Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Post war world war 2
A political shift occurred in Britain in 1945. A general election resulted in the selection of a Labor Party candidate, Clement Attlee, as the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom and the winning of a majority of seats in the Parliament for the Labor Party. Before the election, Winston Churchill was the Prime Minister of the UK, however fluctuating political opinions during wartime and worsening economic conditions led to the falling of the Conservative Party’s appeal to the public. The Labor Party began to appeal to more people in Britain and their growing popularity and energetic campaign strategies promised of a changing political atmosphere. The election of 1945 was a turning point in Britain as it resulted in a Labor majority in the Parliament and the creation of the social welfare program. Winston Churchill resigned on May 23rd, 1945. During the following month, Churchill and Attlee entered into a “broadcasting war”, as the Conservative and Labor parties were vying over seats in the Parliament in the upcoming July election. There was also a split in the Labor Party, as some members of the party were unsure of Attlee’s …show more content…
They believed it was more effective for the industries to be under state intervention rather than left to their own devices. Attlee’s government implemented state collectivism, or performing based on the interests of the common good. They redistributed incomes from the rich to the poor by taxation (Fielding et al). Attlee’s administration was able to make all of these advances despite the weak economy in Britain at this time, as Britain was recovering from five years of war. Historians throughout time have viewed Attlee’s time in office as positive for Britain, as he was able to accomplish many goals in a short amount of time (Fielding et
Firstly, the ‘U-turn’ policies of 1971 to 1972 demonstrate clearly the lack of control that is evident throughout Heath’s premiership. Cracks were beginning to develop after these policies, which indicate a rough start to Heath’s reign. This is evident as the economic U-turn established that there was a growing number of unemployment and a growing inflation record that reached over one million. There were cuts in taxation and lows interests increased borrowing and house prices. Compared to a period of ‘affluence’ in Wilson’s government especially with his social policies, there is unprecedented change as the inflation demonstrated that the retail prices rose by 8.6% between 1970 to 1973 which acclimated to the U-turn policies in 1971-1972 which demonstrated a retreat from the free market and principles that had to be outline to maintain full employment leading Heath to give state aid to key industries including Rolls Royce. However, the ‘U-turn’ policies demonstrates largely that Heath had been seen by the public that he was too willing to give up on his aims and objectives, lacking a clear sense of direction indicating that the failures situated in his government led people finding him unreliable as a PM.
This essay will address whether New Labour contained policies with which it wished to pursue, or was solely developed in order to win elections. It is important to realise whether a political party that held office for approximately 13 years only possessed the goal of winning elections, or promoted policies which it wished to pursue. If a party that held no substance was governing for 13 years, it would be unfair to the people. New Labour was designed to win elections, but still contained policies which it wished to pursue. To adequately defend this thesis, one must look at the re-branding steps taken by New Labour and the new policies the party was going to pursue. Through analysis, it will be shown that New Labour promoted policies in regards
The Liberal victory in General Election of 1906 has gone down in History for being one of the biggest landslides in modern UK politics, but it can be argued that it was more of a Conservative loss than a Liberal gain.
The Significance of the Liberal Election Victory of 1906 “A quiet, but certain, revolution, as revolutions come in a constitutional country” was how Lloyd George hailed the election victory of 1906. The significance of the Liberal election victory of 1906 is that it laid down solid foundations to provide the welfare state we have today. It also saw the rise of the Labour Party, giving the working class its own political voice. The results of the 1906 election were literally a reversal of the 1900 election. The Liberals enjoyed the landslide victory that the conservatives had six years earlier.
Tom Gatenby To what extent did the Conservatives lose the election rather than the Liberals win the election? “The election of 1906 was a significant watershed in the political history of Britain” Kenneth Owen Fox The election of 1906 was a landside victory for the Liberal Party. This is due to many factors, it could been influenced by the manifesto of the Liberal Party, or perhaps even more strongly the failure of the Conservative Party to unify on such reforms as the Tariff Reform. The lack of a strong unified Conservative government clearly had a large effect upon the outcome of the 1906 election, to what extent this is true will be explained in the essay.
On the 19th October, Stanley Baldwin’s speech did play a part as it expressed simply and clearly what many Tory MPs were thinking. At the Carlton Club meeting in 1922 the Conservatives voted to end the coalition and this ditch Lloyd George as Prime Minister.
However, this majority does not seem so great when looked at in percentage of votes. The Liberals won just over 50% of the vote, while the Conservatives were only slightly behind with 43%. This apparent anomaly is explained by the British Electoral system; the 'first past the post' policy where the M.P with the highest number of votes wins, regardless of whether other Parties have nearly the same number of votes. This sensational change in the British public's votes must have been a sign of the obvious change in mood over the Conservative's term.
"Account for the changing political fortunes of the Nazi Party from November, 1923 until January, 1933."
Election results also suggest that the Liberal Government were not heading for failure but proceeding to continue strongly. I therefore contradict Dangerfield's theory that the Liberal government were doomed to failure prior to World War 1, suggesting that they were still a strong government. It would be easy to make assumptions looking back in hindsight as Dangerfield did, however I would argue that upon entering World War 1 the Liberal Party still appeared to be strong. Unfortunately the nature of the pre war years seem to accentuate the problems and cast a shadow over the achievements, Dangerfield is a clear critique of Liberal England and what it has to offer.
After the end of World War II, the United States went through many changes. Most of the changes were for the better, but some had an adverse effect on certain population centers. Many programs, agencies and policies were created to transform American society and government.
American Society on the Change during the Post-World War Years. After World War II, Americans experienced a time of rapid social change. American soldiers were discharged and returned home from the battlefields, hoping to find work and to get on with their lives. Marriage rates increased dramatically after the war.
FDR enters the election with a strong, but not unbeatable, hand. The measures that FDR took during his first term in the White House didn’t produce prosperity. But they were able to pull the country out of depression and made sure that millions of people were better off than they had been when he first took office (Boller, P.240). Still the economy remained sluggish and eight million Americans were without jobs. At this election, he brought out the New Deal that would help all groups and firms. By this time Roosevelt had become the center of both passionate adoration and burning hatred. With millions of Americans support he had become more popular than the New Deal itself (Boller, P.240). Critics from various points on the political spectrum such as Father Coughlin and Dr. Francis Townsend had spent much of the previous two years attacking the President. They supported Representative William Lemke of the newly formed Union Party in the 1936 election (American President: A Reference Resource).
...y more appealing by removing themselves from the criticisms that both the conservatives and liberals had and making labour appear as a new, different way in which politics should by heading. This may also be true by appearing to be the most progressive party. By promoting themselves a party of progress and change, labour would have appealed to the electorate who were uninterested in the same promises by traditional parties and convince more non voters to vote for a party that promotes radical and progressive changes. It is argued by the majority of critics that ‘new’ labour wasn’t as especially new as they made themselves seem, instead they took from a variety of past and present governments different ideals, goals and politics and combining them all to make a ‘new’ progressive party that would appeal to the masses that wanted a new radical change in politics.
Winston Churchill is a great figure in British and world history. After winning the seat of Oldham in the 1900 general elections, he became associated with a faction of the conservative party then led by Lord Hugh Cecil. Churchill opposed government expenditures on the army. His own constituency disliked him, although he was the Member of Parliament until the next general election. After the recess of Whitsun in 1904 he crossed sides to the liberal party where he supported free trade.
...ed heavily on public subsidy, and the gas and electricity companies had in many cases developed as municipal undertakings. They seem of proper national concern. The iron and steel industry proved more controversial, being denationalized and renationalized in subsequent years. In international affairs the Attlee government introduces a major change of direction, beginning the dismantling of the British Empire. The empire becomes gradually transformed into a Commonwealth of independent nations, capable of accommodating republics as well as monarchies.