues from other agencies (CEC-SEPS 4.3),” or with “general and special education professional colleagues” (CEC-SEPPS 4.4). The CEC-SEPPS extends collaboration activities to participation “in systematic supervised field experiences for candidates in preparation programs” (CEC-SEPPS 3.5) and “as mentors to other special educators” (CEC- SEPPS 3.6) as well. The inherent message be... ... middle of paper ... ...concerns, and many others, delineated in the CEC Special Education Professional Practice Standards and the Georgia Code of Ethics for Educators, are echoed in the Professional Dispositions and Behaviors Rubric of the State University of West Georgia for Advanced Programs in Special education. These three instruments provide a framework to which candidates in preparation programs, teachers, and administrators can return for problem resolution, and professional growth and development. Not only does this framework house the concerns of collaboration, professionalism and the belief that all can learn, it also safeguards the integrity of the field of education, and ensures students will be able to receive an education in an environment that makes every effort to “respect the culture, dignity, and basic human rights of individuals with exceptionalities” (CEC-SEPPS 1.7).
Standard 1.1 discusses how special education teachers need to understand how language, culture, and family background influences the learning of students with exceptionalities. Standard 4.3 discusses how teachers should collaborate with other teachers and parents to use multiple types of assessment information in making decisions. Standard 5.5 discusses the transition plans they have to implement in collaboration with the students, families, and teachers. Standard 6.3 discusses how teachers understand that diversity is a part of families, cultures, and schools, and that they can interact with the delivery of special education services. Standard 7.0 discusses the collaborations that teachers need to start having with families, educators, and related service providers. 7.3 discusses the promotion of collaborations for the well-being of the individuals with exceptionalities. These standards show what the teacher is beginning to do with the families that have a child with
The field expert was Mrs. Brenda Williamson, who taught various grade levels and subjects for special education. Mrs. Williamson has been teaching for twenty years. Currently Mrs. Williamson is a principal in a private school. Mrs. Williamson was chosen for this interview because after working with her I have learned many strategies to enhance learning and classroom management.
Werts, M. G. (2002). Knowing what to expect Introducing pre-service teachers to IEP meetings. Teacher Education and Special Education, 25(4), 413-418.
Steve and I explored his feelings about having an IEP and in turn receiving special education courses. Throughout our sessions, Steve became visibly upset, often times expressing dislike towards other kids in special education. Furthermore, Steve was adamant about not needing “slower” classes than other high school students. In Brandell (2010), “A confrontation of resistance should be offered in the spirit of analytic inquiry, with the clear intent to engage the client’s curiosity and self-observation” (p. 248). In a relational working alliance, I challenged Steve in attempt to promote self-awareness. Awareness of the defenses he was embracing in order to deal with the stigma attached to special education labeling, defenses that were interfering with his academic success.
The CEC professional ethical principles are a guideline for professional special educators. Special educators have a special purpose endowed by the community and recognized by a professional credential. As such, special educators have a responsibility to be guided by their Ethical Principles and Professional Practice Standards (cec). The bottom line is this; professional special educators pledge to these principles and practice guidelines that define their professionalism and advance not only their success but the student’s and their families’ success as well. In regards to my own professional philosophy and goals, I find the following principles most meaningful.
what is right from wrong. Some professionals like Pilzmaker let greed overcome their moral character of doing good. Although they took an oath to protect and not cause harm to the population of clients they serve. As members of the professional profession, one should follow and abide by all code of conduct within that specific profession. As mentioned, the code of ethics states that all professionals must practice within their limits of their competence. Practicing within ones competence sets the foundation to avoid harm and exploitation to their clientele. Each professional should be able to evaluate their individual level of formal training which is considered the prerequisite for professional competence. Attorneys' Code of sets certain principles and rules of conduct which each individual attorneys should follow all times within their practice, when they are fulfilling their professional responsibilities to
Special educations is a challenging,demanding,and rewarding profession that betters others and society. In this career field it takes a special individual to adapt to the everyday challenges of disabilities and love all students. Although the career field is not rapidly growing but the need is ever growing.This career is of great importance and plays a crucial role in the future of many youth and their families .Even though this career field comes with many demands the reward of giving a child a brighter future and a place in society makes special education teacher very rewarding .
In the second article “The Call for Collaboration in Teacher Education,” written by Judith Winn and Linda Blanton written in 2005, it is evident that there is an urgent call for collaboration in teacher education. Winn and Blanton (2005) specifically discuss the connection between collaboration with general education and special education. Winn and Blanton (2005) argue that as the number of students struggling in school increase it is even more crucial for general education and special needs teacher come together and collaborate to enhance each individual students
As a law enforcement officer, my fundamental duty is to serve mankind; to safeguard lives and property; to protect the innocent against deception, the weak against oppression or intimidation, and the peaceful against violence or disorder; and to respect the constitutional rights of all men to liberty, equality and justice.
Collaboration between a general education teacher and a special education teacher is important to a student 's academic success inside the classroom. Students who require special services need general education teachers and special education teachers to be in sync on all matters education. This coordination by both teachers will give each student the best possible chance at a quality learning experience. Accomplish collaboration can be difficult because of varying reasons. Findings by Eccleston (2010) suggests that successful collaboration combines four traits. Those traits are being thoughtful, knowledgeable, compassionate, and having leadership skills (Eccleston, 2010). Even though both teachers have their own pedagogies, earnestly implementing
Prior to having the class of Professional Values and Ethics, I assumed I understood the basic concepts of what defines a professional who has competence of values and ethics. Nevertheless, by being enrolled in this course, I have gained great knowledge of which professional values and ethical principles must be held by a social worker, which I did not know before. Progressively in this class, by learning professional values and ethics, my motivation to succeed as an upcoming social worker has gotten stronger.
...ssues. Most of the participants had limited understanding of specific strategies that could be used to increase the success of the student with learning disabilities in the mathematics class. The second issue revealed was that teacher collaboration was the most valuable resource for the general education teacher, specifically special education teachers, aides, and school psychologists. The third issue was the inadequacy of pre-service and in-service training that teachers receive. The training the general education teacher receives is severely limited in addressing skills or strategies that are needed to teach all students (DeSimone & Pamar, 2006).
The controversial nature of special education makes it exciting and challenging. We would be worried (and we believe people with disabilities and their families would be worried too (if professionals in special education were suddenly in complete agreement on all important issues in the field. We should constantly strive to find better ways to provide education and related services for people with disabilities based on best evidence we can obtain ( Lloyd & Hallahan, 2007).In this endeavour, differences of opinion are inevitable. All children and young people with special educational needs or disabilities (SEND) should be able to reach their full potential in school. They should also be supported to make a successful transition into adulthood, whether into employment, further or higher education or training.
Homer, R.H., Carr, E.G., Halle, J., McGee, G., Odom, S., & Wolery, M., (2005). The Use of Single-Subject Research to Identify Evidence-Based Practice in Special Education. Exceptional Children, 71(2), 165-179.
Ethics, often referred to as morals or principles, are a set of self-instilled ideas that help us govern our sense of right and wrong. As soon as a person is born and starts having the ability to interact with others, they learn what kinds of actions are expectable, and which ones are not. They are starting the long journey of ethical enlightenment. I say long journey, because it will take a person’s entire infancy, childhood, adolescence, and early adulthood to have a fully developed sense of ethics.