Polonius Act 1 Analysis Essay

1122 Words3 Pages

Scene two begins with Polonius discussing to Reynaldo, a hired servant, to spy on his son Laertes. Yet, Polonius means of spying takes drastic measures. As revealed through their conversation, Polonius intends Reynaldo to “lay slight sullies on my son” (II.i.45). In other words, Polonius wants Reynaldo to spread rumors about his son. Obviously, this is absurd coming from a father, even Reynaldo mentions it, “would dishonor him” (II.i.30). Hence this sheds light on the motif of honor and duty since Polonius is ruining Larter's reputation in order to gain information. However Polonius declares his idea as, “a fetch of wit” (II.i.46) and ignores Reynaldo’s advise. As they continue through their conversation, Polonius express a metaphor by comparing the spreading of rumors to catching fish. …show more content…

This idea reveals the character of Polonius since he will go through corrupt ways to receive what he wants. Yet it's ironic how Polonius intends to use lying as a way of bring forth truth. The mentioning of “by indirections find directions out” is again the reference to use lies to uncover truths. Hamlet’s conversation between Polonius reveals his enmity towards this character. The scene begins by Polonius accompanying Hamlet after devising a plan with the king to figure out why he has gone insane. However, what Polonius, and majority of the characters in the play, do not realize is Hamlet’s pretending. This was established when Hamlet claims, “I hereafter shall put an antic disposition” (I.v.191-192). As the scene proceeds Polonius asks, “Do you know me, my lord?” (II.ii.189-190) which Hamlet replies, “You are a fishmonger”. In other words, Hamlet is degrading Polonius. The term fishmonger has two

Open Document