Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The white man's burden
The spanish american war
American imperialism in leading the united states into spanish american war
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The white man's burden
The late 1800’s were a tumultuous time for the United States, one consisting of both monumental gains, serious losses, and unsurprisingly, a number of vicious wars. Two of these wars in particular, are important, not to the history of the United States specifically, but to almost all world powers at the time, as they were prime examples of what would later be referred to as “The White Man’s Burden”. The first being the Spanish-American War, which mainly revolved around U.S. attacks on Spain’s colonies in the Pacific, and the demand for Cuban independence. Although it only lasted 10 weeks, the Cuban Republic, being the smaller fighting contingency, faced heavy losses, with casualties exceeding ten thousand. The ultimate result of this war was …show more content…
English poet Rudyard Kipling was the genius behind the pen, initially writing the poem specifically for Queen Victoria’s Diamond Jubilee, which was a celebration to mark her surpassing her grandfather as the longest running monarch in both Scottish, English, and British history. The poem was significantly altered from its original state, going from a prayer describing a powerful, unbroken fate between beings to a poem solely focused on the American colonization of the Philippines, after the Spanish American War. Many readers view this poem differently, with opinions ranging from a justification of imperialism as a noble enterprise, to an example of Eurocentric racism. Despite varying opinions, and different analytical standpoints, Kipling originally wrote the poem with the hope that it would be interpreted as a philanthropic …show more content…
This viewpoint was only accepted by few, but it was also widely understood that certain steps needed to be taken in portions of central Africa and many other parts of the world. The colonial powers, consisting of Great Britain, Spain, Portugal, the Netherlands, France, Denmark, Russia, Germany, Italy, and the United States, are personified as, “The White Man,” in the poem. The ‘White Man’ had a mutual goal to civilize and evangelize the barbaric nations, most of which had primitive governments, lack of community structures, and an absence of religion. The Philippines were a prime example of this, as the United States easily stymied the flow of revolution in the late 19th-early 20th century, after the United States received the territory from
This book by Otis A. Singletary deals with different aspects of the Mexican war. It is a compelling description and concise history of the first successful offensive war in United States military history. The work examines two countries that were unprepared for war. The political intrigues and quarrels in appointing the military commanders, as well as the military operations of the war, are presented and analyzed in detail. The author also analyzes the role that the Mexican War played in bringing on the U.S. Civil War.
For four hundred years Spain ruled over an immense and profitable global empire that included islands in the Caribbean, Americas, Puerto Rico, and Cuba. After the Napoleonic Wars (1808-1815) many of Spain’s colonies followed the US’s lead, fighting and winning their independence. These revolts, coupled with other nations chipping away at Spain’s interests, dwindled Spain’s former Empire. By 1860, only Cuba and Puerto Rico were what remained of Spain’s former Empire. Following the lead of other former Spanish colonies, Cuban fighters started their campaign for independence, known as the Ten year war (1868-1878). This war developed into a Cuban insurgency which fought a guerilla war against the Spanish occupation.2
United States of America. Library of Congress. Chronology of Cuba in the Spanish-American War. N.p., 22 June 2011. Web. 03 Mar. 2014.
The struggle of Cuba to gain its independence from Spain, which began in 1895, has captured the attention of many Americans. Spain’s brutal repressive measures to halt the rebellion were graphically portrayed for the U.S. public by American newspaper publishers, William Randolph Hearst and Joseph Pulitzer which caused to shape the national mood of agitation against Spain. Hearst and Pulitzer exaggerated the actual events in Cuba and how did Spanish brutally treated their prisoners by adding sensational words to catch the emotions of readers. However, publishing stories against the atrocities of Spain did not convince President Cleveland to support the intervention with Spain. When President McKinley held the office in 1897, he wanted to end the revolt peacefully, and he tried to avoid the involvement of America to the conflict between Cuba and Spain. McKinley sent Stewart Woodford to Spain to negotiate for peaceful Cuban autonomy and it all went smoothly and the independence of Cuba was supposed to be awarded after the negotiation. However, the peaceful settlement suddenly vanished after the incident of February 1898 when a private letter for a Cuban friend written by the Spanish minister Enrique Dupuy de Lome was stolen by a Cuban age...
The Spanish-American war was the first and biggest step that the United States of America took toward imperialism. It was the war that secured the US as the most powerful country in the world. This war was a benefit to the USA because we gained land, gained respect, and taught a lesson to one of our enemies. In addition to this, the losses that we suffered were almost nothing compared to other conflicts or wars. The Spanish-American war was by no means for the sole purpose of gaining land and respect, the United States freed an oppressed country and took pieces of land that were better off under US control.
For 113 days during the summer of 1898, the United States was at war with Spain. Neither the president of the United States, nor his cabinet, nor the the queen of Spain, nor her ministers wanted the war wanted the war. It happened eventhough they made their best efforts to prevent it. It happened because of ambition, miscalculation, and stupidity; and it happened because of kindness, wit, and resourcefulness. It also happened because some were indifferent to the suffering of the world’s wretched and others were not (O’Toole 17). By winning the war the United States proved the the rest of the world and to itself that it could and would fight against foreign nations. For many years, world power had been concentrated in the countries in Europe. Nations such as Great Britain, France, Germany, and Spain had the most influence in global affairs. But a shift in power was gradually taking place as the United States matured. The young nation gained wealth and strength. Its population grew immensely, and many people believed it would become a major world power (Bachrach, 11) Spain was one of the many European countries that had territory in the United States. Spain controlled mostly some islands off the coast of Central America. The most important of these were Cuba and Puerto Rico. The United States was led to believe that the Spanish mosgoverned and abused the people of these islands. In fact, Spain did overtax and mistreat the Cubans, who rebelled in 1868 and again in 1895. Thus, the American people felt sympathetic toward the Cuban independence movement. In addition, Spain had frequently interfered with trade between its colonies and the United States. Even though the United States had been a trading partner with Cuba since the seventeenth century, Spain sometimes tried to completely stop their trade with Cuba. In Spain doing so, this sometimes caused damage to U.S. commercial interests. The United States highly disagreed with Spain’s right to interfere with this trade relationship. (Bachrach, 12) The United States was also concerned that other trading and commercial interests were threatened by the number of ships and soldiers Spain kept in the area. If the United States had to fight a war with Canada or Mexico, these Spanish forces could quickly mobilize against the United States.
Beginning in 1845 and ending in 1850 a series of events took place that would come to be known as the Mexican war and the Texas Revolution. This paper will give an overview on not only the events that occurred (battles, treaties, negotiations, ect.) But also the politics and reasoning behind it all. This was a war that involved America and Mexico fighting over Texas. That was the base for the entire ordeal. This series of events contained some of the most dramatic war strategy that has ever been implemented.
Do you find it interesting that historians rarely agree on how and why wars are waged? As intricate as the proposed theories tend to be, gender politics is rarely an issue that is held up to a magnifying glass. In Kristin Hoganson’s book, Fighting for American Manhood: How Gender Politics Provoked the Spanish-American and Philippine-American Wars, the author presents many valid examples of how the desire to uphold “manly values” fueled American leaders’ involvement in martial affairs. Throughout her book, Hoganson takes many of the historic theories that attempt to explain the causes of both the Spanish-American and Philippine-American Wars, while cleverly unveils how these theories were driven by ideals such as proving one’s masculinity, honor, and glory. Hoganson gives us good reason to believe that although “gender politics” was not the direct connection to America’s involvement in the Spanish-American and Philippine-American Wars, it did cause America to make drastic decisions when dealing with foreign affairs in an effort to “prove their manliness”.
Thomas, Anne Van Wynen, and A. J. Thomas, Jr. "Non-Intervention And The Spanish Civil War."
The Mexican War of 1846-1848 was one of major importance to U.S. history, but has since fallen into annals of obscurity. It was the nation’s first war fought on foreign soil: a war that advocated the concept of “manifest destiny”, the United States God-given right to claim territory for the establishment of a free democratic society (Stevenson 2009). Even though many historians claim the war was forced on Mexico by slaveholders greedy for new territory, President John Polk viewed the war as an opportunity to defend the annexation of Texas, establish the Rio Grande as its border, and to acquire the Mexican territories of California and New Mexico (Stevenson 2009).
In 1895, American citizens took notice of a Cuban revolt against their corrupt Spanish oppressor. The Cuban insurgents reasoned that if they did enough damage, the US might move in and help the Cubans win their independence. Not only did Americans sympathize with the Cubans upon seeing tragic reports in the newspaper, but they also empathized that the US once fought for their own independence from Britain. If France didn’t intervene, the Americans probably would not have won their freedom. As if this did not rally enough hate for the Spanish among the American Public, fuel was added to the flame by the Spanish General (“Butcher”)
This source is instrumental for a college student to understand that many events occurred in response to the breakdown of associations between the United States and Spain over the effort by the concluding to end an uprising in its island society of Cuba. The author, David Turpie states that once the war provisions began in late April, that President William McKinley called on each state to provide the needed troops based on its population and that numerous Southern states, predominantly in the Deep South, struggled tremendously to recruit helpers (volunteers) to fill their state proportion. In addition to this, Turpie on the truth of the matter that most middle-class and upper-class white men in the South did not trust that their manhood rested on their capability to fight in a war against Spain for Cuba’s freedom; and that their manhood and honor was found in only protecting their homes and family and not to fight in the war. His work is detailed and approachable for the reader(s) to learn and comprehend that yes, the South was still recovering from the devastation of the Civil War, but perhaps the major motive for the volunteer recruitment gaps in several southern states was that African-Americans were denied the opportunity volunteer from.
William Easterly's The White Man's Burden is about what its author calls the twin tragedies of global poverty. The first, is that so many are seemingly fated to live horribly stunted, miserable lives and die such early deaths. The second is that after fifty years and more than $2.3 trillion in aid from the West to address the first tragedy, it has shockingly little to show for it. We'll never solve the first tragedy, Easterly argues, unless we figure out the second. The ironies are many: We preach a gospel of freedom and individual accountability, yet we intrude in the inner workings of other countries through bloated aid bureaucracies like the International Monetary Fund and World Bank that are accountable to no one for the effects of their prescriptions. We take credit for the economic success stories of the last fifty years, like South Korea and Taiwan, when in
At the time that Rudyard published “The White Man’s Burden”, whites were already conflicted on what to do about the non-whites (US, 437). Some whites claimed that there should be little to no intervention of the whites on the non-white societies because Charles Darwin’s theory of “survival of the fittest” is the way that things should be (US, 437). The whites who were for intervention argued that it was the humane and religious duty of whites to become involved (US, 437). They also exclaimed that it was better to help the non-white develop because of the need for trade (US, 437). Because there had already been such a debate between the whites over this issue, Rudyard’s poem gained attention quick (lecture notes, 2/8). Rudyard’s work gained attention of American leaders and became an inspiration for future actions of imperialism (lecture notes, 2/8).
KAFFIR". After you see or hear this word, what runs through your mind? Does one