Postmomalism In Lydia Davis's 'Break It Down'

1199 Words3 Pages

Postmodernism could be looked at as a time in which all art forms were challenged. The basic rules that essentially set the groundwork for artistic expression prior to the postmodernist phase were no longer looked at as a necessity now that artists of all kinds took it upon themselves to go against the status quo. For example, according to Peter Barry, “melody and harmony were put aside in music; perspective and direct pictorial representation were abandoned in painting, in favor of degrees of abstraction; in architecture traditional forms and materials (pitched roofs, domes and columns, wood, stone, and bricks) were rejected in favor of plain geometrical forms, often executed in new materials like plate glass and concrete” (78-79). But when …show more content…

In her book entitled “Break It Down,” which is a collection of short stories, Davis is able to write with a minimalistic style. For example, specific details are often left out in exchange for more subtle hints regarding the overarching plot, theme, character motivations, etc. This ultimately allows readers to take a more active role in reading because they are, for all intents and purposes, being forced to “infer the deeper meaning of the story from what [they] are given” …show more content…

Instead, Davis opts for pronouns like “he” or “she,” as well as few other terms, to name characters. One can find this in stories such as “The Letter” and “Once a Very Stupid Man.” Some will even find characters named based on who they are in relation to other characters. In the aforementioned “The Mother,” the only two characters are the girl and the mother. One of the most interesting cases of there being a lack of actual names is in “Problem” where all of the characters are given letters as names, starting with the letter ‘T” and ending with ‘Z’ (Davis 154). The lack of names works to Davis’ benefit because it allows her to deliver a story without worrying about miniscule things such as names distracting the reader. In most cases, names are merely an extra detail that really adds nothing to the story itself. One could even argue that names are only ever put in stories to make it easier to follow. By replacing traditional names with other descriptive words, though, Davis is, in fact, minimalizing her stories and allowing the readers to focus on analyzing what is in front of them rather than worrying about names and

Open Document