Politics of Montserrat
The political history of the island of Montserrat has been characterized by instability for much of the time between its discovery and the present-day. First claimed by Spain, and then by Great Britain, Montserrat was a Crown Colony before transitioning to its current status as a United Kingdom Overseas Territory (UKOT). With a wide range of concerns regarding the issue of independence, the inhabitants of Montserrat remain unsure of their ability to maintain their own economic development and survive without financial assistance from the United Kingdom.
The first Europeans to spot Montserrat did so on 10 November 1493, as Columbus’ ship sailed from Guadeloupe towards Hispaniola. Though he named the island, Columbus and the Spanish took little interest in Montserrat, and nothing more was written about the island by a European until July 1631. At that time, Amerindians were using the island, though perhaps not living there, and no Europeans had settled Montserrat. However, only two-and-a-half years later, in January 1634, another written account describes Montserrat as having been settled by Irish Catholics.
The British, Dutch, and French had begun to claim some of the smaller islands in the Caribbean despite Spanish protests, claiming that the Spanish had no investments in the smaller islands of the Lesser Antilles, and that they belonged to whomever could “effectively occupy” them. This policy of Effective Occupation legitimized the settlement of Montserrat, and other islands, by the British. The first settlers of Montserrat were most likely Irish Catholics from St. Kitts (which was also claimed by Britain) who arrived there in 1632.
By the 1650s, English and Anglo-Irish landowners formed the wealthy ruling class, and Irish indentured servants formed the bulk of the population. This hierarchy was similar to that which existed in Ireland at the time. The English government ruled Ireland, and only a few elite Anglo-Irish could participate in politics and government. Similarly, only the wealthiest English and Anglo-Irish landowners on Montserrat had any control in the governance of the island, and the Crown maintained ultimate control.
Many of the first Irish Catholic settlers came from Virginia, New England, and the British Isles.
During the seventeenth century, there was an immigration movement and several settlers from different areas settled in the Appalachians. Many of the settlers were 3Anglo-Celtic, English, Welsh and Irish. They originally settled in the east and slowly moved westward due to larger more powerful landowners forcing them out and into the mountains.
Throughout the history of America people have been immigrating to America from multiple countries. People have arrived from all over Eastern and Western Europe, Asia and many other places. One country that people had immigrated from was Ireland. The Irish settled into America because of the Anti-Catholic Penal Laws in 1790. Most of the Irish were Catholic so they fled to America. The Irish also came to America because of a summer with constant rain and little sun that in turn destroyed their popular crops. Pushing this further, the Irish came to America because of the Potato Famine. Lastly, the Irish came back to America because of Hart-Cellar Act. This Act
The first thing that we will look at is the Irish demographics. The Irish population had fluctuated tremendously over the years. When looking at where they came from, the highest group seems to have been coming from Dublin and Nothern Ireland, along with Kerry County, Ireland as well. Previous to the the 1840's, there were two other waves of Irish immigration in the US. According to the Colombia Guide to Irish American History, the first of the Irish immigrants came in the 1500's due to Sir Walter Raleigh's expedition and the population has continued to grow even since. The third wave began in the 1840's. From census data from US during the Gilded Age, in the 1860's the total number of Irish born immigrants were 22,926. Throughout this time, until around 1910, that number decreased. The number of I...
In Canadian history, nationalism and sovereignty tend to be common themes prevalent since Confederation. A well-known example of this in Quebec was during the Quiet Revolution which strengthened the need for change through Premier Lesage’s reforms and in turn, developed a strong sense of nationalism in Quebec. In contrast to beliefs that the rapid modernization of the Quiet Revolution had a positive impact on Quebec, it rather had a negative impact on Quebec and its citizens and identity. The three consequences which arose in Quebec as a result of the revolution are the encouragement of separatism, the elimination of traditional values and roles and the establishment of powerful bureaucratic control. Quebec’s attempt to be more like the rest of Canada and to protect French Canadian identity unleashed a new form of nationalism, capable of threatening Canada’s unity and destroying Quebec itself, as witnessed during the Quiet Revolution.
This friendly attitude towards the natives did not last long. There was a settlement left on the island of Hispaniola, after the first voyage, called Navidad. The settlers were supposed to be cementing relations and trading with the natives. On the night of November 27, 1493, when Columbus was on his second voyage back to visit this colony, he was met with only silence. All that was found were the ashes of the town and the remains of the settlers bodies (Dor-Ner 206-207).
Unlike the well-defined social classes of England, the colonies had a streamline class structure, which gave individuals the chance to rise on the social latter. New settlers living on the coast could become rich by fishing and selling what they caught. If fishing was not a settler's strong point, then they could try their hand at farming. Getting the land to farm on was the easy part. The 'head right' system gave each male 50 acres, and 50 acres to each indentured servant he might bring over. England could not do this because England so defined the social classes and they did not have enough land that they could give to every male and his indentured servant.
Sigmund Freud’s theory on the unconscious and conscious includes two parts of the mind. The unconscious mind includes biological instincts, mainly aggression. A person does not know what is stored in the unconscious mind. It contains disturbing material, too threatening for the person to acknowledge. The thoughts in the unconscious mind are kept buried under conscious thoughts. The conscious part of the mind includes awareness and what the person feels. Freud compares the unconscious and conscious parts of the mind to an iceberg, the tip of the iceberg as the conscious mind and the part beneath the surface as the unconscious mind. The unconscious mind is hidden beneath the water, and the conscious mind is what little part can be seen. Shelley uses Victor Frankenstein as the conscious part of the mind, and the Wretch as the unconscious part of the mind of an unnamed character in Frankenstein.
The construction of the pipeline will allow to transport large amount of barrels of oil all throughout the United States each day. As Adam Kelsey states in his report a few viewpoints from President Trump. He said that the transportation of the oil barrels throughout the US is a “vital energy infrastructure”. On January 24, 2017 Trump said “great construction jobs”, this will increase jobs for many workers. In addition to the construction jobs, there will be an increase in job for steelworkers. “We build the pipelines, we want to build the pipe, going to put a lot of workers, lot of steelworkers back to work”, says
My first reason on why this will not benefiet Canada is because it can affect underground and water supplies, increase air pollution, and harm wildlife (FAQs: Keystone XL Oil Pipeline Project). According to CBC News, environmental activists, are concerned that is could affect surface water supplies. This would happen, because they will need to dig down, and bring the pipe through, it will have to go through dirt, and if the pipeline was to leak, it would enter our natural water supplies, and poison our water. Which will not be beneficial for Canada. It will also destroy natural habitats of animals, and harm them.
Dolan P shows "Between 1850 and 1930, about 5 million Germans immigrated to the United States with a peak in the years between 1881 and 1885, when a million Germans left Germany and settled mostly in the Midwest. Between 1820 and 1930, 3.5 million British and 4.5 million Irish entered America. Before 1845 most Irish immigrants were Protestants. After 1845, Irish Catholics began arriving in large...
The need for energy and resources pertaining to the United States is an inevitable concept that has caused much confusion and debate, especially over the last several years with the economy struggling to thrive. There are many ways to solving this problem of confusion, but perhaps the most debated at this point and time is the decision whether or not to build the Keystone Pipeline XL. The Keystone Pipeline would solve many of these problems and bring economical peace to the United States through distribution and refining of the oil. Even though there are many hesitations about the completion of the Keystone XL pipeline, it should be built because it would create new economic growth, make the United States less dependent
The Dakota Access Pipeline, already rejected once, is now causing uproar from people protesting its construction. What is so bad about this pipeline that it is on its way to getting rejected twice? The pipeline not only carries oil, but also brings risks to the land and the people living there. Keeping this in mind, the government moved the original route of the oil pipeline and passes the burden of the risks onto Native Americans living near the area.
He didn’t have the easiest home life as he was growing up. His father was abusive. Jones become involved in church early on in his life, becoming a student pastor in the Methodist Church as a young man. He became disappointed and dissatisfied with the Methodist Church when they wouldn’t allow blacks to participate in the church services. He broke off from the Methodist Church and started his church, which eventually came to be known as People’s Temple. People of all races were encouraged to become members, with human freedom and equality being preached on a regular basis. People’s Temple started soup kitchens, housing for the elderly, and provided job assistance. Jones’ church made great strides in caring for his community and opening its doors to people of all races. One could look back on his church and see some of the great things that he was doing. Even on a moral level, Jones seemed to be doing pretty well. However, he began to stray from a seemingly solid moral foundation early on as he used some dishonest tactics to gain and retain members of his church. One of his most infamous tactics was to use fake healing rituals to manipulate viewers into believing it was real and join the People’s Temple. As investigations began to look into what he was doing, he moved the People’s Temple to California (Cults,
Dittmann states that Jones used techniques such as compliance, conformity, and obedience training to brainwash his followers (2013). Jones would force his followers to tell him their biggest fears; in return, he would use that information against them if they ever disobeyed him. In Jonestown, Jones would require his followers to give him thanks daily, brainwashing them into believing he was their savior (Dittmann, 2013). Because Jones was a mastermind at manipulation, it is understandable why so many people would follow him and his orders in Peoples
To undertake a full thematic investigation of this period would be very much beyond the scope of this paper. Thus, the essay will embark on a high level chronological interpretation of some of the defining events and protagonists, which influenced the early modernization of Ireland during the period 1534-1750. The main focus of the paper will concentrating on the impact and supervision of the Tudor dynasty. Firstly, the essay will endeavour to gain an understanding as to what contemporary historians accept as being the concept of modernization during this time period. The paper will then continue by examine the incumbent societal and political structure of Ireland prior to the Tudor conquests. This will have the impact of highlight the modernising effects produced by the subsequent attempts by the Tudors to consolidate and centralise power in the hands of the State. Once more, due to the vast nature of the time period, not every modernizing effect can be examined. Therefore, the paper will concentrate on the modernization of the political landscape, land ownership and the impact this had on the geographic construct of the island.