Plato Women

1478 Words3 Pages

A story that can surpass generations impacts the minds of its thinkers during the time period in which it was produced, therefore giving it the ability to live on for hundreds of years. Many arguments get refuted back and forth, where this dialogue lives forever in the pages of various works. Multiple themes stay constant through this debates, which is usually because they are important to those that are discussing them. A topic point that is usually stressed is justice, which ties along to equality for women. Although many older works do not specify what they exactly think about the status of women, the details reveal what the authors truly believe. Plato delves into various forms of justice within society and state to form his argument. …show more content…

Plato exploited women as a tool to have a more successful society. His approach to how he used women goes along with his philosophy of taking advantage every individual to create the best society imaginable is almost the same with he uses men, but there are certain aspects that differ and show Plato’s prejudice. This a reason for the confusion as to why many scholars believe Plato was for equal rights for women. Forde discusses how “ women are made equal in Plato's ideal city … only because Plato sees them as a pool of talent that can be put to work for the city”. Plato simply used citizens for the greater good of the state. Although he did somewhat elevate the status of women in his ideal state, Plato only did it for his ulterior motives. It was purely unintentional to potentially bring any justice to marriage. Even if he did ignore gender identity, he enforced superior gender status by his use of partnership. This can be displayed by the role of women when procreating. Pomeroy mentions that, “two times [Plato] refers to the women as the property of the male guardian”. Plato is clearly not advocating for the rights of women. He only used women for his own selfish reasons. Although the institution of marriage was eliminated; therefore removing the oppressive role of the wife, men were still able to discriminate their female partners by viewing them as property. This undoes any possible justice for women. Pomeroy also discussed how “the male guardians are chosen first, then appropriate women are to be selected to be given to them”. This enforced the fact that women are second class citizens whose opinions were not valued. Women were not allowed to hold the same preferences as men, which is wrong because it ignores what they want. Although Plato may have brought some justice to women, his problematic views of how women should interact in procreating cement

Open Document