Price Waterhouse Vs Hopkins Summary

277 Words1 Page

The authors begin the article with the “Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins (1989)” case. Where the “United States law recognizes the illegality of sex/gender stereotyping when it drives formal discrimination in employment.” (Leskinen) In this study the authors investigate whether such stereotyping, and intolerance for counter-stereo-typicality, also contributes in the different components combined to affects women’s risk in the work place of being harassed. By then using a test of 425 working women, the authors tested to see how “deviations from stereotypical femininity—masculine appearance, masculine-typed behaviors (aggression and self- reliance), and work in a masculine context “ were related to women’s experience of gender harassment. (Leskinen)

Open Document