Power And Society Study Guide

1080 Words3 Pages

Erika Lozada
Professor Hageman
ZHON 194
2017 October 20
Exam 1- Midterm Question 1 Power is a fairly ambiguous term to define though many have taken on the challenge. One may attempt to define power by first looking at its sources: “charisma, legitimacy, wealth, confidence, support, resources, and prestige” (Notes, August 28th) among others. A person in power may hold one or all of these traits, but the result remains the same; those in power have the ability to manipulate material items or even whole societies for whatever reason they deem necessary.
In the sociology book Power and Society: An Introduction to the Social Sciences by Brigid Harrison she defines power as “the …show more content…

Harrison’s definition felt more like a means by which one may obtain power rather than the meaning of power itself. The ability to give and take resources may allow you to have power superficially, but what happens when a person no longer has those resources? What if a person gained power through other means? Harrison’s definition seems to bring about more questions than answers when it comes to what is power. Castell’s definition can be viewed as an extension of Harrison’s definition as they both hold the same ideology; power is rooted in being able to give and take from people. However, Castell explained how one may use reward and punishment to obtain power more extensively. I do agree that power is about being “the primary source of social structuration and dynamics” (Castell, 3), but it does so by exercising control. By using the term “transformative capacity” (Notes, August 28th) Giddens can be referring to any of the seven source of power listed above. A person is able to use control to influence people both superficially (ie. money) or socially (ie. government), but one may do this through more than just “production and distribution” (Castell, 2). The one problem I see with Giddens’s definition is the vagueness of his wording, but that is partially because power is such a broad term in itself. Harrison and Castell were able to do a better job of specifying how power is …show more content…

Social scientist use history to analyze the growth and change of modern society, the human psyche, and human development. History is “an unending dialogue between the present and the past” (Harrison 164) and is usually viewed through one of three perspectives: “the great man paradigm”, “the institutionalist perspective”, or “the elite theory” (Harrison 143). Throughout history we are able to see how societies seemed to continuously separate itself into groups depending on how the individual identified him/herself whether is was social class, race, religion, or government affiliations. Nevertheless, the majority of these identifiers have changed over time as the middle class expanded, African Americans gained civil rights, new religions emerged, and parties changed

Open Document