Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
How does globalization influence consumer behavior
Government intervention in business
Effect of technology on the economy
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: How does globalization influence consumer behavior
Threat of New Entrants: MEDIUM The quantity of capital that is required to be part of the computer industry including the current established brands, economies of scale and access to distribution channels, makes barrier to entry relatively high. What it keeps raising the entry level is the way current companies enjoy the demand side attributes in which consumers prefer to purchase technological products from the biggest and most reliable companies. Nevertheless, some factors that make the entry barrier lower for small starting companies is the cost of client switch in which PCs are open systems that can be manufacturer by any third party company. Government does not restrict any type of the entry to the consumer technology market and the current big companies aren’t showing any defensive action against new companies. The Power of Suppliers: MEDIUM Most of the companies within the consumer technology industry rely on either manufacturing its own parts or buy different type of components from different distributors to build their product and sell it on the market. Although, one of the things that most computer manufacturers do not have is the ability to create one of the vital parts of a computer, the Central Processing Unit or also named known as a CPU. The only two suppliers that can provide the CPU required in every computer in the market are Intel and AMD in which Intel dominates around 65.3% of the market share followed by Qualcomm, Samsung, and then AMD with merely 6.4% of the market share. Although Qualcomm and Samsung are into the mobile device market, the domination that Intel has in the CPU market gives it a high bargaining power over other big tech companies. One of the most essential parts in building a computer i... ... middle of paper ... ...oks that is going the same trend in 2014. Also, the companies suffer from price competition meaning that the highly fixed cost of the industry makes competitors to produce in bigger quantities so they can sell it and distribute cost for more units. And when that happens, it forces competitors to reduce their prices close or equal to their mean cost. Stakeholders: LOW The current major stakeholders that are investing within the industry are environmentalist and e-waste companies in which there purpose is the dumping of a total of 47.4-million computers, 27.2 million televisions, and 141 million mobile devices annually into landfills. Programs such like these are collaboration with the big companies such as Hewlett-Packard, IBM, and Dell. Their purpose is to start up a computer-recycling program that will help recycle their products for a fee of $10 per item.
Rivalry among established firms is fierce. There are several factors that illustrate this: established market players (6.1). The product is highly standardized and the switching costs of the customers are low. Players are aggressive (6.2)
The existence of many large manufacturers in addition to the continuous entry by smaller manufacturers results in limited differentiation and decreased competitive advantage among PC manufacturers. All manufacturers have access to similar suppliers and therefore have the same buying power especially for processors which are sold at the same price to all manufacturers. It is clear that the competitive advantage in the PC industry is not sustainable as easy replication by competitors promotes price wars which lower profit margins for the industry as a whole. Ultimately, high competition and price fluctuations have led the PC industry to low profitability.
Most companies grew out of their perpetual search for profit and how to make that profit grow bigger each year and Bill Gates and Microsoft are certainly no exception to that rule. In fact, they are the personification of the rule! Such a determined search for ever-increasing profits has resulted in large, vertically integrated organizations. But it is essential to keep in mind the fact that economic growth does not end in profit accumulation. In the case of the computer and software industry, growth came in the form of reliance on external economies, that is, keeping apace with the technological progress of other companies in the same industry rather than each company going its own way. Microcomputer companies that remain active to this day are the ones that view computers as open ended machines, ready to be upgraded and improved from time to time, at pace with the current technology advances. Again, Microsoft presents the definitive example of such a company.
It is hard for new firms with a small market share to enter the oligopoly market and produce enough to make the product cheap for consumers to buy. The small amount of large firms can often produce large amounts of quantity to provide for all consumers to purchase. It is difficult for new firms to win market shares form existing producers, particularly if those firms have large advertising budgets, licenses, design patents or restrict access to raw materials on one way or another.
The PC industry is highly competitive and constantly changing as technology evolves and customer needs change. Some of the top competitors in the PC industry are IBM, Hewlett-Packard, Dell and Apple. Theses rivals are constantly jockeying for the top competitor’s position. They compete in prices, product innovation, advertising, etc.
Because the subject matter of strategic management is so inherently complex and because each one of us brings his own personal biases to the analysis, it was suggested early on that virtually all case material in the field be analyzed from the perspective of more than one methodology. Profit theory and industrial chains were selected as the first of a number of viable approaches to the analytical process. It would have been equally correct to select the Five Competitive Forces analysis refined by Michael Porter, one of the major figures in the field of strategic management. This methodology addresses the same issues but differs only in the language that they use to describe corporate behavior. The five forces are:
Electronic waste, or any waste for that matter is an inevitable part of an economic system where the destruction of an ecosystem is the primarily source of resources that are used to create the product. The waste that occurs from this process has to be disposed of in some way and more often than not, it is disposed of carelessly with out consideration to the affect it would have on the environment or the very people that create and let capitalism live on, “The political economy approach also defers progress on environmental issues to a pint after economic ones are solved” (Robbins et al. 2010, 114). And if this continues there may be no place left for the excess waste created by capitalism.
and forces firms to produce at the bottom of the long run average cost curve.
The first way is achieving a high turnover in service for example a restaurant that turns tables around very quickly, or an airline that turns around flights very fast. This approach means fixed costs are spread over a larger number of units of the product or service. This will result in a lower unit cost. Large businesses do this to create an entry barrier to prevent potential competitors from competing with their product. As they are unable to match the scale necessary to match the large firms low costs and prices.
According to Jim Wilkinson (2013), threat of new entrants refers to the threat of new competitors pose to existing competitors in an industry. For Panasonic, the threat of entry of new competitors into the technology industry is high due to the large scale of economies, such as Samsung, LG and Sony which have strong brand awareness over the years. This results in high entry barriers as large capital is required to purchase necessary equipment for setting up their company. Moreover, the creation of a brand identity that differentiates a product or service from the competition and encourages loyalty can help to create a barrier of others (The Open University 2007). Therefore, it is hard for the new competitors to enter into the technology industry.
Many consumers are computer illiterate and they just choose the computer that is the cheapest. Buy a computer is one of those situations that the old quote "you get what you pay for" is very true. When you buy a cheap computer you are getting generic parts and low quality parts at that. When hiring a person to build a computer you can tell them the quality of product you want in your computer. So that way, you actually get what you pay for and for a much less amount.
There is increased competition- This is a consequence of capitalism. Increased competition leads to improvement in terms of quality and efficiency of production. It also leads to low prices of products in the market, as producers want to have a larger share of the consumer market. In a capitalistic perspective, businesses that produce high quality products at a low price enjoy a larger market share.
A processor is the chip inside a computer which carries out of the functions of the computer at various speeds. There are many processors on the market today. The two most well known companies that make processors are Intel and AMD. Intel produces the Pentium chip, with the most recent version of the Pentium chip being the Pentium 3. Intel also produces the Celeron processor (Intel processors). AMD produces the Athlon processor and the Duron processor (AMD presents).
...n the companies will have to decrease the price otherwise the product will not be sold at higher prices and the revenue would not be as large as companies would like to.
Innovation is key to the success of ASUS. It focuses on speed-to-market, cost and service to succeed in the ultra-competitive IT industry. That is why every employee of ASUS strives to master the “ASUS Way of Total Quality Management” in order to fulfill the “Persistent Perfection” promise of the brand. Guided by these percepts, ASUS has developed a strong advantage in product design, technology, quality and value/cost. These advantage’s in turn constitute ASUS formula for success – allowing marketing to communicate these strengths to win consumers hearts.