Profession Of Legal Profession

3601 Words8 Pages

LEGAL PROFESSION IN INDIA: CONCEPTUALIZING THE PRINCIPLES OF ETHICS WITH A BRIEF HISTORY OF THE PROFESSION AND THE MODERN DEVELOPMENTS.

“The practice of law, In its Nature is the Noblest, And Most Beneficial to Mankind In its abuse and abasement Of most sordid Kind.”
- Lord Bolingbroke

Legal Profession has its roots established under the British rule in India. It all started from concept of “Vakils” who worked under the Hindu and Muslim Law to the modern concept of lawyers in India. Legal profession is one such profession which can change the fate of any nation and from being a mediocre and low prestige profession, it has grown in leaps and bounds throughout the history and now has carved out a niche for itself. The legal profession …show more content…

In V.C. Rangadurai v D. Gopalan Justice Sen observed that the relationship between advocate and his client is personal involving a highest personal trust and confidence. Advocate should not be considered as agent or servant of his client. He is more than that . There are certain cases in Indian legal history which made Bar to make rules for the advocate in respect towards his client one of such cases would be. Harish Chand Singh v S.N. Tripathi in which a senior advocate appointed his junior as the Mukhtars in consolidation case. He further misguided his junior and tried to dispose of the complainant’s property in the name of his father. When matter was brought before the court the court held the senior advocate guilty of his professional misconduct and further was suspended from his practice for two years. Therefore some of the duty of the advocate towards his client are discussed as follows. He is bound to accept the brief in the competent authority mentioned in the Section 30 of the Act to the fee consistent with his standings at bar and also the nature of case rule also laid down that in special circumstances he may refuse to accept the particular brief. But in S.J.Chaudhary v State(Delhi Administration) Supreme court held that or to be more precise made it clear that if an advocate accepts the brief of the criminal case he must attend the case day to day and if he not does so he would be held liable for the breach of his professional duty. Advocate shall not withdraw from the engagements if accepted by him without sufficient cause and sufficient notice given to the client and if any fee taken by him for the same and suppose in future he withdraws from the case he is bound to refund that part of fee which he has not earned. He should not accept the brief or appear in any case if he has a reason to

More about Profession Of Legal Profession

Open Document