Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Crime statistics analyzing
Source and limitations of crime statistics
Crime statistics analyzing
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Crime statistics analyzing
Introduction
There has been a debate on whether the data from reported crime statistics is credible for many years. Researchers feel that data is contaminated by differences in law enforcement reporting practices, advancements in technology per agency, and changes in whether victims report or do not report crimes (Levitt, 1998). But still crime reports are still used when determining if current policing practices are effective.
When capturing crime, Regoli & Hewitt (2008) say that “official crime statistics, which are based on the aggregate records of offenders and offenses processed by police, courts, and correction agencies; and unofficial crime statistics, which are produced by people and agencies outside the criminal justice system” are
…show more content…
Both reports are used because there is not enough data from the NIBRS due to the lack of participation from reporting agencies. However, the FBI still creates annual publications using the UCR. As such, the FBI converts data submitted from NIBRS-compliant law enforcement agencies into UCR summary data (James, N. & Council, L, 2008).
What is the Uniform Crime Reports
Commissioned by the International Association of Chiefs of Police (IACP), the Uniform Crime Reports (UCR) was prepared to provide local law enforcement agencies a manual on standardized crime reporting (Inciardi, 1978). In 1930, Congress authorized the Federal Bureau of Investigations to collect and document voluntary criminal data from local communities, universities, county, state, tribal, and federal law enforcement agencies. The FBI has the responsibility of compiling and distributing these criminal statistics in the form of a publication known as the UCR.
Benefits of the Uniform Crime
…show more content…
The top similarity among these is that NIBRS data are based on incidents reported to police and recorded by police (Maxfield, 1999).
Voluntary Participation
Participation for both the UCR and the NIBRs are voluntary. This could be problematic in regards to accuracy. Inciardi (1978), states that some agencies “report information to the UCR which is totally unlike that which appears in their own files.” This leaves room for incomplete or contaminated information. For example if a department wanted to make their areas crime rates look better for political reasons, they could “cook the books,” and only report statistics that reflect that. Because these programs are voluntary the volume of these types of incidents is undetermined.
Reporting Processes
The general concepts for obtaining, compiling, rating, and reporting criminal data for the UCR are still applicable for the NIBRS. “For example, the jurisdictional rules for collecting data from city, county, state, tribal, and federal law enforcement agencies and the conditions under which a state UCR Program must operate remain the same” (Criminal Justice Information Services Division,
Crime data is a resource being used to help understand who the victims are, their age, race, what type of crime they have committed. The more information someone has about crime the more prepared they can be to deal with the victim, evaluate programs that help prevent crime. There are several official sources used UCR, NCVS, NIBRS that are used. There are pros and cons to each source and the following information will include some of the positive and some of the negatives points of each report. This is not inclusive by any means, there are many different various pros and cons of each report.
The FBI’s UCR Program, which began in 1929, collects information on the following crimes reported to law enforcement authorities: murder and non-negligent manslaughter, forcible rape, robbery, aggravated assault, burglary, larceny-theft, motor vehicle theft, and arson. Law enforcement agencies report arrest data for 21 additional crime categories.
This information comes from the Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR). The Uniform Crime Reporting technique was established in 1930, by the FBI. Crime was something that was very hard to keep track of. The FBI started this technique to keep track of crimes that are happening in our nation. Police use uniform crime reporting for their data. Some police departments or officers are required to focus on one specific area and crime. The most popular crimes all deal with drugs. CompSTAT help to map these crimes so that police officers know what geographical location to pay the most attention to. CompSTAT is the most popular technique for police departments to use. When they collect the data of crimes, they take this information and they start to evaluate and create techniques on how to stop or prevent this crime from happening again. According to Police Executive Research forum, “Compstat changed how police view crime problems. Instead of merely responding to crimes after they are committed, police fundamentally expanded their mission to include preventing crimes from happening in the first place” (Compstat: Its Origins, Evolution, and Future In Law Enforcement Agencies, 9). After collecting data for crime mapping the next step is for them to analyze the
The mission and values of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) is up held with strong Constitutional values. Over the years since the FBI was created in 1908 by Attorney General Charles Bonaparte during the Presidency of Theodore Roosevelt. As a progressive during this time period Bonaparte applied his philosophy to forming the FBI with several corps of agents. His thought was that these men should have expertise and not political connections. With the U.S. Constitution based on “federalism” a national government with jurisdiction over matters that cross boundaries, such as interstate and foreign affairs.
Federal Bureau of Investigation Careers. United States Dept. of Justice, n.d. Web. 8 Dec. 2011. .
No theories are presented; instead, the authors elect to analyze secondary data from previous studies, surveys, experiments, and other social science literature. Although some of the research cited was conducted by one (or both) authors previously, most of the data comes from Gallup Polls, federal statistics, and literature or experiments published by other criminologists in journals or books.
"FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin: A History." FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin 81.12 (2012): 1-2. Academic Search Premier. Web. 30 Mar. 2014.
Bureau of Justice Assistance, Police Executive Research Forum. (2012). Compstat: Its Origins, Evolution, and Future in Law Enforcement Agencies. Retrieved from http://policeforum.org/library/compstat/Compstat.pdf
The COMPSTAT ( Compare-Statistics) system was developed by the New York Police Department in 1994 and is credited with having a significant impact on the reduction of major crimes in New York city. COMPSTAT is internationally recognized as having become an extremely successful tool, incorporating accurate crime intelligence analysis methods and streamlining law enforcement management processes, including the seeding of power to local district commanders. In broad strokes, COMPSTAT can be described as a series of process used for the collection and analysis of criminal intelligence data which in turn assists commanders in developing effective strategies and tactics to combat crime.
Due to the fact that the Uniform Crime Report is released every year, allows for it to be readily available and updated for the media, researchers, students, and government organizations (Rosen, 1995). This is advantages to society because this information is readily available to the public which can be used for statistics or research.
The author focuses on the U.S. Task Force on 21st Century Policing and Police Data Initiative or PDI to determine if it helps to restore trust and the broken relationship between and communities and police officers. The Task Force made by Barack Obama recommended the analysis of department policies, incidents of misconduct, recent stops and arrests, and demographics of the officers. The PDI has tasked 21 cities to comprehend the police behavior and find out what to do to change it. Also PDI was said to have data and information on vehicle stops and shootings by police officers. The use of statistics has a purpose to help rebuild trust and the relationship between and communities and police officers.
Over the years, research has shown an increase in crime is largely over-represented in media coverage, compared to actual crime rates in society. Reports
The FBI uses Statistics to solve hundreds of cases, statistics allow the FBI to make predictions to solve a case before they have evidence enough to solve it. Since the FBI is the United States largest law enforcement agency focused mainly on United States soil the FBI needs a way to stay organized so the FBI built a computer program called ViCAP. ViCAP is a database to hold all of the FBI’s crimes. This program can be used to find a similar case in years passed and look back to see what kind of person the statistics point to. The FBI uses advanced statistics compiled by using the mean (average), and looking at the type of person who committed the crime, the severity of the crime, and the age of the person who committed the crime. While out in the field, FBI agents take notes on even the smallest thing that could give a hint to solving a case such as if the crime scene is organized denotes multiple offenses. Statistics are also compiled when looking for a stolen item such as money from a bank, for example, if money is stolen; statistics might tell you where to look, the age, gender, ethnicity, and type of person (down to the car they might drive). Statistics are especially important wh...
Crime Analysis has many benefits to the community. Community engagement, targeted initiatives, strategic use of resources, and data-driven decision-making contribute to decreasing crime. Crime prevention and community satisfaction with police services, while linked to the number of officers on the streets, does not depend entirely on the visibility of patrol officers. Community engagement, targeted initiatives, strategic use of resources, and data-driven decision-making contribute to decreasing crime. So in closing I believe that departments that take the positive elements of foot patrols and combine their efforts with crime analysis that focuses on the time, location, and type of crime, may use the findings to develop strategies to decrease crime and enhance the quality of life in their communities.
The uniform crime reporting system is a statistical reporting program run by the federal bureau of investigation: criminal justice information services division (CJIS). The uniform crime reporting system is done annually. The crimes normally reported are non-negligent manslaughter, forcible rape, larceny theft, motor vehicle theft and arson. These crimes are considered violent by both their nature and volume of crimes committed. Not all crimes are reported. The “lesser crimes” are discounted in the view of the federal bureau of investigation. Emphasize is put on violent crimes. The uniform crime reporting system function is to report an annual summation of the incidence and rate of reported crime. This helps to give a picture on what kinds