Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay on trash
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essay on trash
In the novel ‘Trash’, there are many different points of view of characters such as, Raphael, Gardo, Father Juilliard and Olivia Weston. Just by having a variety of different point of views, the reader is given more information on the event and understanding the characters and the storyline itself is enhanced.
Because there isn’t a point of view from Rat in part three, chapters 1-8, the reader knows very little about Rat. But just from the other point of views from characters such as Raphael and Gardo, the reader will have a general idea of who Rat is and what he looks like. On page 19, Raphael describes Rat, “His real name is Jun-Jun.” “He was the only kid in Behala that I knew of who had no family.” On page 18, from Raphael’s point of view, he says, “I’m thinking it’s about the only place they’re not gonna look.” This is the point in ‘Trash’ where Raphael suggests to Gardo that they should hide the bag in Rat’s home. Part three,
…show more content…
The point of view of each character may explain how they are involved on the event. When Raphael describes Rat, he informs the reader about things that they don’t already know. This creates a better understanding of Rat, and as the story expands, the reader will better understand Rat’s actions in the story. If Raphael had not explained to the reader why they were going to hide the bag inside Rat’s home, it could be something too sudden for the reader to understand why they decided to hide the bag there. If Olivia hadn’t written about the visit of Gabriel Olondriz, the reader will later on be confused when the characters started talking about the information that Gabriel provided them. By including this event in the story, the reader can better understand the situation and also, be given extra information from Gabriel that both characters and the reader didn’t
“The Black Rat” explores the days during and after World War Two. It also honours Iris’s father as a war hero. The poem has described how the soldier lived during the war and the effort he demonstrated when fighting for his land. The phrase, “He lived in a tin hut with a hard dirt floor. He had bags sewn together that was his door,” gives the reader an
I chose to write about the narrator and his friends because I found there was more to them than just the bad guy persona they wanted everyone to see. I find the narrator and his friends are dynamic characters because in the end of the story they lets go of all his childish pretending and changes into the en they are supposed to be. “We were bad. We read Andre Gide and stuck elaborate poses to show we didn’t give a shit about anything.” (Boyle 529) This quote sums up that they have to...
Also, the narrator indirect character because the author doesn’t tell us about her personality, it was located in the context clues. Chatita, according the context clues, is a little girl, who is faint of hearing and forgetful. In the book of Marigold, Miss. Lottie is a direct character because in the story, she is an matured lady, who is very poor. According to the story, Lizabeth is a indirect character because she is a sophisticated young woman that execute immature things to do, for her enjoyment, like breaking Miss. Lottie’s marigolds. Sometimes in the story, the author can use characterization in all of his characters but in these stories only a couple people have characterization. Without characterization, the story will become uninteresting and the plot wouldn’t make sense, for example if an author doesn’t apply a personality to character then it wouldn’t help the rest of the story because you don’t know what the character is
The plot of the novel is creatively explained in a way that anyone can visualize through the event...
Not only has the respective wishes of Gabriel and Maria influenced their children it also caused problems between each other.
Analysis of Kurt Vonnegut's Slaughterhouse-Five Section One- Introduction Slaughterhouse-Five, written by Kurt Vonnegut Junior, was published in 1968 after twenty-three years of internal anguish. The novel was a "progressive work" after Vonnegut returned from World War II. Why did it take twenty-three years for Kurt Vonnegut to write this novel?
The narrator in the story does not know everything in the story, the narrator cannot understand everything in the story, and can only describe everything that happens in the story through, the narrator’s view, and thoughts, portraying that the story is told in the first person limited point of view. For example, when Sheila was describing how fishing was boring, or uninteresting for her, the narrator tries to think of ways why her dislike of fishing came through, but never really figures it out, “Now I have spent a great deal of time in the years why Sheila Mant should come down so hard on fishing/ Had she tried it once” (Wetherell 3). This shows that the narrator is desperately trying hard to figure out why does, Sheila, someone that the narrator hold in high regard, hates something that, the narrator also holds in high regard. Despite, the previous mentions that the narrator had learned so much about Sheila, the narrator was not knowledgeable on the topics that Sheila was talking about in the canoe ride with the narrator. “It was a few minutes before I was able to catch up with her train of thought/I had no idea whom she meant” (Wetherell 2,3), many instances were showed that the narrator had really nothing in common with Sheila, and could not give much
serve to allow the reader to perceive not only the story presented in front of them but
In his novel, Slaughterhouse-Five, Kurt Vonnegut dips his words in satire and sprinkles them with hidden themes that can only be understood if one takes the necessary steps to seek them out. Upon dissecting these themes, I have come to find Vonnegut’s novel as one that unveils the mediocre reality of how society acts and thinks and offers suggestions on how the it should actually be. Such themes are also found in other pieces of literature, that when compared, evoke a better understanding of Slaughterhouse-Five. Such works of literature are Kurt Vonnegut’s satirical address to a graduating class at Bennington College in 1970, Rudyard Kipling’s poem “If,” and Lawrence Ferlinghetti’s “The World Is a Beautiful Place.” These writer’s ideas lie
To sum up everything we can say that Gabriel's story in The Dead surely is not a story about love, nor about a man with different faces but much more a story about a man finding his way out of the life he never really lived. The prime concern is that in this story we are dealing with a progress or a development of Gabriel's character. It is a progress of finding his true self, which he himself probably not even knew. Self-awareness, self-consciousness and a sudden real subjectivity are the 'signposts' in Gabriel's path he has to undergo.
The Giver starts off as the ordinary story of an eleven-year-old boy named Jonas. When we meet the protagonist, he is apprehensive about the Ceremony of Twelve, at which he will be assigned his job. Although he has no clue as to what job he might be assigned, he is astonished when he is selected to be the Receiver of Memory. He learns that it is a job of the highest honor, one that requires him to bear physical pain of a magnitude beyond anyone’s experience.
The Bell Jar, written by Sylvia Plath, starts of in the summer of the mid-1950s. Esther Greenwood, the main character, is a 19 year full of ambition and creativity that works at a popular magazine company. Esther mainly has two “best friends”, Betsy and Doreen. Having a pretty decent life in New York she feels as though she is missing something and that she isn’t experiencing life as some of the other ladies her age are. Esther is faced with the thought of not being what she should be. Which is, what the other women of her age are expected to be, by society’s views. The night before Esther is supposed to go back to her mother, who lives in the suburbs outside of Boston, she goes to a country club dance with Doreen and Doreen’s boyfriend and
The author brings readers into the story and lets readers decide and infer what is going to be said. Patrick Maloney has to tell his wife, Mary Maloney something very important, but the author doesn’t tell readers what Patrick says. On page twelve it explains the missing context and when readers have to use their minds to infer what is going to be said “And he told her. It didn’t take long,
Gabriel Conroy, through his self-righteous concern for others, has created an internal paralysis. Because Gabriel dwells on events in the past he is unable to move forward in his life with satisfaction. Although Gabriel indisputably loves his wife, the elusive curse created by Michael Furey's inconsequential existence, long before he and Gretta were involved, has instigated unruly thoughts on Gabriel's behalf. This vague and malicious being breaks down Gabriel's ego; he questions the validity of his and Gretta's love for one another and the significance of his own life. These thought processes cause Gabriel to believe himself better off dead rather than alive, banishing him to a life of eternal discontent.
First, we must discuss the state of Gabriel’s identity before it fades. Before it fades, he is misunderstood and has no firm conception of how his existence affects others. This fact is seen when Gabriel has a conversation with Lily. During this conversation, Gabriel exclaims that “I suppose we'll be going to your wedding one of these fine days with your young man” (197). Lily responds, with “great bitterness,” that “the men that is now is only all palaver and what they can get out of you” (197).