Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Photos are a powerful tool journalist’s use to summarize a story, highlight an event, motive people, and many other forms of visually communicating a story with viewer. When it comes to picking a photo to go with a story proper ethics should carefully considered. Intrusions of privacy or graphic images are a couple of ethical problems journalists face. As a Christian, we don’t have to exploit it, but using our faith is important to guiding our decisions and choices we make as writers or photojournalist. Daniel Okrent makes a few solid points in the article, “No Picture Tells the Truth. The Best Do Better Than That.” Okrent states that, “The surpassing power of pictures enables them to become the permanent markers of enormous events.” This is true, because when you think back on historical moments that you read about or saw on Television, …show more content…
those images stay planted in your mind. We are not always there to bare witness to these events, so we rely on photos journalist capture the truth of what is going on in the world around us. However, Okrent mentions that no picture captures the entire event therefore only tells half the story. “A picture can tell part of the truth, but not the whole truth. Editors know that. Readers and viewers should recognize it, too.”() If a photo doesn’t show the whole truth, then we should be very selective about the photos that we use to convey the event. Journalist sort through hundreds or photographs before picking one to use for a story, and sometimes the images cause controversy. Weather a photo is perceived as unethical or not, is subjective to the audience. This makes it difficult for journalists to decide what photos to use, because they are often criticized for “sanitizing” conflict if they avoid graphic photos, while at the same time exploiting the pain of others. Different cultures and worldviews may interpret the message being send by the photos differently. As journalists it is important to think of the audience and try to find a middle ground. As an example, the image the image The New York Times choose to publish of a photo a devastated mother kneeling beside the dead body’s of many children.
The photo was used to supplement an article on the devastation of an undersea earthquake in the Indian Ocean and a third of the children had died. The editor who chose the picture, Jill Abramson, said it fit the article and showed the enormity of the disaster. The photo received a lot of criticism and many said this was unethical. Yes, the photo shows devastation, but are we really seeing the enormity of the disaster or just sever dead bodies? Other photos could have been choose, like damage done to a schools or houses where children gather, but we are shown their lifeless bodies instead. To me this doesn’t show the enormity of the disaster, we know from the title that many children had died, we don’t need to see it, to know it. As a Christian I don’t think it is ethical or necessary to post pictures of the dead in the news. The only time photos of the dead in news should be posted is to server a purpose to indentify a body, much like they did during World War
II. Christian values are humanistic, placing emphasis on the value of life and the golden rule of treating others with respect, as you would like to be treated. Maintaining integrity in both personal and a professional work place is very important to ones faith. We can use photos to show the wrong of the world but there is a line to draw when it comes to gruesome photos. “Let no corrupting talk come out of your mouths, but only such as is good for building up, as fits the occasion, that it may give grace to those who hear.”(Ephesians 4:29, KJV) While this passage refers to mostly story content in journalism. It can apply to the photos used as well. Instead generating negative controversy with photos, why not find away we can motive people and build them up. Using our faith to guide our decisions and choices we make as writers or photojournalist, can be important to how the people view the world through our lenses. There are times when some photos are appropriate and then times when better choices could have been made, like in the example of the dead children. We should value people’s lives like our own and treat others with respect. “Let each of you look not only to his own interests, but also to the interests of others.”(Philippians 2:4, KJV)
An image has the explicit power of telling a story without saying any words, that’s the power behind a photo. A photo tends to comes with many sides to a story, it has the ability to manipulate and tell something differently. There is a tendency in America, where explicit photos of war or anything gruesome occurring in the world are censored for the public view. This censorship hides the reality of our world. In “The War Photo No One Would Publish” Torie DeGhett centers her argument on censorship, detailing the account of graphic Gulf War photo the American press refused to publish. (73) DeGhett argues that the American public shouldn’t be restrained from viewing graphic content of the war occurring around the world. She believes that incomplete
Having such an image before our eyes, often we fail to recognize the message it is trying to display from a certain point of view. Through Clark’s statement, it is evident that a photograph holds a graphic message, which mirrors the representation of our way of thinking with the world sights, which therefore engages other
I glance amusedly at the photo placed before me. The bright and smiling faces of my family stare back me, their expressions depicting complete happiness. My mind drifted back to the events of the day that the photo was taken. It was Memorial Day and so, in the spirit of tradition my large extended family had gathered at the grave of my great grandparents. The day was hot and I had begged my mother to let me join my friends at the pool. However, my mother had refused. Inconsolable, I spent most of the day moping about sulkily. The time came for a group picture and so my grandmother arranged us all just so and then turned to me saying, "You'd better smile Emma or you'll look back at this and never forgive yourself." Eager to please and knowing she would never let it go if I didn't, I plastered on a dazzling smile. One might say a picture is worth a thousand words. However, who is to say they are the accurate or right words? During the 1930s, photographers were hired by the FSA to photograph the events of the Great Depression. These photographers used their images, posed or accurate, to sway public opinion concerning the era. Their work displayed an attempt to fulfill the need to document what was taking place and the desire to influence what needed to be done.
The motivations behind why photos were taken will be explored, such as propaganda, as well as reactions to them. Research into events being photographed, their intentions and who requested them will be made, also assessing its effect on the public determining success. B. SUMMARY OF EVIDENCE Battle field photography was not developed for the sole purpose of recording events as would a newspaper or painting. Battlefield photography brought intense images directly from the field to the public, bringing the horrors of war to families so far from their husbands and sons (Niller). The photography institution brought the reality of war to the public in manners newspapers were incapable of (Harvey 73).
While Ephron argued that photos of death and war should be published just because it happened, but those photos do have some purpose. They are to preserve history, accurately record events, and be able to convey strong messages to readers. Photojournalism should be able to open minds of readers because the stories do not necessarily have to be told in a picture. Stories of war and death must be respected and honored, so these kinds of stories should not be unmentioned nor censored. They should be remembered. Also, photojournalism should not be abused in any sort to keep the integrity of the stories being captured. Ephron had said, “photojournalism is often more powerful than written journalism,” because it can cause a quicker response. Photojournalism is not only a piece of news, but it is also art. Works of art have the right to be expressed and shown to the
In today's world, photographs are the most form of media to deliver news and messages. They depict the mere fact, but are censored to hide violence. Such an act conceals the reality of life and is unfair. Graphic images must always be exposed to the public as they present the blatant reality and educate people about world crisis.
...her and the more modern case of Brian Walski demonstrates the importance of ethics in the mass media. With the public dependent on photographers for images that will give an accurate and true representation of the facts, in some cases even leading to such important decisions as giving relief aid, waging war, or determining votes in an election, it is vitally important that journalistic images be true and unaltered likenesses of real persons and events. Even apparently innocent misrepresentations, designed to create a better image or better prove a point, can have serious consequences for the photographer, the subjects of the image, and the public. It is a reminder of the importance of honesty in all professions.
A picture is more than just a piece of time captured within a light-sensitive emulsion, it is an experience one has whose story is told through an enchanting image. I photograph the world in the ways I see it. Every curious angle, vibrant color, and abnormal subject makes me think, and want to spark someone else’s thought process. The photographs in this work were not chosen by me, but by the reactions each image received when looked at. If a photo was merely glanced at or given a casual compliment, then I didn’t feel it was strong enough a work, but if one was to stop somebody, and be studied in curiosity, or question, then the picture was right to be chosen.
I’ve always wondered how a single image could show a beautiful lie or a horrific truth of any picture taken. No picture can be considered obvious. My mind is always thinking about the many different perspectives that one picture can bring. That’s why I enjoy taking photos that captures the many mysteries of life. I would love to live life as a photographer.
The Civil War was the first major conflict to be documented by photography. At the time of the Civil War, it was vital to have public support on both the North and the South side of the dispute. It is also said that if war efforts do not have complete support of its’ citizens that it will not result to any benefits. Photography was one way that was almost guaranteeing support of citizens on the homefront. Photographers had power within their photographs, toying with the pathos of the civilians, and causing them to feel whatever the photographers wanted them to. This power was abused at time by manipulating people’s opinions towards the war. There were pictures coming back from the warfront one after the other which made it impossible for people to feel an emotional connection to the soldiers at war. These photographs allowed events happening miles away to feel like they were closer to home causing people to support the war efforts more heavily. Instead of people having their own opinions during the war, photographers used manipulative
For this source I chose the article, In Plato 's cave by Susan Sontag. The source talks about all of the different ways society looks at photographs. In the quote by Sontag she says,
Photojournalist Mark Hancock once wrote: “A journalist tells a stories. A photographer takes pictures, a photojournalist takes the best of both and locks it into a powerful medium”(Newton, 236). For many years visuals such as photos have been used to add context to an article, photos can allow the reader to relate and understand the story better. Rather than just reading about an event, photo’s that accompany a story connect the viewer to the story in ways that words cannot. That being said, although photojournalist photos are meant to be transparent and accurate, it is becoming more and more apparent that news outlets and freelance photojournalists are manipulating and photo shopping images. Photojournalist are constantly finding themselves
Although the family photograph I submitted reminds me of easy times, family and years of innocent youth, it also makes me question if what I think of when I see the photo is truly accurate. Ironically enough, photos have the unique capability to reflect happiness and honestly but truly stand for sadness and inaccuracy. No one person can tell another what is being truly represented within the photograph due to the inherent objectivity of the viewer. Any other practice or imposition of views would result in the tarnishing of the viewer’s personal deduction of the pictures relevance/meaning. Although photographs [especially family photos] have the ability to speak a thousand words, we may never know which of these words are mere lies.
Newton, Julianne H. The Burden of Visual Truth: The Role of Photojournalism in Mediating Reality. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2001. Print.
Photography has created an outlet for the masses to story tell. It has a way of speaking without words like most art forms and is a manner of expression in itself. To eradicate photography from humans would be equivalent to taking away a limb from humankind. Our society has grown an immense amount of dependency on it. Photography has become almost a daily menial task such as brushing your teeth; where we must take pictures of the things we deem important or equally unimportant, even more so with the invention of social media outlets such as Instagram and Snapchat, where photography is the main source of communication between people who use them. Susan Sontag offers the basis of what taking pictures can undertake in both our daily lives and moments that are not part of our daily lives, such as travel. Traveling to places where one is not accustomed can flare pent up anxiety. A way to subdue that anxiety could be through taking pictures, since it’s the only factor that we have total control over in a space where we don’t have much, or, any control of our surrounding environment. On the other hand, taking photos can also be a tool of power in the same sense as it allows for it to be a defense against anxiety. With the camera in our hands, we have the power to decide who, what, where, when, and why we take a picture. This in turn also gives the person who took the picture power over those who later analyze the photos, letting them decide the meaning of the photo individually, despite the intended or true meaning.