Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Is overpopulation an environmental problem
Social problem of overpopulation
Social problem of overpopulation
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Is overpopulation an environmental problem
Until recently, the term “population growth” has always been regarded in a positive manner; still many people believe that a growing human population results in a growing economy. While many people debate whether a reduction in our total numbers is necessary, others debate what the effects would be. Not only does our population affect the economy, but also our environment, education, quality of life, and everything around us depends on how we react to this growing problem. Our population is growing and we must decide how we will react and what effects our actions will have.
Many researchers and writers have differing views on whether population reduction is necessary, Ozzie Zehner, author of “The Environmental Politics of Population and Overpopulation,” makes valid arguments using his own research into the field. Zehner states that the nonprofit Optimum Population Trust advocates for the reduction of human population to one and two billion people, allowing each inhabitant to live at a high standard of living. Although this claim seems drastic at first, Zehner defends why we need this extreme reduction through research into the effects of a growing population. He claims that our population is like a Ponzi scheme, whereby an increase in the number of children each generation is required to support the older generation, also most growth comes from developing countries. This is an interesting point that he makes because it appears true on the surface, and Ponzi schemes have negative connotations attached to them. Zehner believes that because of this a reduction in our population will not be so simple. He states that even if the global birth rate were to decrease from the current average of 2.6 children per couple to 2.1 children pe...
... middle of paper ...
...ovement of other non-direct issues. If we do not choose to solve this crisis voluntarily, then nature will do it for us, with a much more extreme and devastating outcome.
Works Cited
Ellis, Erle C. "Overpopulation is Not the Problem." New York Times: n. pag. 13 Sept. 2013. Web. 6 Sept. 2013.
Fougère, Maxime, and Marcel Mèrette. “Population Ageing and Economic Growth in Seven OECD Countires.” Economic Modelling 16.3 (1999). CrossRef. Web. 23 Oct. 2013.
Heinberg, Richard. "The Shrinking Pie: The End of ‘Development’?" Post Carbon Institute. Post Carbon Institute, 28 June 2011. Web. 6 Oct. 2013.
Scrivener, Leslie. "Alan Weisman Asks: Can We Voluntarily Reduce World Population Growth?" TheStar.com: n. pag. 4 Oct. 2013. Web. 12 Nov. 2013.
Zehner, Ozzie. "The Environmental Politics of Population and Overpopulation." Academia.edu. Academia.edu, n.d. Web. 12 Oct. 2013.
In, The Population Bomb by, Paul R Ehrlich, he explains the problem of population increase, and how there are people everywhere! The feeling of feeling over populated. He talks about how if there are more people then there is more food that needs to be produced then ate. He explains on the rich people becoming wealthier and the poor are going to be even poorer and there is going to be a starvation. Population is doubling every year and how our energy is turning into
Parfit, Derek (2004). “Overpopulation and the Quality of Life.” In J. Ryberg & T. Tännsjö (eds.), The Repugnant Conclusion. Kluwer Academic Publishers. 7-22.
Among the fears of many environmentalists is that of overpopulation. Acutely aware of the finite resources that the planet possesses and the limitations of renewable resources, there are concerns that the planet may soon reach its maximum caring capacity. Since the First Great Transition ten thousand years ago, the planet has experienced an astounding increase in population. Generations later, the planet is beginning to feel the effects of continual population expansion. Over the years, numerous methods have been proposed or adopted to ensure that the Earth will not exhaust its resources. One of the most frightening adapted solutions was the eugenics movement.
Garret Hardin’s “Tragedy of the Commons” is an article that identifies the nation’s current problems and predicaments that can’t be resolved through the use of technical solutions. Hardin’s work heavily focuses on overpopulation, a prominent and unceasing issue that significantly distorts and affects the stability of the Earth and the abundance of the planet’s resources. In his article, he mentioned some reasonable and important solutions to overpopulation, but he also explained its downside and how the said solutions may not be ideal and practical. “Tragedy of the Commons” revealed that the human population will continue to flourish and how it will be greatly detrimental to our society unless individuals get the education that they need and
Owens, James (nd). Is Limiting the Population Growth a key Factor in Protecting the Global Environment.
It is a known fact that the world population is increasing without bound; however, there is a debate if this increase is a good thing or if it will prove catastrophic. The article “The Tragedy of the Commons” by Garrett Hardin discusses how the ever-increasing world population will exhaust the world of its natural resources, and eliminate human’s capability for survival. On the other side of the argument is Julian L. Simon who wrote “More People, Greater Wealth, More Resources, Healthier Environment.” This article proposes the theory that with an increase in population, humans’s quality of life is amplified. One particular issue that they both mention and have drastically different views on is the future of agriculture and human’s ability to sustain it.
The human population growth rate is an alarming issue that brings with it irreversible consequences, that will likely effect the way of life for future generations to come. With the serious incline in population statistics comes catastrophic processes such as global warming and deforestation that have major ‘knock on’ ramifications. It’s issues such as these that need to be considered when we think about the growth of the human population, and we must take into account why these issues are occurring. We must also explore the options available to us that may assist in limiting the problems, or eliminating them all together, to provide a better place, not only for us in existence now, but also those who will walk this earth in the future decades and centuries to come.
This problem of population growth leads to a number of solutions that could have significant implications on the quality of life. Taking no action and allowing population to grow unchecked could possibly risk the entire human species if food or clean water were to become unavailable worldwide. Aiming for zero population growth would in theory maintain the existing quality of life since a stable population would not increase their use of resources. However not all resources are renewable, so scarcities could still occur with a fixed population size. In an extreme case permanent resource depletion under zero population growth could have the same extinction effect that unchecked growth can lead to. Despite the escalating risk of unchecked population growth, technological advances necessitated by the increase in population will at least maintain the quality of life and could possibly improve conditions.
It’s frustrating to think that many people—more than three billion—are not able to have the privileges we so easily overlook everyday. This overpopulation issue can only lead to negative outcomes such as lower life expectancies, increasing complications to supply resources (water, food, energy, housing), increases in infectious diseases, etc. By 2050 the population will have surpassed 9 billion and more and more individuals will have to deal with the overpopulation issue and many more people will have to suffer because of it. Food production is not evenly distributed globally, so developing countries are increasing their population while their food production is decreasing.
As many people are already aware, the earth is beginning to become overcrowded with an immense population, which will soon strip the earth of its resources. According to Vivien Cumming, who is a professional author for BBC.com, the United Nations predicted that Earth’s population “could reach 9.7 million people by the 2050s, and over 11 billion by 2100.” This is an extremely detrimental problem because the “planet is not expanding. There is only so much space on Earth, not to mention only so many resources - food, water, and energy - that can support a human population” (Cumming, Vivien). Furthermore, David Satterthwaite, a senior fellow at the International Institute for Environment and Development in London, reports that there is not enough resources “for everyone’s greed” (qtd.in “Earth - How many people can our planet really support?”).
Stancheva, Tina. "Effects of Overpopulation on the Environment." Human Nature, Technology & the Environment. Swarthmore College Environmental Studies, 6 June 2003. Web. 2 Mar. 2014.
One of the problems facing our world is population. It began about ten thousand years ago when the humans settled and began farming. The farming provides more food for the people thus making the population grow. Now we are about 6 billion in population and in a few years we will be around 10 to 11 billion. Therefore, our population will almost double in size. This means that we will need more food to support us. A study in 1986 by Peter Vitonesk, a Stanford biologist, showed that the humans are already consuming about 38.8 of what is possible for us to eat. Thus, if the population keeps increasing, the percentage will increase also, making us closer and closer to the biophysical limits. By studying the earth's capacity, Dr. Cornell, another biologist, believes that we are already crowded for this would. He believes that our world can only support two million people. Not only this, but population can cause complicated problems to the countries with very high population. These countries will need more schools to educate its people, they will need more hospitals and public health to take care of their people, and they will need more water and more soil for farming to feed all the people. In order to solve the population growth problem, the people should be educated. Once the people are educated they will be aware of the problems they ca...
An increase in human population can influence our economy. Some of the factors that are affected are unemployment, poverty and the restriction of economic expansion. When the population increases, the cost of health, education, and other areas of urban growth are affected. Unempl...
Environmentalism can head in a negative direction, which may result in population control and even anti-immigrant policies. Can the developing effort of ‘population integrity’ protect our world while recognizing birth morality? My stance is that we must include all possible solutions to controlling population, such as family planning and governmental involvement. In addition, discover solutions to use renewable resources and impede exhausting nonrenewable resources, as well as ways to tackle overconsumption to support our corrupt environment. Though several people see large, rapidly growing populations in developing regions as the primary culprit in environmental decline, we need to focus on the costly environmental outcomes of overconsumption among the gradually increasing populations of the developed nations.