Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The morality of a lie
Kantian conception of duty for dutys sake
A two page paper on lying and integrity
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The morality of a lie
To what extent does one's ability to hide the truth and strategize make them more viable to thrive? When individuals hear about politicians and businessmen or bankers they think of corruption. Individuals consider most of these people of power to be liars. Generally individuals say such things as “they got to be in power by lying”. Lying when done right can get people things they want such as power and wealth. Receiving these two things give an individual more means to thrive in the society we live in. With wealth you can bend other people of power to give you power, or with power you can create means to make wealth. With these two things someone can become almost an unstoppable force leading individuals who have less ability than them. This essays purpose is to explain the extent on how lying can make an individual, more prosperous in our society. The ways of knowing this extended essay will target will be emotion, because emotions are what drives ethics and faith, because lying deals with people being faithful in other people and also how the individual lying puts faith in that their lie will work. The areas of knowledge this extended essay will touch will be Ethics, and (religious knowledge systems). SECTION NAME TBA According to Stanford there is no universally accepted definition of lying. The Oxford English Dictionary 1989 states that lying is “to make a false statement with the intention to deceive”. (Should state most accepted one??) In 1773 Isenberg defined lying as “A …show more content…
Kant also continues on to say that the concept of duty is inseparable from the concept of right. A duty is that which one being corresponds to the rights of another. Where are there are no rights, there are no duties. To tell the truth is this a duty: but it is a duty only in respect to one who has a right to the truth. But no one has a right to a truth which injures
According to Merriam-Webster’s dictionary, lying means to tell an account of an untrue event or give false information.
The people who claim that they do not lie are probably lying when they say it. Whether it is to deceive authority or just to play a joke on a friend, it is part of human nature to lie. In the novel The Great Gatsby written by F. Scott Fitzgerald, Jay Gatsby takes on a character of wealth and luxury. Gatsby wants to win back his love interest from five years ago, so he secretly becomes wealthy through owning an illegal drug business, using his abundance of money to impress her. In contrast, in Tobias Wolff’s “The Liar,” he tells a story of teenage James as he lies about his life to appear more fascinating. He lies not because he wants to, but because it comes naturally to him. Both stories convey people struggling to find the purpose of their
One common trait that is seen throughout all individuals, is that all of them lie or in some way deceive others or themselves. It is seen that people are constantly lying, whether it is the smallest lie or even the largest. No matter how much a person remains truthful throughout their life there is a point where he or she lies. It is inevitable to avoid, people lie to gain something, to come into power, or to even mask the truth that they do not want others to hear (Bhattacharjee 1). It is seen in the two articles “Why We Lie; We like to believe that a few bad apples spoil the virtuous bunch.
Richard Gunderman asks the question, "Isn 't there something inherently wrong with lying, and “in his article” Is Lying Bad for Us?" Similarly, Stephanie Ericsson states, "Sure I lie, but it doesn 't hurt anything. Or does it?" in her essay, "The Ways We Lie.” Both Gunderman and Ericsson hold strong opinions in regards to lying and they appeal to their audience by incorporating personal experiences as well as references to answer the questions that so many long to confirm.
Kant believes in developing a pure moral philosophy, a universal law, based on a priori concept of reasoning. A priori knowledge is the knowledge a person has before any experience. He also talks about a posteriori knowledge, which stands for the knowledge after experience. As a posteriori knowledge is depended on experiences, it cannot be considered in making a moral decision because it requires a general law. Kant also refuses to consider any kind of specific interests and circumstances in making a decision. Hence, lying is not an option, according to Kant, in making any kind of moral decision. He also emphasizes that consequences don't matter regardless of outcomes. Hence, the moral law is a general formula that is applicable in all situations. So, instead of commanding certain actions, Kant believes in expressing the principle that all the actions to make a decision should be undertaken with pure motives without consideration of the consequences. In other words, Kant is a stro...
Secondly, the possibility of the right to lie is refuted on the basis of virtue ethics, which maintains that lying is morally wrong though the argument or claim is less strict as compared to Kant’s statement. Virtue ethics generally provides a different approach to ethics by focusing on character development of individuals. As a result, virtue ethicists tend to look at what people should be with regards to their character rather than determining the right or wrong of a behavior simply on the basis of reason and desired and undesired behavior (Mazur par, 5). In this case, virtues are desirable characteristics of individuals that make them act in a specific way. According to virtue ethicists, being virtuous is regarded as being ethical because it is a reflection of the individual traits of fairness and striving towards accomplishment of human potential.
The article “Rejecting All Lies: Immanuel Kant by Sissela Bok also presents the same argument. Sissela Bok presents the ideas and viewpoints of Immanuel Kant, a German philosopher. Kant believed that lying was bad and that “truthfulness is statements which cannot be avoided is the formal duty of an individual to everyone, however great may be the disadvantage.” He believed lying was always bad no matter the situation. Kant said that lying “vitiates the source of law,” or makes the source of law weaker. Our whole purpose of the government is to serve justice and if everyone is lying in court, it gets harder to serve justice. The purpose of the government would not be fulfilled if people lie. According to Kant, lying also “harms the liar himself, by destroying his human dignity and making him more worthless even than a small thing.” Kant says lying makes the liar lose his or her pride and honor. And I think it probably makes the liar feel bad and makes them feel guilty. In the article “Teens Do their Share of Lying” by Loretta Ragsdell, a quote from Sabrina, a college freshman, takes about how she lied...
Often people think that telling lies will persuade the other party to comply with our preferred outcome, but that does not always work. Lies bring more consequences than benefits. The problem with lies is that they are lies; they are fabrications of the mind and does not hold any factual value, thus people tend to forget them, and leaving them more exposed to being caught. Lying in negotiations can come in various forms, but often comes in the form of fraudulent statements. A given statement may be defined as fraudulent when the speaker makes a knowing misrepresentation of a fact on which the victim accepts as true, and causes damage (Lim, 2011, pp. 171-178). If the liar is caught, the liar may be faced with possible criminal charges for falsification, or making false statements. The reputation of the liar would be significantly damaged and relationships would be twisted. Often, if one is caught lying, the trustworthiness of the liar would be severely diminished. The relationships between the liar and the other negotiating party would be damaged. In this case, lying would be considered as a breach in the relationship between the negotiating parties, as it is the cause that the relationship has gone sour. When a sense of mistrust develops, future negotiations would be very difficult, and or near impossible. This is very true in certain Asian countries like China. The Chinese put great emphasis than Americans and Europeans on respect and friendships (Lim, 2011, pp. 240-245), aspects of relationships in negotiations. Thus, if there was a breach in the relationship caused by lying, which leaves an impression of disrespect and unfriendliness, a favorable outcome from the negotiation would most likely be denied. Therefore, for any negot...
What are lies? A lie is defined as follows: To make a statement that one knows to be false, especially with the intent to deceive. There are several ways that lies are told for instance, there are white lies, lies of omission, bold faced lies, and lies of exaggeration. No matter what type of lie that one chooses to tell many people believe that lies do more harm than good.
The Lie, a dreaded horrible thing we tell to avoid the truth. Lies come in all shapes and sizes. Some lies are small to the point they are just omitting certain parts of the truth. Other lies are the secret lies, these lies can cause damage to trust between you and the person you tell it to. The worst of all the lies are the funniest kind of lies you look back on, they are the one you tell even though you been caught. With every word the punishment just gets worse, to the point of no return. Lies are the worst option to take in any scenario no matter how devastating the truth can be.
Can you remember the last time someone lied to you? Or how about the last time you lied to someone else? Did you ever stop and ask yourself why? There are so many different reasons that a person might lie. Maybe a lie about something to keep oneself out of trouble, or even a lie to impress other people. But either way there are always going to be serious consequences or effects of lying.
From the start of life we are taught not to lie. As life progresses we learn that honesty may not be the best policy. That is, if getting ahead in life is important. This idea is taught in many ways, one is by acting. Every time an actor/actress is on a set they portray a different character this is evidence that lying is fine as long as it is acting. Movies and plays support that maybe lying is not always bad. The thing is are the different or are they the same? Are we acting when we are lying? Or are we lying when we are acting?
I agree with the statement "honesty is the best policy". People will be able to trust people who are honest, liars will have rumors spread around about them, and it's just plain easier to tell the truth. Nobody likes people who lie all the time and won't know whether to trust them or not. People get annoyed by people who lie a lot.
"Honesty is the best policy," is a phrase many people still hear regularly. Most people tell their first lie when they are kids. Telling a lie is an exceptionally strange propensity because naturally everyone knows how to tell one. Mass numbers of individuals lie for various reasons that include the need to provide self-protection, the lie is oblivious to the liar, and to enhance another's feelings.
A story has numerous important effects in our daily lives. It has been one of the most effective source of inspiration know to man. In this I would like to tell you about the something which was taught to me in childhood. “Behavior” the word defined as “a person who was well treated to represents themselves to others. This thing is generally comes from our family; the one quote was I always remember “Telling a lie and boast may end up in trouble”. When I tell lie to someone this quote comes into my mind. I can still remember when I was six year old and whenever I had made any mischief by saying a lie to family, my grandmother used to tell this story in brief.