Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Plymouth Plantation: A Story of Religious Intent, or Monetary Gain
War between native americans and white
About plymouth plantation
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
“When is it lawful to declare war on one's enemies?” This is probably the most critical question that arises when examining the extensive topic of warefare. Moreover, this question is one that nearly every generation has, and will most likely need to address. The Pilgrims during the time of The Plymouth Plantation were required to make these types of determinations in their day. Likewise, we are required to make these ultimatums too. Are preemptive strikes allowable? The aforementioned and similar argumentative scenarios arise during difficult times and when under pressure. Nevertheless, we must determine when it is lawful to declare war on one's adversaries! To do so, we are going to examine the Pilgrims, our Cultures, and finally, Scripture's …show more content…
response to this inquiry. When the Pilgrims arrived in the New World, they faced many forms tribulations and distress.
The Pequots were a warlike tribe of Indians who attempted to covertly gain control of all the Indians in the New England territory. Obviously, they posed quite a problem for the colonists. Initially, they attempted to compromise with a peace treaty. The Indian tribe accepted the treaty that put in place guidelines that had to be met. Of course, it wasn't long afterwards, that said tribe starting assaulting the pilgrims. The Pequot tribe killed two important figures at the time and slaughtered the armed expedition sent out by the (Massachusetts Bay Colony) in response to these assassinations. Furthermore, the Pequot's sought to convince the Narragansetts to attack the pilgrims. Thus, the colonists didn't have any choice but to take up arms and defend their women and …show more content…
children. The United States has participated in both major and minor scale battles since its establishment. Our nation was built on the blood and tears of war. As a nation, we pride ourselves on our accomplishments and military prowess. On September 11, 2001, two planes filled with frantic, crazed passengers were flown right into the Twin Towers, one after the other. Another crashed near the Pentagon. Ultimately, the havoc wreaked was a direct attack on American soil. People died that day! In response to the infuriating atrocity, the US government declared war on Afghanistan. Based on both the destruction of the twin towers and the Taliban regime, war seemed the right action to take. That was in 2001. How about the War on Iraq in 2003? The war on Iraq was a “preemptive war”. Apparently, the Iraqis were developing “weapons of mass destruction”. As such, the US government regarded the event as a threat not only to its citizens, but also to its many allies. Now we are waging war against a Muslim Jihad group, called ISIS. Several weeks ago, they killed two American reporters and video taped the assassination. As the video clip circulated the Internet, many cowered in fear while others seethed with anger. Muslim Jihad's declare war on everyone who is not Muslim. In response to the death of two American and the threat of larger scale violence and fear, we sent missile strikes and armed ally Syrians. It is also true that we have lied and cheated our way into war for selfish purposes. When we probe the Scriptures for an answer to “When is just to declare war on one's enemies”, there are several passages that we can direct our thoughts towards. The laws in Deuteronomy assume that it is lawful to declare war in certain circumstances. One of the criteria, is self-defense. The Israelites needed to defend several times against attackers. (cf. Ex. 22:2-4; Deut. 20:1ff; Rom. 13:5). What justification motivated Abraham and Joshua to declare war in these passages and what principles can we gain from them? (Passages: Gen. 14; Josh. 10:1-11; Ps. 15:4). In each of these instances, both men waged war based on covenantal commitments. They went to war to rescue and/or free their allies. The Psalmist supports the notion that when we make an alliance with a person or nation, we are obligated to honor that oath whether or not it may hurt us in the process. The Proverbs (24 & 31) seem to promote the idea that it is the duty of the strong to protect the weak from oppression and imminent death. Of course, there are some who will take that principle to the extreme. Someone somewhere is always getting hurt or doing evil. Thus, we should always be at war. Of course, we know that such an argument is a misuse of the proverb. Utilizing the precepts gained from scripture we can officially answer the question: “When is it just to declare war on one's oppressors?” Consequently, three criteria must be met in order to declare war: 1.) When a nation has been assaulted by another.
2.) When allied nations are under attack. And 3.) When a more vulnerable or weaker nation is being thrown about and taken advantage of by another. Given these guidelines we can now make judgments on every single war in history as long as we understand their background. War is not a dazzling allurement. It is a horrific affair. Serious consideration should be taken before we jeopardize the lives and welfare of many precious souls. An interesting quote by Dwight D. Eisenhower gives us a unique look into the mind of one who experienced war in its fullest. Here is what he said: “Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired signifies in the final sense, a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, those who are cold and are not clothed. This world in arms is not spending money alone. It is spending the sweat of its laborers, the genius of its scientists, the hopes of its children. This is not a way of life at all in any true sense. Under the clouds of war, it is humanity hanging on a cross of
iron.”
On May 26, 1637, English settlers under Captain John Mason, and Narragansett and Mohegan allies set fire to a Pequot fort near the Mystic River. The fort only had two entrances, and anybody that tried to flee the fort was shot by awaiting enemies. The only Pequots that survived were those who had followed their sachem Sassacus in a raiding party outside the village. This attack on the fort almost entirely wiped out the Pequot population and resulted in them eventually losing the war. As a result of this the 1638 treaty of Hartford was signed, stating that all remaining Pequots were to be slaves, for the English and other tribes. This could have been the Start of slavery in the united states, and it could have also been an event that led to the enslaving of hundreds of thousands of Africans. This affected the United States greatly because, without this one battle, this country might not be as culturally diverse as it is today.
In Jamestown, the settlers had to deal with the Powhatan Indians. The relationships with them were unstable. John Smith, whom was the leader of Jamestown, was captured by these Indians while he was on a little trip with some of his men. As he left two of his men, he came back to find them dead and himself surrounded by two hundred members of the tribe, finding himself being captured. “Six or seven weeks those barbarians kept him prisoner…” 87). After this event, the relationship only grew worse and there was constant fighting between the settlers and Indians. The Indians practiced many methods in capturing settlers such as “scalping” and other dreadful techniques. The settlers did many negative practices also which is the reason they fought so many wars and battles against each other. Later on, the Indians killed the English for their weapons that were rare to them. In contrast to the Plymouth colony, these settlers dealt with the Pequot Indians and the relations were much more peaceful for a certain time frame. At one point, one Indian was brave enough to approach them and spoke to them (in broken English). He taught them the ways of the land, and developed a peace with the man. The settlers from the Plymouth colony learned many ways to grow food from these Indians. “He directed them how to set their corn, where to take fish and to procure other commodities, and was also their
...y robbing the Indians of their land, the English upset and hurt many of the Native American tribes, which lead to many disputes over ownership of the land.
Tensions between Americans and Indians rose due to the passive stance America courts took when dealing with hate crimes against Indians. Rumors centered around the idea of Indians encroaching on colonists’ land were widespread. Although fabricated, the gossip quickly escalated the already high tensions between the two cultures. Pennsylvania colonists discovered their precious tax dollars went towards providing aid to the many Indians who lived amongst them. Paxton, a village located in Pennsylvania, became the hotspot for disgruntled, committed radicals wanting to attack neighboring Indian tribes. The village of Paxton was primarily occupied by pacifist Quakers, so it was easy for the radicals to overpower the town. (Who Were the Paxton Boys?... 1). This city provided an organized meeting spot where radicals could conjugate and discuss plans. In December of 1763, men from the village of Paxton took up arms and raided a small tribe of Conestoga Indians (John H.
In 1675, tensions between Native Americans and colonists residing in New England erupted into the brutal conflict that has come to be known as King Philip's War, the bloodiest battle in America history, in proportion to population it was also the deadliest war in American history. The English colonists wished to rid the country of the Indians in order to seize their land. They believed the Indians were savages and therefore were not worthy of equal rights.
War is the means to many ends. The ends of ruthless dictators, of land disputes, and lives – each play its part in the reasoning for war. War is controllable. It can be avoided; however, once it begins, the bat...
Between 1763 and 1764, a group of Irish-Scots living in the backcountry of Pennsylvania encountered some conflicts with the neighboring Native American tribes. After the Seven Years’ War, a large number of immigrants rushed into the newly won land from the French. Soon, the population grew too great for the area and colonists were forced to move into the Indians land. The Natives were not a fan of this arrangement. Even though they felt this way, they never attacked the colonists. At the end of 1763, a group colonists attacked the Susquehannock for possible providing aid to the colonists´ enemies. At the end of the
The Pequot tribe inhabited most of Southeastern Connecticut when the colonists arrived to the new world. The Pequot were among the most feared tribes in Southern New England in relation to the colonists. Actually, the name “Pequot” is of Algonquian descent and translates to mean “destroyers”. As the Pequot were migrating westward continuous altercations with the colonists arose. One incident in particular led to the murder of an English man believed to be a traitor by the Pequot. John Endicott, of the Massachusetts Bay Colony, organized an attack against the Pequot in retaliation for the murder of the alleged traitor, John Oldham. On May 26, 1637 the Pequot were attacked by some colonists as well as the Pequot former tribesmen the Mohegan and Uncas. Nearly all the Pequot villages were burned and nearly all of the Pequot were killed. Some small groups did escape but most were found and either murdered or sold into slavery to other Indian nations as well as residents of the West Indies. After the “Pequot War”, the Pequot name was all but eliminated giving way to the Mohegan. The pride of the Pequot people and their immense hatred of the Mohegan tribe were very prevalent t...
Hardship is what unites us as a group of people who are working together for a common goal and sticks together and helps each other with hard work through rough times. Hardship unites us in difficult times and stressful situations. In the historical log, “Of Plymouth Plantation” written by William Bradford, he explains the hardship that explores dealt with there first few years of their settlement. It goes in depth as the struggle between diseases, nature, loss of food, and the bitter cold. More than half of the pilgrims died and only a few people could help the sick. It was not until the natives decided to set a peace treaty and help the
The New England colonists were in constant contact with Indians since their arrival. Conflict was unavoidable between the two polar opposite cultures. The colonists sought to convert the Indians into Christians and attempt to civilize the "barbarians." Also, the expansion of colonies into Indian Territory was a major concern among the Indian tribes. King Phillip's War was the result of the ongoing tensions between the two cultures. Both the colonists and the Indians grew increasingly suspicious of each other eventually leading to war.
The clash between the Native Americans and the colonists did not start off tumultuous. In the early days of the exploration and settlement of the New World they lived in peace. The Indians taught them how to farm and live off the land. In a strange land the colonists made an ally. However, the subsequent turn of events was inevitable. Perhaps the chaos that ensued could have been postponed but there was never going to be a peaceful cohabitation between the colonists and the indigenous people. There were so many vast differences between the religious views and ultimate goals of the two groups. The Native Americans had established trade relationships with various tribes, they had their own religions, and their way of life was a stark contrast to that of the colonists. The worldview of the respective peoples was foreign to the other and the idea of a holistic and unbiased approach to the life of others was foreign.
The French Colonists were very angry. The English were slowly moving over the Appalachian Mountains. Thereby invading the French fur trapper's land.
Since the settling of the English colonies in the early 17th century, pioneers have been destined to expand into the North American frontier and to domesticate it with their Christian faith and progressive nature. In their exploration of the frontier, however, the Puritan colonists often encountered Indians whose savagery challenged their discipline and morals. Just as the colonists expanded, Indians also saw their native lands of many years vanish. The situation naturally compelled the Puritans and the Indians to fight each other for their mutual interests. Thus, while most accounts of Western history focus on the heathen threat, both Indians and colonists experienced the harshness of the captivity myth and its evolution into other mythology that defined American history.
The Pequot War was a conflict between the Pequot tribe and the English colonists which occurred in the 1600’s. Throughout the course of the war the Pequot tribe lost about seven hundred members either by casualty or they were taken into captivity and sold into slavery. The Pequot worked forcefully to extend their area of control over several of the other tribes in the region. This created a large amount of tension between the tribes-the tribe intended for political dominance and control of the European fur trade. A harsh smallpox epidemic ravaged the tribal community over the previous three decades which greatly reduced the population due to lack of immunity to the disease. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pequot_War)
In the “Pequot War and King Philip’s War, Both of these are in response to English settlement and expansion, taking of Native American territory, resources, and people. The Pequot war, in 1637, was more of a massacre than a war. Massachusetts Bay Colonists used the neighboring Narraganset Indians to systematically slaughter the Pequots who were living on land they wanted. Those Pequots that were left were sold into slavery and sent to the English colony of Bermuda” (Griffin, PP11, 9/3/15). In King Phillip’s war, “the massacre is started by the Indians. 3 Wampanoags were charged with the murder of an Englishman. This is false, but the Indians are blamed. A group of Indians led by a man who called himself King Philip fought back and started killing