Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Review paper on the holocaust and the catholic church
Why should the pope have done more during the holocaust
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Whether the Catholic Church was a bystander or rescuer during the Holocaust remains a controversial topic. The Holocaust was a time of desperation, leading to the massacre of 6 million Jews. This act of Horror was led by Germans Nazi Party leader, Adolf Hitler. Evidence suggests that the church, to an extent was a bystander, staying silent, not publicly condemning Hitler’s policies due to fear of retaliation (Pope Pius XII and the Holocaust.2017). However, the undisclosed actions taken by Pope Pius XII contributed to the liberating and rescuing of thousands of Jews. (Rescue-Holocaust Encyclopedia. 2017).
Although Hitler was a Roman Catholic, he rejected Christian beliefs. Hitler believed in constructive Christianity and freedom for every
He rejected pleas for help on the grounds of impartiality while at the same time made statements criticizing injustices in general. He did attempt to help the Jews, but some of his actions made no impact, Pope Pius helped raise the Gestapos ultimatum of 50 kilos of gold from the Jewish community in exchange for “ their safety” but, regrettably this payment did not prevent the roundup of Jews. Although Pope Pius XII didn’t publicly condemn Hitler he did speak out within the church. He protested against Hitler’s actions by issuing a letter in 1927 which was to be read in every catholic church, however there was no impact. (BBC - GCSE Bitesize 2014) In 1935, Pope Pius XII described the Nazis as “miserable plagiarists who dress up old errors with new tinsel.” (Pope Pius XII & the Holocaust", 1998). In 1942, there was speculation that Hitler would seek revenge on the papacy and attack the Vatican due to the Popes Christmas message in 1942 which censured the extermination of the Jews: “Mankind owes that vow to the hundreds of thousands of persons who, without any fault on their part, sometimes only because of their nationality or race, have been consigned to death or to a slow decline.” (Pope Pius XII,
Pope Pius XII knew that if he spoke out against Hitler then, the Nazis could be vindictive, causing violent retaliation aginst prisoners, resulting in more innocent lives to be taken. The political and diplomatic actions were seen as a weakness by Hitler which encouraged him and gave him the opportunity to continue his brutal policies towards Jews. Through his personal intervention hundreds upon thousands of Jews escaped deportation to German death camps. Three thousand Jews were shielded in Castel Gandolfo which was the site of the Popes summer residence which included private homes, hospitals and nursing institutions (10 People Who Saved Jews During World War Two. 2008). Under the Popes influence, 860 000 Jews were saved through Papal (Catholic) relief programs which was more than any organization, group or individual.
Therefore, the church, to an extent can be considered to have been a bystander during the holocaust however it was through Pope Pius XII integration of political pressure, careful but sustained reproval while maintaining an essential impartiality in war-torn Europe, as well as direct action through himself and the local church where possible hundreds of thousands of Jewish lives were
As a Christian, he felt like it was his duty to protect the Jews. He was so engaged in his faith that Lutz decided to help the Jews who surrounded his office everyday to seek for his protection. Lutz cared for many Jewish refugees in Hungary from many nations and Jews under British and Palestine interests. For example, his faith had already helped 10,0000 Jews emigrate to Palestine ("Carl Lutz," The International). The opened-heart he gained allowed him to save the Jews despite of his religion, country, and race. Even though he is a Christian, he sacrificed his life to save the Jews who had different practices and ideas from his. Although he is a Swiss and was from a different country, he knew the Nazis committed wrong, unlawful actions because life is valuable. As the same for the Jews, Christians had been persecuted for the past years and these persecutions killed both infant, young, and old people. God had hardened Lutz
Not even the most powerful Germans could keep up with the deaths of so many people, and to this day there is no single wartime document that contains the numbers of all the deaths during the Holocaust. Although people always look at the numbers of people that were directly killed throughout the Holocaust, there were so many more that were affected because of lost family. Assuming that 11 million people died in the Holocaust, and half of those people had a family of 3, 16.5 million people were affected by the Holocaust. Throughout the books and documentaries that we have watched, these key factors of hate and intolerance are overcome. The cause of the Holocaust was hate and intolerance, and many people fighting against it overcame this hate
On the night of Kristallnacht, many German citizens were bystanders, either out of fear or approval for what was happening. Another example of bystanders on this day were the firefighters. Although they cannot be considered perpetrators because they did not directly attack the Jews, they only prevented the fire from reaching non-Jewish properties. Through these actions, bystanders only affirm the perpetrators and fuel the fire. In some cases, like the firefighters, they are even more dangerous than the perpetrators by allowing the fire to reach Jewish properties.
During World War II, six million Jews were brutally massacred by Adolph Hitler's Nazi regime. Several authors have written about the actions of bystanders in the Holocaust. In a poem, "The Hangman," and an allegory, The Terrible Things, Maurice Odgen and Eve Bunting described how bystanders could cause problems through their inactions.
“To kill the Jews, the Nazis were willing to weaken their capacity to fight the war. The United States and its allies, however, were willing to attempt almost nothing to save them” (Pp 5). If we would have put half as much energy into loving the Jews as Hitler spent hating the Jews we could have made a great difference.
Elie Weisel once said this: “I know and I speak from experience, that even in the midst of darkness, it is possible to create light and share warmth with one another; that even on the edge of the abyss, it is possible to dream exalted dreams of compassion; that it is possible to be free and strengthen the ideals of freedom, even within prison walls; that even in exile, friendship becomes an anchor.” Compassion is not something that is easy to understand, or even easy to show sometimes. The Holocaust was a difficult time to comprehend: how could one man have so much power and hate towards a society of people that he started a genocide? There may never be the right emotional explanation to describe the disturbing events that happened during the Holocaust, but Elie Weisel was able to share his. His message was that compassion and friendship can refrain someone from sinking so deep into a dark sea like the Holocaust.
During the Holocaust the mass murder of jews was a worldwide tragedy and when a tragedy happens usually your first question is why? The two groups of devoted researchers for the Holocaust are split into the Intentionalist group and the Functionalist group. As said by Mimi-Cecilia Pascoe in Intentionalism and Functionalism: Explaining the Holocaust “The intentionalist position suffers greatly from a lack of adequate evidence, and consequently cannot prove Hitler’s intentions beyond reasonable doubt. On the other hand, the functionalist position is better able to compensate for the lack of evidence, and thus provides a more solid historical explanation for the Holocaust (Pascoe 1).” The on going argument of whether the Holocaust was intentional or a choice in the moment is the Intentionalist vs. Functionalist case and either side has many different ways of portraying their evidence on the topic; the arguments are both have convincing arguments but in
In the Summer of 1941, Adolf Hitler started exterminating Jews and other non-Aryans, as a part of his plan to create a perfect Germany and to carry out his ‘Final Solution’ to the ‘Jewish Question’. Before exterminating 6,000,000 Jewish people, Adolf Hitler had already performed several actions which singled out the Jew as an evil person and one who should be killed. In 1923, Hitler was caught while trying to overturn the Bavarian government and was imprisoned for 5 years. In prison, he wrote the famed autobiography, Mein Kampf, in which he stated his first publicly known anti-Semitic beliefs and his ‘Final Solution’ to the ‘Jewish Question’. While imprisoned, there was a worldwide depression as economic markets crashed worldwide. This would help Hitler because once out of prison he would use this to help gain power both for the Nazi’s and for himself politically by promising better things to come in the future. In 1933, while preaching in front of a large Nazi crowd, Hitler used the Jews as scapegoats for Germany’s loss in World War One. “If at the beginning of the War and during the War twelve or fifteen thousand of these Hebrew corrupters of the people had been held under poison gas, as happened to hundreds of thousands of our very best German workers in the field, the sacrifice of millions at the front would not have been in vain.'; Many people were upset at the loss, and blaming the Jews made many people anti-Semites. Once he was named chancellor in 1933, Hitler preached about creating a Germany for true German people and a more centralized Germany. This included eliminating those who were non-Aryans and/or non-German. He would later detail about what a true German was in the Nuremberg Laws. He stated that Jews were not really Germans but instead, they were non-Aryan, and they were malignant tumors.
He had a lot of authority in enacting what Hitler had told the Nazis to do. He was just about as responsible as Hitler was for killing all of those innocent people.
Tent, James F. In the Shadow of the Holocaust: Nazi Persecution of Jewish-Christian Germans. Kansas: University Press of Kansas, 2003.
When classifying the types of people involved in an event such as the Holocaust, three categorical groups can be distinguished. First, and easiest to asses are the perpetrators. This category includes people directly related to the horrors of the Holocaust. The second category encompasses victims; all of the people that were killed, discriminated against, or otherwise harmed by the perpetrators. The final category defines those who watched, witnessed, or were otherwise indirectly involved in the Holocaust, without being harmed by the perpetrators. By definition, bystanders could include entire countries or other groups who ignored or neglected the Holocaust (Vollhardt). A fourth category could be argued, and would include those who actively helped victims (Monroe). As far as nomenclature, rescuer or anti-perpetrator would well define this group.
The Holocaust, the mass killing of the Jewish people in Europe, is the largest genocide in history to this date. Over the course of the Holocaust nearly six million Jewish people were killed by the Nazi Party and Germany led by Adolf Hitler. There are multiple contributing factors to the Holocaust that made it so large in scope. Historians argue which of these factors were most significant. The most significant contributing factor is the source of the Holocaust, the reason it occurred. This source is Adolf Hitler and his hatred for Jewish people. In comparison to the choices of the Allies to not accept Jewish refugees and to not take direct military action to end the Holocaust, the most significant contributing factor of the Holocaust is that Adolf Hitler was able to easily rise to power with the support of the German people and rule Germany.
Hitler’s negative views on other races and religions started in his late teens. He was influenced by political tension and realized only the strongest of leaders could save society from confusion and disaster. In the first Great War, Hitler was on the front lines. During one of the battles he was a part of a gas attack that blinded him, hospitalizing him for weeks. When he was well, he was notified that Germany had lost the war. Because of this, he was emotionally destroyed and decided to go into politics. He strongly believed that Germany lost the war because of the Jews and communism. Adolf’s hatred for Jews and communists was so strong that he related to them as one word “jewishcommunism.” To him there wasn’t a difference they...
When World War 2 broke out in 1939, the United States of America was facing the dilemma of whether or not to intervene in the massacre known as the Holocaust. Some people believe that the United States did all they could to help the victims of the war. Some believe that America did hardly anything. But, there is stronger evidence pointing towards the fact that the United States did not do enough to stop the killing initiated by Adolf Hitler, the leader of the Nazi army.
...s of the Holocaust, the Allies held the Nuremberg Trials of 1945-46, which made the horrifying actions of the Nazis known all over. The Ally forces pressured Germany to create a homeland for those who suffered through the Holocaust. Over the decades that followed, ordinary Germans struggled with the Holocaust’s bitter legacy, as survivors and the families of victims tried to regain their property and wealth that was taking away during the Holocaust. In 1953, the German government made payments to individual Jews and to the Jewish people as a way of apologizing for the crimes which were committed by the German people.