Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay on impressionism
Essay on impressionism
Essay about impressionism art
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essay on impressionism
“To my mind, a picture should be something pleasant, cheerful, and pretty, yes pretty! There are too many unpleasant things in life as it is without creating still more of them” (P.A.R Quotes). Pierre-Auguste Renoir was an artist that put his heart and soul into a painting. Prior to Renoir there were many artists. Renoir was a man after diversity and difference in his paintings. He did not want to be like everybody else. He and many others felt this way, forming a new art called Impressionism. This new concept originated in France in the 1860’s. In 1874 Impressionism really took off, these artist were going against Realism in every way. These artist of Impressionism only became a group because they were rejected by the Salon des Refuses. Their …show more content…
paintings were not what people were used too. Renoir’s and other’s work was considered modern, with new technologies, and like nothing anybody had seen before. Impressionist artist were taking a stand against the norm and creating paintings so modern for its time. These rejected artists wanted their own Salon so Napoleon the 3rd allowed them to have it; people heard and flocked to it. From then on Impressionism was famous. The Impressionist had ideas to follow with the renovation of Paris. There were now new railroads, wide, tree-lined boulevards, and large apartment buildings. Also a new idea in science became relevant. This idea that what the eye saw was not always what the brain thought. This lead to Impressionism being understandable and not the normal painting of this time. As Paris was becoming more modern and turning into a metropolis, so was the art. Being different and now famous these artist had to really impress people. Impressionism was all about modernity. This way of painting was considered the first modern movement in painting. Instead of doing the normal fine finish and detail, these artist did more capturing the moment. No longer did Renoir paint in his studio but more in the streets and countryside; this being called painting en plein air. These painters rarely relied on realistic point of view, instead they used exactly what they saw. At this time in history the eye was studied heavily. The Impressionist focused on the perception of light, “to convey the passage of time, changes in weather, and other shifts in the atmosphere in their canvases” (Impressionism). They enjoyed using intense and pure color. Instead of mixing on the pallet they believed the eye would mix what it thought needed. They also used shadows in different colors, short brushstrokes, and brighter colors to really catch the eye. Impressionist no longer used linear perspective, instead used more brushstrokes to show the depth and shapes. Some people even criticized them for unfinished looking work, but they left it that way. Everything people had seen before, impressionist change and did it their way. They did not want to be normal or of the same, they wanted to be their own, unique form. And that is exactly what they did. One of Renoir’s most famous paintings was called Luncheon of the Boating Party.
This was an oil painting completed in 1881. This painting still remains to be the most popular work of art at The Phillips Collection. Renoir enjoyed painting busy scenes filled with people doing what they loved. In this painting the people are eating food, sipping wine, and mingling amongst each other. Upon looking at the painting our eyes go directly to the colors. Renoir used contrasts of colors such as deep blues, greens, and reds. There seems to be well thought out texture in the clothing of the people and in the background. The people all seem to be doing something, most are talking, and others are looking about. There seems to be a great deal of light coming from the opening in the background and sunlight beaming off the table. Renoir made sure there was a sense of movement, a way your eye follows the canvas. The brushstrokes seem to be heavy and thick with additional smaller ones to add composition. There is also a great sense of balance throughout the painting. A certain amount of people in the front of the canvas closely similar to the back of the canvas. This painting shows great deal of Impressionist style work. This is a scene from the modern life of some friends enjoying a Sunday
brunch. When I first saw this painting something about it stood out to me. My eyes directly went to the lady holding her dog trying to kiss him. As my eyes wandered around the scene all the character’s emotions stood out to me. They all have something on their face that tells a story, what they are thinking, or what they are feeling. I really enjoy the colors of this painting. There seems to be a pattern with the clothes. There are five people wearing dark blue, four wearing a cream color, and two wearing brown. This allows your eyes to go through the painting and point out groups of people easier. Also what catches the eye is that everybody is wearing some sort of hat. The tables are full of wine and food, showing this must be a restaurant of some sort. There is a sense of movement with the posts in the railing and the yellow hats, this allows the eyes to wander all around the painting. There is a great sense of light, no real dark spots which gives this painting a positive vibe. The bottles on the table give the painting a certain shape and atmosphere. Also with so many people in the painting there seems to be little space, which doesn’t bother them much. Overall this painting is full of modern life for these people. They are enjoying their time not thinking about the outside world. Renoir does a great job of expression and masters the depth in the painting.
During Vincent Van Gogh’s childhood years, and even before he was born, impressionism was the most common form of art. Impressionism was a very limiting type of art, with certain colors and scenes one must paint with. A few artists had grown tired of impressionism, however, and wanted to create their own genre of art. These artists, including Paul Gaugin, Vincent Van Gogh, Henri de Toulouse-Lautrec, and Paul Cezanne, hoped to better express themselves by painting ...
The painting is organized simply. The background of the painting is painted in an Impressionist style. The blurring of edges, however, starkly contrasts with the sharp and hard contours of the figure in the foreground. The female figure is very sharp and clear compared to the background. The background paint is thick compared to the thin lines used to paint the figures in the foreground. The thick paint adds to the reduction of detail for the background. The colors used to paint the foreground figures are vibrant, as opposed to the whitened colors of the Impressionist background. The painting is mostly comprised of cool colors but there is a range of dark and light colors. The light colors are predominantly in the background and the darker colors are in the foreground. The vivid color of the robe contrasts with the muted colors of the background, resulting in an emphasis of the robe color. This emphasis leads the viewer's gaze to the focal part of the painting: the figures in the foreground. The female and baby in the foreground take up most of the canvas. The background was not painted as the artist saw it, but rather the impression t...
When looking at the painting it gives us a glimpse of the past. It looks almost like a photograph. The fine detail from the building on the right with the statue on top. The citizens walking around.
“Renoir’s particular ambition was to paint works in joyful hues from which all trace of narrative is excluded” 1, quotes Jean LeyMarie author of Renoir; And truer words about Renoir’s work can not be spoken. Pierre-Auguste Renoir was a French born painter whose collaborations with other notable artists, among them Manet, Delacroix, and Monet 2, helped to influence and shape the budding Impressionist movement. The renowned painter began his humble upbringing in Limoges, France in 1841; The son of a tailor, his parents found him work with a porcelain decorator, which was the beginning of his lengthy career as an artist, and perhaps were his passion for translucent and luscious colors were established 3. While Renoir is well known for his paintings of women, couples, and various other human subjects, his work on flowers is equally as impressive. The work this essay will discuss is the painting Chrysanthemums, painted in 1881-82. Currently located in the Ryerson Collection in Gallery 201 of the Art Institute of Chicago.
All the artist during that time all portrayed similar ideas that were introverted abstract art. Artist started portraying common objects in an abstract expressionism that were aggressive and emotional. During this era, Basquiat and other similar artist created pieces that were rich in detail that demonstrated different aspects of life. During this art movement, many people considered it be controversial and didn’t find the artwork to be intriguing. This movement started in Germany and later on settled in the United States. Neo-Expressionists were sometimes called Neue Wilden (“The Wild Ones”). The word Expressionism was a movement in poetry and in paintings and this is usually would present the subjective
The visual appeal of the renovated city, along with other factors such as the high quality of the art schools, caused Impressionism to take off in Paris around this time (Thomson 2000: 19-20). Impressionist painters wanted to capture the present, not historical or idealistic scenes. For this reason, they painted boulevards, parks, train stations, and other places that were important to modern Paris life. Human figures were important subjects in their paintings, since one of the most effective ways to depict modern life is to show the people living in it.
We can see a clear representation of the impressionist that tended to completely avoid historical or allegorical subjects. In this painting, Monet’s painted very rapidly and used bold brushwork in order to capture the light and the color; include relatively small, thin, yet visible brush strokes. An insistence on what Monet called “a spontaneous work rather than a calculated one” – this in particular accounts for the sketchy and seemingly unfinished quality of the Impressionist paintings. In the texture, he played with the shadow and light and created variation in tone, he employs patches of depth and surface. The light in the painting come from back to the windmill, it is a light shines softly behind the houses and the windmill. He was shown each brushstroke in the painting. Balance is achieved through an asymmetrical placement of the houses and the most important the
The composition of the painting takes place with the square of the canvas. The square is approximately 5' x 5'. A black frame surrounding the painting protrudes approximately 4" off the canvas. There is a 1" inlay between the canvas and frame. From this square, Reinhardt breaks the composition into six equal squares in three even rows. Texture is no where to be found in the painting. No visual indication of the artist's brush stroke is present. No varnished glare is given off by the piece. The entire work, including the frame, is completely matte. The squares take up the entire canvas in a checkerboard type arrangement. Each square is a slightly different shade of blue-black. It almost becomes impossible to see the difference between each square. The middle squares in the top and bottom rows shift more towards blue than the rest of the squares. The division of these middle squares become more obvious than the others. When the painting is looked at from a distance, it is almost impossible to see any of the squares at all. When looking from a far, all a viewer can see is a blackish blue canvas. As you stare longer into the painting, a halo begins to form around the corners of the canvas, creating a circle inside the square. Once you look away from the canvas, the circle is gone. With this observation in mind, we could say that the painting most definitely relies on the viewer. A viewer is required to look at the piece for its full affect. We could say that the squares in the painting are self-contained.
This painting by Vincent Van Gogh is on display at the Art Institute of Chicago Museum, in the Impressionism exhibit. There are many things going on in this painting that catch the viewer’s eye. The first is the piece’s vibrant colors, light blues and browns, bright greens, and more. The brush strokes that are very visible and can easily be identified as very thick some might even say bold. The furniture, the objects, and the setting are easy to identify and are proportioned to each other. There is so much to see in this piece to attempt to explain in only a few simple sentences.
In this essay, I shall try to examine how great a role colour played in the evolution of Impressionism. Impressionism in itself can be seen as a linkage in a long chain of procedures, which led the art to the point it is today. In order to do so, colour in Impressionism needs to be placed within an art-historical context for us to see more clearly the role it has played in the evolution of modern painting. In the late eighteenth century, for example, ancient Greek and Roman examples provided the classical sources in art. At the same time, there was a revolt against the formalism of Neo-Classicism. The accepted style was characterised by appeal to reason and intellect, with a demand for a well-disciplined order and restraint in the work. The decisive Romantic movement emphasized the individual’s right in self-expression, in which imagination and emotion were given free reign and stressed colour rather than line; colour can be seen as the expression for emotion, whereas line is the expression of rationality. Their style was painterly rather than linear; colour offered a freedom that line denied. Among the Romanticists who had a strong influence on Impressionism were Joseph Mallord William Turner and Eugéne Delacroix. In Turner’s works, colour took precedence over the realistic portrayal of form; Delacroix led the way for the Impressionists to use unmixed hues. The transition between Romanticism and Impressionism was provided by a small group of artists who lived and worked at the village of Barbizon. Their naturalistic style was based entirely on their observation and painting of nature in the open air. In their natural landscape subjects, they paid careful attention to the colourful expression of light and atmosphere. For them, colour was as important as composition, and this visual approach, with its appeal to emotion, gradually displaced the more studied and forma, with its appeal to reason.
The impressionist movement is often considered to mark the beginning of the modern period of art. It was developed in France during the late 19th century. The impressionist movement arose out of dissatisfaction with the classical, dull subjects and clean cut precise techniques of painting. They preferred to paint outdoors concentrating more on landscapes and street scenes, and began to paint ordinary everyday people and liked to show the effects in natural light.
The Luncheon of the Boating Party by Pierre-Auguste Renoir, is a very good piece of art. The artist well executed the use of shape and form. At first glance you can already tell what the artist was going for in the piece. A bunch of people under a gazebo, at a table with food, drinks and other objects, it has to be some sort of get together. By the texture of the painting you can tell the get together is outside, maybe even at a dock for boats like it says in the title. From the texture you can also tell what kind of clothes were accessible in the late 1800s. The artist did a good job using value to his advantage. From looking at the painting you can tell it wasn't nighttime, but sometime in the afternoon. The way Renoir used space was good,
For this assignment, I chose to look at “Luncheon of the Boating Party” by Auguste Renoir. I had never seen this painting before, so I thought it would be good to do my formal analysis on it. I think the subject of this painting is friendship as well as relationships. It looks like it is meant to be a realistic painting, and I think it does a good job of showing that.
In order to explore new venues of creativity Modernists tinkered with the perception of reality. During the Renaissance, the depiction of a subject was very straight forward. A painting had to look like what it represented. The truth was absolute and right and wrong were clearly defined. For Modernists, the world is much more obscure. In Impressionist paintings, lines are not definite and things tend to blur together. Faces usually do not differentiate one person from another.
This oil painting is set in the 1800’s according to the author’s time period that he was alive. The context of the painting has the setting take place on a train with three people in the viewer’s perspective: a seated lady