Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Pros and cons of predatory pricing
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Pros and cons of predatory pricing
Price wars happens when companies continue to lower prices to undercut the competition. It can be used to increase revenue in the short term or as a long-term strategy to market share. This can be prevented though, through strategic price management, and thorough understanding of the competition, or even communication with competitors. However, it can most likely occur in an industry for various reasons such as:
a. Under what environmental conditions are price wars most likely to occur in an industry?
i. Bankruptcy: In order to have enough liquidity to survive, companies who are being forced into or near bankruptcy may be forced to reduce their prices to increase sales volume. ii. Competitors: It is always better to offer a new brand on the market instead of trying to match the prices of existing companies in that market. Nevertheless, some competitor would try to target a product and attempt to gain market share by
…show more content…
Predatory pricing: An entrepreneur who has enough wealth may deliberately try to price new or existing products in an attempt to topple existing businesses in that market. vi. Process Optimization: merchants may incline to lower prices rather than shut down or reduce output if they wish to maintain the economy of scale. vii. Product differentiation: Some products are, or at least are seen as, commodities. Because there is little to choose between brands, price is the main competing factor.
b. What are the implications of price wars for a company? The implication of price wars can be severe as companies would fight to make new products while dealing with the high prices associated with research and development (R&D) costs, which is a major challenge posed on firms that are competing to stay in the industry. Therefore, in the long run, companies who successfully manage to make the best product the best prices, will win the price war while pushing other companies out of the market.
c. How should a company try to deal with the threat of price
Adopting a strategy of differentiation makes firms provide products and services what are distinct in some way valued by customers.
Differentiation through distribution, including distribution via mail order or through internet shopping. For example u can buy Monster from Amazon.com.
In conclusion, when a company introduces a new product into the price-sensitive market, the competitors are expected to move in the market quickly. It is better for the company to apply penetration-pricing strategy, in order to obtain a large market share in a short period and also discourage competitors who plan on entering the market.
Porter identifies a few aspects in the text that can affect the market such as the number of competitors, rate of industry growth and the amount of fixed cost. When there are companies that are equal in size and there are limited amount of competitors, each of them is keeping a close an eye one another because if one makes a competitive move it will send a ripple effect throughout its competitors to make similar changes. On the other hand, if the growth rate of industries increases and competitors see that there is less profit or less cliental that can trigger price wars. A perfect example of this is the Arline Industry so many companies ranging from Delta to Southwest, all offering a wide range of prices. Price wars tend to happen because flights of all airlines have set schedules that regardless of how many people payed for the flight. That’s why we see today offering specials such as free bag check, snacks,
Monopolistic competition describes a market structure in which relatively many firms supplies a similar but differentiated product, with each firm having a limited degree of controls over price (Mastrianna, 2013). Monopolistic competition also definition with a large number of seller produces different products (Nordhaus and Samuelson, 2010). Monopolistic competition has many sellers to rival for the same group of customer.The major characteristic of monopolistic competition is product differentiation. Product differentiation means the product have either or imagined characteristics that identify the product as unique with their own brand of the product. For example, personal computers have different character such as speed, memory, hard disk, modem size and weight. Personal computers are differentiated sold; they can sell at slightly different prices in market (Nordhaus and Samuelson, 2010). A monopolistic competition is a free entry market. Firms can enter or exit the market without restriction until the economics profit were driven to zero on the market (Mankiw,
Purchasing decisions essentially revolve around price. Price is affected through market competition. Therefore, manufacturers control pricing on products as well as the amount of production produced to meet market demands. These decisions are influenced by the type of industry in which these organizations operate. Economists divide the market into four distinct market structures: pure competition, monopoly, oligopoly and monopolistic competition. This paper will differentiate among the various market structures, while identifying pricing and non-pricing strategies within each market structure.
Threat of substitutes in market as best quality is not always a priority for some customers as they are price sensitive.
Factors affecting the intensity of rivalry are: Number of firms – more firms will lead to increased competition. Fixed costs with high fixed costs as a percentage of total cost, companies must sell more products to cover those costs, increasing market competition. Product differentiation Products that are relatively the same will compete based on price. Brand identification can reduce rivalry. New Entrants One of the defining characteristics of competitive advantage is the industry's barrier to entry.
Predatory pricing “is alleged to occur when a firm sets a price for its product that is below some measure of cost and forfeits revenues in the short run to put competitors out of business” (Sheffet p.163-164). The reason firms take the short term loss is because they hope to drive out competitors and raise prices to monopolistic levels. By doing this, they covered their short term loss to make even greater profits in the long term than they would have by not using predatory tactics (Sheffert). Predatory pricing became illegal under Section 2 of the Sherman Act. It has remained one of the more difficult allegations for prosecutors to prove, due to the complexity of determining the company’s actual intent and whether or not it the strategy is competitive pricing. According to Areeda and Turner, there are three ways to determine if a firm is implementing predatory pricing. First, a price above marginal cost is presumed lawful; second, a price below marginal cost is considered unlawful, except when there is strong demand; and third, average variable cost is considered a good proxy for marginal cost. This is a reason predatory pricing is still important today. The courts must decide whether or not companies are engaging in competitive prices for the good of the consumers or are using predatory tactics for the good of their own company. The purpose of this paper is to focus on the current legislation regarding predatory pricing, determining when there is predation in an industry and the cause and effect relationship it has on an industry.
In today’s world, it’s hard to compete for accompany that don’t known well their competitors. It ‘s like walking blind into a fire. For instance, knowing a great deal on what a competitors is offering in term of products can help a company to differentiate it’s product and make it more appealing for the customers. If the competitor’s products have weakness, one could build a better product without the same weakness the competitor had and from there gain competitive advantage. Furthermore, knowing the price of the competition can allow one to set competitive prices as
Price wars have racked industry after industry in recent years: from personal computers to mobile phones, from fast-food restaurants to airlines, from grocery retailing to computer software, from beers to frozen diet dinners, from automobile tires to disposable diapers, from detergents to underwear. All too often, there are no winners and few healthy survivors. Price wars indeed represent one of the extreme forms of competitive interplay in the market place, causing great losses. On the one hand, firms take a blow in terms of ability to innovate, consumer equity, and margins; they may forego their competitive advantage, fall victim to substitutes, and even face bankruptcy. On the other hand, consumers, benefit from lower prices in the short run. In the long run, however, they may develop unrealistic reference prices and suffer from lower quality products in the long term. In a broader contest, society may suffer from suboptimal allocation of resources.
Pricing. Our product is priced lower than our competitors in our industry. Even though our competitors have a different kind of product compared to us.
There is increased competition- This is a consequence of capitalism. Increased competition leads to improvement in terms of quality and efficiency of production. It also leads to low prices of products in the market, as producers want to have a larger share of the consumer market. In a capitalistic perspective, businesses that produce high quality products at a low price enjoy a larger market share.
Oligopolies do not compete on prices. Price wars tend to lead to lower profits, leaving a little change to market shares. However, Oligopolies firms tend to charge reasonably premium prices but they compete through advertising and other promotional means. Existing companies are safe from new companies entering the market because barriers to entry to the market are high. For example, if products are heavily promoted and producers have a number of existing successful brands, it will be very costly and difficult for new firms to establish their own new brand in an oligopoly market.
...n the companies will have to decrease the price otherwise the product will not be sold at higher prices and the revenue would not be as large as companies would like to.