Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Unresolved conflict in the workplace
Workplace conflict
Beginnings of the U. S. Party System
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Polarization is defined as “division into two sharply contrasting groups or sets of opinions or belief.” Political polarization is defined as “the difference in supporters’ political ideas on policy, issues, and candidates forming a gap between individuals and parties.” Americans tend to the lineup with the political party that closely relates to their personal values and beliefs. Americans have always struggled to decide on the right political course of action for the country, forming a divided on critical issues. Voters have different views on important political issues creating conflict and increasing the polarization. The primary cause of political polarization is difference between political parties but is also formed through race, gender, …show more content…
and religion. Over the last several decade's cultural changes have increased the effect of political polarization in the United States.
One of these cultural changes in society is the rise in racial and ethical diversity in politics. Since President Johnson signed the Civil Rights Act in 1964, there has been a shift in politics regarding race. On the day of the Civil Rights Act signing President Johnson said: “I think we just delivered the South to the Republican Party for a long time to come.” The signing of the Civil Rights Acts would forever change America and set off a chain reaction in the political parties. After the signing southern white conservatives left the Democratic party and joined the Republican party. Leaving behind the liberals and minority groups including African Americans and Hispanic. Racial diversity still heavily divides American society. Some may even consider the United States segregated and unequal in terms of racial voting. The minority groups such as African Americans and Latinos tend to lean toward the liberal party. While the major of the Republican party is white, wealthy, upper-class individuals. The Liberal party also has many minorities that struggle to receive education, job opportunities, and proper housing. Their difference in lifestyle creates the racial gap in political …show more content…
polarization. Race is not the only factor behind the rise in political polarization. Another key element has been the growing religious divide between the parties. The main religious disturbance is between the Protestants and Catholics in American politics. One of the first political religious divided was on the decision of Roe v. Wade many religions believed that abortion should be banned thus shifting religious voters to the right side of the spectrum. While non-religious individuals went to the left side of the spectrum. Some of the other major religious divides include same-sex marriage and gay rights. In Kentucky, Kim Davis a County Clerk would not license same-sex marriages claiming it was against her religion. This created an uprising across the United States deciding if she had the religious right to not issue same-sex marriages. Republican members announced their support for her claiming the First Amendment right of freedom of religion. Liberals were against saying it was her duty to issues marriage licenses to same-sex couples no matter her religious beliefs. There has always been a religious difference in politics and will forever be present. Since the start of voting in America men hold a conservative stance on issues of foreign policy, racial diversity, and welfare more so than women. In the 1960s, the gap between the Republican and Democratic Party began to increase. As American began to realize there was a polarization in politics, voters slowly started to shift to the political party that corresponds to their values and beliefs. Pre-existing gender preferences caused women to identify with Liberals and men to become Republican. Some of the main reasons for the gender gap and preferences were the increase in female workforce, rise in the divorce rate, an increase in the feminist movement as women became less independent on men. Men have always held more conservative views then women who tend to side with the liberals. Because men consistently have a conservative stance on important issues leading to a divide between men and women. Huddy, Cassese, and Lizotte created the “economic autonomy hypothesis” which explained that women have become less independent on men which has lead them to contribute to the workforce and increasing women’s curiosity on political issues. Another reason for gender polarization would be the feminist movement. Feminist hold more modern Liberal views on social issues. From “Gendered Perceptions and Political Candidacies; A Central Barrier to Women’s Equality in Electoral Politics” by Richard Fox and Jennifer Lawless states the perceptions between men and women greatly differ on political matters. Women believe themselves to not have the traits to run for politic office were as men possess the confidence to believe they have these traits. Fox and Lawless explain why the gender gap in the United States exists in elections today. As of today, the United States Congress consists of 105 women making up approximately 19.6% of the 535 members of Congress. The Senate is comprised of 21 women and the House of Representatives have 84 women serving. A major element in political polarization is the divided between the Democratic party and the Republican party.
To be fair, the political parties have always disliked each other. But in recent year the divided has become broader among political parties. The divided between political parties has become so strong that different party members do not even what to be in the same room as each other. A study conducted by the Pew Research Center shows that 63% of conservatives and 49% of liberals say most of their friends share the same political values as themselves. Opposite party members are no longer engaging with each other to share political views in a friendly manner, people want nothing to do with the opposite party. This is partly because people tend to drift toward people with the same values. From Polarized: Making Sense of a Divided American written by James Campbell, it states that “Nearly half of Americans (49%) were either liberal or conservative in the early 1970s. This increase to about 56% by 2012.” Americans today are identifying themselves more and more as either Liberals or Conservatives increasing the political polarization in the United
States. When it comes to explaining political polarization in American the main factors are the difference in political parties, gender gap, religious beliefs, and racial diversity. Since the beginning of politics in the United States political polarization has been present, but in recent years polarization has increased. Minority groups and women have identified themselves as Liberals and Republicans are mainly white men increasing polarization in the United States. Since the 1960s American society has grown more polarized with each election and the country will continue to become more polarized until Americans can find common ground with each other.
Furthermore, he introduces the idea that popular polarization is different from partisan polarization and that sorting has occurred within the parties. Meaning that “those who affiliate with a party… are more likely to affiliate with the ideologically ‘correct’ party than they were [before]” (Fiorina et al. 61). To illustrate the concept of polarization he uses a figure with marble filled urns. These urns depict red blue and gray marbles with r for republican d for democrat and i for independent. When polarization, all gray independent marbles disappear becoming either red or blue.
Because the most polarized individuals are often the most politically active, they have the most influence on the government, which results in the election of polarized candidates and policies.
Party polarization is the idea that a party’s individual stance on a given issue or person is more likely to be liberal or conservative. Typically the rise of political uniformity has been more noticeable among people who are the most politically active, but as of late, the vast majority of the American public is spilt down the middle. The broad gap between liberals and conservatives is growing rapidly through the years. Which brings on questions of why there is a cultural division? While it is agreed by most political scientists that the media, elected officials, and interest groups are polarized on given issues, in James Q. Wilson’s article How Divided Are We? he discusses the factors that contribute to the division not only to those major
In this essay, I will explain why Texas should retain the partisan election of judges. Texas is one of the few states that elect their judges using a Partisan voting method. Partisan elections can be unfair and can misinform the voter. A high legal position such as a judge should never be chosen in such a manner. Partisan elections often cost more than nonpartisan elections in campaigning. Partisan elections are also more likely to lead to straight ticket voting or mindless voting. Partisan elections also lead to more campaign contributions and can increase the power of constituencies. Lastly partisan elections can cause an imbalance in equal represent the population. Therefore, Partisanship voting does not belong in the courts of Texas and
In Sinclair’s analysis, voters, political activists, and politicians all play significant roles in creating and enforcing the ideological gap between the two major parties in Congress. This trend of polarization is rooted in the electorate
Political Polarization is one of the most widely accepted causes of political gridlock, as the two sides continue to drift further and further apart. But why does the chasm keep growing? A few different theories call out the masses and the elites as being the principal actors in driving polarization. Fiorina says that the masses, or just average people, are not the ones that are polarizing. In fact she thinks that it is the elites who are driving polarization as they attempt to stay as far away
Whether political polarization is good or bad for the nation is still up for debate, but the general consensus is it exists due to a variety of reasons. From the construction of our Constitution, it is clear that the intent of our founding fathers was to create opposition in order to prevent tyranny from prevailing. Polarization is a result of the dividing of a nation into political parties. Though polarization has fluctuated throughout the years, it has caused a great deal of trouble in regards to passing legislation and has resulted in a gridlocked Congress. Even though some fear congressional polarization is destined to get worse, “it is mathematically impossible for congress to get much more polarized” than it is now.
In the United States we are divided by the left and right side on the political spectrum; even further divided into political parties such as Republicans, on the right, and Democrats, on the left side. These two political parties show philosophical differences through their viewpoints on major topics such as the economy, separation of church and state, abortion, and gun control.
Cleavages existing in society are divisions such as religion, gender, race, and most importantly socioeconomic status. Political parties form around these divisions in society and in America’s society; money has proven to be the major factor. The major parties in American politics are Democrat and Republican, and the political preference of each member of these parties’ deals greatly with the amount of income they receive.
In the United States electoral map, it has always been known that Democratic and Republican political parties stand by their foundational policies and operating principles. The central dogma of the two political parties has strictly been adhered to with the Democrats regarded as the conservative party while Republicans the liberal party (Kornhauser, 2013). However, an in-depth analysis of the political realignments suggests that a historical reversal role has taken effect as evidenced by the long transition of the parties’ founding principles. The role of the historical reversal system in creating the flips forms the basis of this paper.
There is much debate in the United States whether or not there is polarization between our two dominate political parties. Presidential election results have shown that there is a division between the states; a battle between the Democratic blue states and the Republican red states. And what is striking is that the “colors” of these states do not change. Red stays red, and blue stays blue. Chapter 11 of Fault Lines gives differing views of polarization. James Wilson, a political science professor at Pepperdine University in California, suggests that polarization is indeed relevant in modern society and that it will eventually cause the downfall of America. On the contrast, Morris Fiorina, a political science professor at Stanford University, argues that polarization is nothing but a myth, something that Americans should not be concerned with. John Judis, a senior editor at The New Republic, gives insight on a driving force of polarization; the Tea Party Movement. Through this paper I will highlight the chief factors given by Wilson and Judis which contribute to polarization in the United States, and will consider what factors Fiorina may agree with.
Before the Civil Rights Act of 1964, segregation in the United States was commonly practiced in many of the Southern and Border States. This segregation while supposed to be separate but equal, was hardly that. Blacks in the South were discriminated against repeatedly while laws did nothing to protect their individual rights. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 ridded the nation of this legal segregation and cleared a path towards equality and integration. The passage of this Act, while forever altering the relationship between blacks and whites, remains as one of history’s greatest political battles.
Today, political parties can be seen throughout everyday life, prevalent in various activities such as watching television, or seeing signs beside the road while driving. These everyday occurrences make the knowledge of political parties commonly known, especially as the two opposing political parties: the Republicans and the Democrats. Republican and Democrats have existed for numerous years, predominantly due to pure tradition, and the comfort of the ideas each party presents. For years, the existence of two political parties has dominated the elections of the president, and lower offices such as mayor, or the House of Representatives. Fundamentally, this tradition continues from the very emergence of political parties during the election of 1796, principally between Federalist John Adams and Anti-federalist Thomas Jefferson. Prior to this election people unanimously conformed to the ideas of one man, George Washington, and therefore did not require the need for political parties.1 However, following his presidency the public was divided with opposing opinions, each arguing the best methods to regulate the country. Ultimately, the emergence of different opinions regarding the future of the United States involving the economy, foreign relations, ‘the masses,’ and the interpretation of the Constitution, led to the two political parties of the 1790s and the critical election of 1800.
Political Divide in the United States The political divide in the United States is very bad. The two main political parties are the democrats and the republicans. The two parties dislike each other and each other's views. Abortion is something that has been talked about a lot, some people find it good and others find it as a bad thing. Health care is another issue that is controversial. Another big issue is illegal immigration. The death penalty and euthanasia are also reasons the government is divided. The topic of the right to bear arms is also very controversial, especially with all the murders and riots going on. Global warming, even though it does not seem very political, is a topic that comes up a lot in political speeches and events. And lastly, the separation of church and state is another topic that gets in heated discussions in politics. Not all of these seem like they are political, but they have been made into be, even though they should not have, the United States is divided over them. The political parties have caused the country to be divided. Democrats and Republicans, also known as liberals and conservatives, most people do
In today’s society, there are many aspects dividing us as people and Americans, whether we like it or not. This includes gender, race, economic status, and geographical location. But one if the biggest dividers that often incites arguments and can terminate friendships is politics. Many Americans often have a political stance, and that determines what political party you partake in. It is often said conservatives are considered realistic and liberals are considered idealistic. Although these are common stereotypes, there is statistical data supporting them. An article posted on UWire talks about a study done at the University of Nebraska at Lincoln. According to Kevin Brian Smith, a political science professor, “…there is physiologically a