Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Analysis of obama's inaugural speech
President Obama's inauguration speech
Obama speech critique
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Analysis of obama's inaugural speech
President Obama’s Sunday night speech was about three-quarters of what the cynics and his critics expected. The lone bits of good news were the president’s belated acknowledgement that the Fort Hood shooting was terrorism – not “workplace violence” – and that he didn’t announce any new executive orders dealing with gun control. For starters, the optics of this speech were very strange – why stand in front of the desk in the Oval Office? Did he get poked or get makeup in his left eye right before he went on air? He seemed to be squinting. The only other time the president addressed the country on Sunday night, he announced the raid that killed Osama bin Laden. One expected something new, groundbreaking, or different. Instead, he offered the
The structure of a speech is how it is organized. In President Barack Obama’s address to the nation, the structure of his speech is organized into three parts: a sincere opening, the main point, and then a sincere closing. In the opening of his speech, President Obama offers condolences and is sincere to the situation at hand. As he progresses in his speech, he reaches his main point of the need for a more restricted gun control policy. In the body of his speech, he loses some sincerity and focuses on the present situation and how to resolve the issue. Then, he closes his speech the way he began it, by being sincere and reaching out to the ones who were suffering. This particular way of organizing his speech was effective in supporting his argument. By opening his speech in a sincere way, he caught the attention of anyone listening because of his kind words. After he had their attention, he addressed the need to come together as a nation and end the awful violence. Then he ended by offering comfort to families. This specific structure buries the more controversial topic of gun control which causes people to feel more sympathetic making them more willing to listen to his message even if they support the right to bear
Bush opens his speech by acknowledging the events of September 11, and those that lost the lives of loved ones and to those that gave their life trying to save others in the buildings. He appeals to those that remain strong by saying that, “These acts of mass murder were intended to frighten our nation into chaos and retreat. But they have failed. Our country is strong.” His use of pathos helps Bush to calm and control the public in order to keep the country together. This
Remarks by President Obama at the eulogy for the honorable Reverend Clementa Pinckney; A man who was killed when an another man rushed into a church in South Carolina and killed 9 people while they were immersed in an afternoon mass. President Obama created different appeals and feelings through the use of different Rhetorical Devices such as Logos, Ethos, and Pathos. The use of logos ethos and pathos help the president convey his central idea which is to ensure the people of South Carolina and the people of the United States that not only are they safe, but they will unite to take this opportunity to create a more united U.S. This will happen through the establishment of new gun reforms.
President Obama’s memorial speech following the Tuscan shooting carefully utilized the Aristotelian appeal of pathos, or emotional appeals through his word choice, which aligned him with the American people while still conveying a sense of authority, and his use of biblical allusions, which drew his audience together on the basis of shared ideologies. In his opening lines Obama shows his compassion for the victims and mourners of the shooting stating: “I have come here tonight as an American who, like all Americans, kneels to pray with you today, and will stand by you tomorrow.” With just this short statement Obama aligns himself with the American people, showing his empathy and comforting the people by saying “I will be here for you.” This
Fallacies mean a disappointment in thinking that renders a contention invalid. It isn't extraordinary compared to other things to utilize when attempting to demonstrate a point or win a contention. However, numerous people commit the error by utilizing them without acknowledging it. Numerous people and presidents are continually known over how well their addresses are given and thoroughly considered. In any case, fallacies have a tendency to show up significantly more in president addresses than you may suspect. For example, in this case, President Obama’s speech contains multiple Straw Man fallacies that aren’t recognized by others, unless read carefully.
After the terrorists attacks on September eleventh, President Bush had to prepare himself to address the nation with intensions to calm the United States citizens and give them some answers. The President had many speeches in the week after this happened and some words he used were not as concise as they could have been. These words and phrases are his attempts to comfort the United States people but only anger the terrorists he has declared war with. In a critique of Bushs speeches in the weeks after the tragedy, it is written, He called for revenge, called Osama bin Laden the prime suspect and asked for him dead or alive. (Max 1) Using such strong words gives an impression that Bush is overly confident and jumping to conclusions. Using revenge would imply retaliation and in result would come a war. Bush seems so sure that bin Laden is responsible when, still as of this day, he has no hard evidence. Asking for him dead or alive is probably the first threat he made. The only accomplishment Bush got out of making these accusations and threats was making the American people nervous. The citizens of the United States may not agree with the decisions he is making for the country. Bush needed another chance to redeem himself and comfort his people. A committee of speechwriters and George Bush spent time writing the speech that was given on September twentieth. In this speech, the President made more sense and brought his ideas together more clearly, with phrases and topics that would calm the citizens of the United States.
As much as it grieved Obama to present this speech, he knew he needed too. The country needed questions answered. They wanted to know if the shooter had been caught, what President Obama was doing about this shooting, and what Americans need to do about the situation. Obama was able to answer all of these questions.
President Barack Obama goal when giving this speech is to inform the Congress on the State of the Union. The primary message being delivered is to focus on the future and the four questions that he believed the country should answer regardless of the future presidents. The person delivering the speech is the 44th president Obama because according to the Article II, Section 2 of the United States Constitution the president must give the congress information on the State of the Union. Obama is the right person to be delivering the speech because he is the president and he knows what it is exactly that needs to be conveyed to the congress.
Throughout the nation catastrophes occur on a daily basis; however there are a few catastrophes that have taken national precedence and left a traumatized nation. Most usually these catastrophes are an act of terrorism. Michael Nelson (2010) describes the nature of such terrorism catastrophes as disconcerting, unanticipated and that unnerve “the country’s sense of safety and identity” (p. 20). When such “a traumatic event results in the death of civilians” and “calls the nation’s institutions or values into question” the nation as a whole looks to their leader, our president, to offer solace and calm through a responsive speech (Campbell and Jamieson, 2008, p. 102). In Presidents Creating the Presidency, (2008) the authors have labeled these speeches as a national eulogy in which they usually occur at the sight of the
It’s undeniably aggravating and sorrowful that this constantly occurs, and that President Obama’s constantly getting push back by the NRA and Congress. The idea that those against gun control continue to argue that more guns will make us safer when, in actuality, that just adds more guns to the equation. At the same time, he speaks to gun owners in a way to not make them feel like he’s patronizing to them, but suggesting that the NRA perhaps is not speaking with their interests in mind. Yet, the most pressing notion of this article is President Obama continues a message of change throughout his speech. That, while the NRA and Congress continue to not negotiate well with him, change will
In July 2004, Barak Obama then only a Senator from Illinois delivered speech entitled “The Audacity of Hope,” at the Fleet Center (now the TD Garden) in Boston, Massachusetts. The 2004 DNC Convention was the first held in Boston, “…My father got a scholarship to study in a magical place; America…” This line, from President Obama’s speech entitled “The Audacity of Hope,” builds up the thought that Mr. Obama is a result of 'The American Dream.' In any case, it may not be the model of the fantasy that is well-known to generally Americans.
As most people know our country has suffered from multiple terrorist events. One of the most tragic events would have to be on September 11, 2001 in my opinion. President George W. Bush made a speech regarding the terrorist attacked that happened on the World Trade Center in New York City. In President Bush speech he makes some really good strong points his speech is very effective. The presidential speech Bush made is known as 9/11 Address to the Nation President Bush talks about the deadly terrorist attack that happened on September 11, 2001. President Bush talks about the terrorist attack that left a lot of people scared that but at the same time it made America stronger. In his speech he also states how “Terrorist attacks can shake the foundations of our biggest buildings, but they cannot touch the foundation of America. (Paragraph 2)” Through out his speech he states that "A great people has been moved to defend a
After his 1991 graduation from Harvard Law School, Obama taught constitutional law at the University of Chicago Law School from 1992 to 2004.
The American people need to unite in order to be able to focus on other issues in the United States. Without solving this underlying problem first, solving other issues will be a hassle. Once this issue is solved, only then can we branch out and start to solve the other problems plaguing the United States such as a discord between race, crime, and terrorism. Rather than focusing so much on the differences between each race, the American people should learn how to respect each other’s differences. Obama’s and Trump’s speeches overlap on the issues of violence and crime that are plaguing the United States. However, for the rest of their speeches, they do not discuss the same subjects. Obama stays on the broad topic of unity between the people
Barack Obama began the first Wednesday after the attacks in the same way he began the first Monday, with a verbal assault on Republicans at a press conference on foreign soil. “We are not well served when in response to a terrorist attack we descend into fear and panic,” he said at a press conference in the Philippines. “We don’t make good decisions if it’s based on hysteria or an exaggeration of risks. The refugee debate is an example of us not being well served by some of the commentary taking place by officials