"The unexamined life is not worth living." This quote stated by the famous philosopher Socrates goes on to explain the importance of the study of philosophy and understanding the world in which humans inhabit. The study of philosophy seeks to contemplate and understand the many questions regarding existence and reality. Philosophy has the power to question everything that requires a deeper explanation or understanding. It is a study that helps us to discover the nature of truth and knowledge. Students attending a Catholic secondary school should be required to take a philosophy course for a number of reasons. The studying of the most important questions in existence results in gaining more understanding and wisdom. In accordance with reasoning, …show more content…
critical thinking has the ability to impact all areas of life and change the way that one thinks. Finally, philosophy plays an important role in relating to the real world. By studying philosophy, people can clarify what they believe and they can also be influenced to think about the ultimate questions in life. Philosophic thought is an escapable part of human existence. Philosophy derives from wonder, curiosity, and the desire to know and understand. Philosophy is a process of analysis, criticism, interpretation, and speculation - all of which contributes to the promotion of Thong 2 illumination and also understanding more about the meaning and importance of life itself and straying away from ignorant thoughts.
The famous theory, The Allegory of the Cave, written by Plato describes the human situation about ignorance and learning. In order to possess real knowledge and wisdom, we must gain it through philosophical reasoning. In the parable there is a cave in which prisoners are kept. Each one of them are chained so that their legs and necks are immobile and are forced to look at only the wall in front of them which project shadows of the unknown. One of the prisoners escapes from their bindings and goes off and ventures into the world. The prisoner begins to understand the new world and goes on a journey where he discovers beauty and true meaning. When he returns and tells the others of his findings, they find him to be wrong and reject his claims. This theory represents the journey of the philosopher from ignorance to understanding the truth. Being ignorant is to lack knowledge and when one gains knowledge one is also gaining wisdom. Humans seek to acquire knowledge which enables them to understand themselves and also helps them to advance in self-realization. Philosophy pursues questions in every dimension of human life in different fields such as Epistemology and Aesthetics, which examines all aspects of humanity. As a result, the more digging that is done in understanding and gaining knowledge about life, the more that the wise are willing to free …show more content…
themselves from the shackles of ignorance and come to understand the truth. Not only does philosophy give us perspective, but it also helps us to become more open minded towards the truth. Philosophy develops good habits of creative thought that helps to integrate the facts behind reasoning which enhances critical thinking skills. Critical thinking is the "reasoned Thong 3 reflection on the meaning of claims about what to believe or what to do" (VanDommelen, 6 February 2015).
In addition, it is thinking in accordance with standards of reasoning and being on guard against biases, prejudices, and stereotypes in our daily thinking. The Greek philosopher Socrates challenged peoples way of thinking by being the inspiration for the Socratic method. The Socratic method is the oldest and the most powerful teaching tactic for cultivating critical thinking. The questioner using the Socratic method acts as the logical equivalent of one's inner critical voice. It probes into the nature of the question, problem, or issue that is being focused on. One can inquire into whether or not there is relevant data and information, it considers any alternative interpretations of the data and information, and in addition, it analyzes key ideas and concepts. All of these, and more, are the main focus of the Socratic method. In the paper Fides et Ratio, it states, "... the ability to speculate which is proper to the human intellect produces a rigorous mode of thought; ... through the logical coherence of the affirmations made and the organic unity of their content, it produces a systematic body of knowledge" (Introductory Chapter: Fides et Ratio). Philosophy requires a demand for clarity and develops the ability to honestly acknowledge objections against one’s own conclusions. It allows the use for critical thinking skills to enable one to think at a deeper level which allows
one to be a reflective, creative, and holistic thinker. Philosophy can be seen as a dead science. At a time when advances in technology have changed our understanding of ourselves and the world around us, it is easy for some to dismiss the discipline of philosophy as being obsolete. However, this ignorant way of thinking is Thong 4 a prime example of how many people ignore the actual prevalence that philosophy has on everyday lives. Every institution of society is based on philosophic ideas such as the law, government, religion, marriage, business, and education. It plays an important role in relating to the real world. Philosophy makes a central contribution to the education through its demands upon intellectual activity and enhances the following skills such as problem solving, communication skills, persuasive powers, and writing skills. For example, if one wants to pursue the study of law, philosophy helps to create the ability to decipher and develop concrete arguments which is seen in the courts of law. As mentioned before, the Socratic method is beneficial to lawyers whom often use this method during cross examinations with witnesses in a trial. Moreover, philosophy is a study that is applicable to all fields of education. Courses such as English, Psychology, and Mathematics all relate to Philosophy by developing all of the same learning skills and reasoning helpful in being successful and furthering ones education. Using this abstract knowledge simply gives a clear perspective on showing the benefit of having a philosophical background to enhance everyday life. Philosophy allows for the exploration of truths and the ability to acquire a deeper level of thinking and understanding. It uses reasons, arguments, and theories as possible answers to existing questions. It allows for an open mind and an opportunity to enhance critical thinking skills which are important in everyday life. Not only is philosophy important in a classroom, but it can also help with future endeavors and careers one decides to pursue. For all the reasons stated above, students attending a Catholic secondary school should be required to take a philosophy course which will help them in the long run. Philosophy creates a deeper Thong 5 understanding of faith and of ourselves. It helps to challenge the mind and impacts the expansion of knowledge which always seeks out the revealed truth.
Plato’s “Allegory of the Cave” explains his beliefs on education of one’s soul and the core of the way they shape themselves. The rhetorical devices that Plato represents inside of his story explains how much freedom is worth in this world. The deeper meaning inside of what Plato describes can further be found out once a reader realizes the type of rhetorical devices are being used. For example, Plato portrays prisoners being locked inside of a cave without a way out. These prisoners never got to see the outside world, yet he mentions they “see shadows” which explains they are only able to catch a glimpse of reality from the outside. Plato’s use of imagery gives us a mental picture on the tease we may feel to notice reality but not be able to experience it. In reality, we do not value freedom as much as we are supposed to. We seem to not see the world as he sees it. With the help of personification, Plato uses human like characteristics to describe non-living things to give
In Plato’s “The Allegory of the Cave,” he suggests that there are two different forms of vision, a “mind’s eye” and a “bodily eye.” The “bodily eye” is a metaphor for the senses. While inside the cave, the prisoners function only with this eye. The “mind’s eye” is a higher level of thinking, and is mobilized only when the prisoner is released into the outside world. This eye does not exist within the cave; it only exists in the real, perfect world.
Plato’s logical strategy in the allegory of the cave is of deductive reasoning. Plato uses a cave containing people bound by chains which constrict their neck and legs in such a way that they are unable to turn around and there is a fire roaring behind them casting shadows on the wall. Since the prisoners cannot turn their heads to see what is casting the shadow the only thing they can perceive are the shadows and the sounds that seem to becoming from them. This is what Plato argues in the allegory of the cave “To them, I said, the truth would literally be nothing but the shadows of the images.”(The Allegory of the Cave Plato). Since these prisoners know nothing outside of the cave they are ignorant of the “light” and are content on seeing the shadows before them. Plato describes what it would be like for a prisoner to be released and forced to go out of the cave into the light Plato describes it as being “blinding”. Once the freed prisoner became accustomed to the light outside the cave it is believed by Socrates and Glaucon, inside Plato’s allegory that the prisoner would not want to return to the darkness from which he had “ascended”. Once the prisoner has become accustomed to the light Socrates said “I mean that they remain in the upper world: but this must not be allowed, they must be made to descend again among the prisoners in the den, and partake of their labors and honors, whether they are worth having or not”. (The Allegory of the Cave Plato) This is where Plato begins to start on the topic of leadership. Although Plato uses some cause and effect elements in his allegory, such as “Where as if they go to the administration of public affairs, poor and hungering after their own private advantage, thinking that henc...
Plato's "Allegory of the Cave" presents a vision of humans as slaves chained in front of a fire observing the shadows of things on the cave wall in front of them. The shadows are the only "reality" the slaves know. Plato argues that there is a basic flaw in how we humans mistake our limited perceptions as reality, truth and goodness. The allegory reveals how that flaw affects our education, our spirituality and our politics.
“In Plato’s Allegory of the Cave” it represents an allegory that signifies real life meaning.Plato’s “Allegory of the Cave” is about questioning the fundamental reality of experience.The information In Plato’s “Allegory of the Cave,” is interpreted with real life. I would say the genre of the allegory is nonfiction. It focuses on prisoners who are being held captive. They are being held inside of a cave.The prisoners cave freedom, however hopes being at an all time low due to the fact that the prisoners are bound and chained by the neck. The only thing to observe, a wall with shadows coming in from the fire light that blazes before them.The fire that blazed inside the cave would display shadows of other people walking throughout the cave holding
In the Allegory of The Cave, Plato states that "the prison world is the world of sight, the light of the fire is the sun, and you will not misapprehend me if you interpret the journey upwards to be the ascent of the soul into the intellectual world according to my poor belief". Everything described in the Allegory of The Cave holds a double meaning as a symbol for something else; the prison world symbolizes our world and the fire casting shadows on the walls of the cave is in actuality the sun. Only the sun isn 't just the sun, it is a representation of the good and the truth in this world. When one reaches this level of enlightenment, according to Plato they not only find the truth of their existence, but they also find the good in life, and
The Allegory of the Cave is Plato's explanation of the education of the soul toward enlightenment. He sees it as what happens when someone is educated to the level of philosopher. He contends that they must "go back into the cave" or return to the everyday world of politics, greed and power struggles. The Allegory also attacks people who rely upon or are slaves to their senses. The chains that bind the prisoners are the senses. The fun of the allegory is to try to put all the details of the cave into your interpretation. In other words, what are the models the guards carry? the fire? the struggle out of the cave? the sunlight? the shadows on the cave wall? Socrates, in Book VII of The Republic, just after the allegory told us that the cave was our world and the fire was our sun. He said the path of the prisoner was our soul's ascent to knowledge or enlightenment. He equated our world of sight with the intellect's world of opinion. Both were at the bottom of the ladder of knowledge. Our world of sight allows us to "see" things that are not real, such as parallel lines and perfect circles. He calls this higher understanding the world "abstract Reality" or the Intelligeble world. He equates this abstract reality with the knowledge that comes from reasoning and finally understanding. On the physical side, our world of sight, the stages of growth are first recognition of images (the shadows on the cave wall) then the recognition of objects (the models the guards carry) To understand abstract reality requires the understanding of mathematics and finally the forms or the Ideals of all things (the world outside the cave). But our understanding of the physical world is mirrored in our minds by our ways of thinking. First comes imagination (Socrates thought little of creativity), then our unfounded but real beliefs. Opinion gives way to knowledge through reasoning (learned though mathematics). Finally, the realization of the forms is mirrored by the level of Understanding in the Ways of Thinking. The key to the struggle for knowledge is the reasoning skills acquired through mathematics as they are applied to understanding ourselves. The shadows on the cave wall change continually and are of little worth, but the reality out side the cave never changes and that makes it important.
Freedom in mind, freedom in nature, and freedom in subjectivity of individual are three kinds of freedoms. However, freedom should be expressed within the limits of reason and morality. Having freedom equals having the power to think, to speak, and to act without externally imposed restrains. As a matter of fact, finding freedom in order to live free is the common idea in Plato with "The Allegory of the Cave"; Henry David Thoreau with " Where I lived and What I lived for"; and Jean Paul Sartre with " Existentialism". Generally, Plato, Thoreau, and Sartre suggested that human life should be free. They differ in what that freedom is. Plato thinks it is found in the world of intellect, Thoreau thinks freedom is found in nature, and Sartre thinks freedom is found in subjectivity of individual.
What is truly real, and what is not? This question is one which has been pondered deeply throughout human history, and it seemingly has no definitive answer. To understand what is truly a part of reality, and what isn’t, may be an impossible feat. However, two famous works created by humans from two distant time periods attempt to dissect and analyze this philosophical question. The first, The Allegory of the Cave, was written by the great Greek philosopher, Plato, who was born in 428 B.C. in Athens, Greece. The Allegory of the Cave is a piece of a larger work of Plato’s, The Republic, which is a collection of works concerning political philosophy. The Republic is his most famous work and what he is best known for in today’s world. The second
...rison to the allegory, one can best grasp the concept of knowledge and how the Sun and our senses guide our education. The concept of our knowledge being a result of our surroundings in the world, rather than a text book, is simply fascinating. How would those who questioned our Earth being round rather than the earlier beliefs of it being flat without believing that there is more than what is seen. The Wright brothers were considered heretics because they had believed man could fly. It was by asking questions that they could not have known to be true, that promotes progress and development in the world. To be able to ask questions in a Socratic fashion, to question what one does not know, is learning. Plato was truly a man well before his time, as he was able to ask the questions that were deemed most difficult in an age where religion dominated knowledge.
In the contemporary world , culture refers to something as vast as the distinctive way of life of an entire community. Culture is everywhere and everyone has it; it is the mass of ideas, traditions, habits, stories, beliefs, and perspectives on life passed on to us from generation to generation through literature, language, art, myth, religion, family, and various other social institutions. Plato had many different ideas when it comes to human behavior and philosophy. Some of those things can be applied to today’s society, some of them can’t. Plato’s Allegory of the Cave, which is probably his most famous theory, as well as Krishnamurti’s essay on cultural conditioning of a mind, they both focus on cultural values and living within a culture and can still be seen in today’s society.
In the essay “The Allegory of the Cave,” Plato addresses how humans generally do not pursue knowledge. Most humans are satisfied with what they already know and do not want to expand their knowledge. Plato uses simple examples to help the reader understand his logic on why humans do not expand their knowledge.
Whether it’s in the news, TV shows, or movies, it’s happening all the time. It also happens in our everyday personal lives. We get caught in a routine and keeping doing it and it bothers us if that routine is broken or that someone tells us that we should stop doing that daily routine. Plato wants us to look beyond the cave to see what is around us and what is real, not the fake reality that the world sometimes projects. Like Cooper in Interstellar, he stepped outside the “cave” to find a hope for humanity, and at the same time found the tesseract, or the outside of the “cave” again, and found the knowledge he needed to help his daughter figure out the gravity equation and save humanity from dying out. Plato wants us to spread the knowledge of what’s really out there, rather than be prisoners
In The Republic, Plato presents the relationship of the Divided Line and the Allegory of the Cave in connection to his epistemology and metaphysics. Throughout the Republic he discusses his beliefs on many topics using examples that express his ideas more thoroughly. He is able to convey very complex beliefs through his examples of the Divided Line and Allegory of the Cave. Plato’s epistemology depicts his idea of the Divided Line which is a hierarchy where we discover how one obtains knowledge and the Allegory of the Cave relates to Plato’s metaphysics by representing how one is ignorant/blinded at the lowest level but as they move up in the Divided Line, they are able to reach enlightenment through the knowledge of the truth.
The term “philosophy” means the love of wisdom, and those that study philosophy attempt to gain knowledge through rationality and reason. 1 Socrates, the father of ancient philosophy, once stated “the unexamined life is not worth living”. This is the most important part of life and it is need to find purpose and value in life. If a person chooses to live their life without examination, their life would lack value and they would be unhappy. They would also be ignorant to the effects of their choices on themselves and the people around them.