Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Which theories explain criminal behavior the best
P3: Describe two theories of criminal behaviour and factors that contribute to them
Theories of criminal behaviour: Classical Theory
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Which theories explain criminal behavior the best
Early biological theorists, such as Franz Gall proposed a theory known as phrenology. Developed during the 18th century, phrenology is the study of the shape and size of the cranium as a supposed indication to criminality (Schmalleger, 2014). Gall centered his theory on the basis that the brain is the organ of the mind, personality traits are located in specific parts of the brain, and the shape of the skull is indicative of personality. Based on his theory, prominent character traits could be determined by measuring the area of the skull that overlies the corresponding area of the brain (What is Phreneology, n.d.). His theory became widely accepted by many other theorists in his field and replaced the prior notion that personality traits …show more content…
The main concepts of positivism are that social phenomena are observable, explainable, and measurable in quantifiable terms. Biological theorist, Cesare Lombroso, was at the forefront of the positivist school and is considered by many to be the father of modern criminology based on his scientific studies on postmortem prisoners. Throughout his studies, Lombroso came up with the term atavism based on the biological evolutionary work of Charles Darwin. Atavisms is a term that proposes that criminal behavior is the product of a lack of biological evolution in an individual and as a result are more prone to primitive urges. One of his most noteworthy cases to reinforce his theory was when he examined a criminal, named Vilella. Lombroso, observed that Vilella’s brain had an unusual depression, which closely resembled the brain found in lower apes (Washington and Lee University, n.d.). In total, he conducted studies on twenty-five thousand inmates of prisons all over Europe and used the data to observe their shared characteristics. Then in the 1940’s, two theorists, Emst Kretschmer and William Sheldon developed a theory similar to Lombroso’s, called Constitutional Theories, but focused on the body …show more content…
46). Depending on the shape and size of a person’s body, the theory will categorize a person’s mental tendencies into one of three categories known as, cycloid, schizoids and displastics. Cycloids are endomorphs, which means a person has a soft, heavyset body frame. Kretschmer noted that cycloids personality traits ranged from normal to abnormal and are only capable of committing nonviolent property types of offenses (Schmalleger, 2014). Conversely, schizoids possess a mesomorphic body type that are athletic and muscular and tend to commit violent crimes and are more prone to be schizophrenic. Lastly, displastics consist of a mixture of body types, but are described to be highly emotional and unable to control themselves. As a result, displastics would most likely commit crimes of passion. Further expanding on Kretschmer’s work, Sheldon believed that the age groups of Kretschmer’s studies were too
Flourens' experiments, as well as many in the field of physiological psychology involved in great part injuring or impairing a section of the nervous system and then observing resultant changes in behavior. Indeed, much scientific discovery stems from observation of impairment-using disability as a way to understand ability. This method is a bit of turning observations on their heads-what one observes in a damaged patient might provide clues as to what one would observe in a healthy patient. This sort of process of elimination method of observation is an especially applicable tool when the structures and functions involved are little understood. In the case of locating where aspects of personality may come from, this is definitely true-much is left unexplained about what creates a human sense of individuality and character.
Sociologists from the older positivist perspective believed that deviant determinism was based on biological factors. Phrenology is an example that is based on biological factors. It “is the doctrine that proposes that psychological traits of personality, intellect, temperament and character are ascertainable from analysis of the protrusions and depressions of the skull” (Vukin, 2009, para. 2). Phrenology in this aspect was used to determine whether or not a person would contribute to society in a ...
1. Cesare Lombroso applied the methods of natural science (observation, measurement, experimentation, statistical analysis) to the study of criminal behavior. Lombroso rejected the classical theory of crime, associated with Cesare Beccaria and Jeremy Bentham, which explained criminal activity as freely chosen behavior based on the rational calculation of benefit and loss, pleasure and pain. Critically analyze both schools of thought and provide an opinion as to what theory you believe is more relevant.
Up until the 19th century, Classicist ideas dominated the way in which people looked at crime. However during the late 19th century a new form of “scientific criminology” emerged, called Positivism (Newburn, 2007). Positivism looked at the biological factors on why someone would commit a crime, this involved looking at the physical attributes of a person, looking at their genetic make-up and their biochemical factors.
The first well known study of crime and criminals is that of one who is often referred to as the ‘father of criminology’, Cesar Lombroso. Lombroso’s argument was based around the Darwinian theory of human evolution and his theory argued that criminals were a throw back to an earlier period of human progression. In other words, they were less evolved humans, with visible physical features such as large ears and big lips. His theory suggested that criminals were born and not made therefore, where genetically prone to criminality. Merton’s argument was to the contrary.
In the early 1920’s the Swiss psychologist Carl Jung developed a theory of personality types where he said behavioral differences were “a result of preferences related to the basic functions our personalities perform throughout life” (p. 8). Jung’s theory was published in his book titled Personality Types in 1923.
Personality is a term that has largely been considered an unproblematic concept and primarily refers to the varying kinds of characteristics of individuals. Despite this assumption, psychologists have constantly used the word in different ways. The varying views in the use of this concept or term are fueled by the fact that psychology usually makes generalizations regarding individuals. Generally, personality seeks to examine the many differences and similarities between individuals. Formal evaluation and study of personality have mainly focused on patterns of similarities versus patterns of differences among individuals. When evaluating patterns of differences, the concept of abnormality has emerged and attracted huge concerns among psychologists. Since the issue is controversial, there are concerns whether individual differences in personality can be effectively explained with reference to genes.
In 1808, Franz Joseph Gall who was a German anatomist discovered that reading the configuration of bumps on the skull can determine a person's character, this is when the study of the brain started to broaden. In 1848, a man named Phinease Gage who was a North American railway worker suffered damage to the frontal lobe of the brain due to the piercing of a metal rod through the skull. Gage survived the accident but his mood and his daily life changed. Because of no treatment due to the lack of knowledge he was unable to work because of aggression (A short history of brain research – 1st Century to 1872). Because this was not the main concern, his behavior remained a
For example, in Marshall Hall and Pierre Flourens’ exploration of the brain, they attempted to map out brain functions. While Hall was able to locate the root of voluntary and involuntary movement in the brain, Flourens assigned physical locations on the brain to different vital functions of the brain, including, but not limited to: auditory and visual reflexes, heartbeat, respiration, higher mental processes, and coordination. While Descartes’ was able to theorize about the functions of the brain as a whole, Hall and Flourens expanded upon his original theory and they revealed the functions of individual parts of the brain. Also exploring the brain, Franz Joseph Gall wanted to know whether or not the shape or the size of the brain could reveal something about a person or animal’s personality characteristics or intelligence. Gall attempted to “map the brain from the outside” (70), and his research reinforced the belief that specific brain functions could be generally localized. While Gall failed in his effort to map the brain from the outside, he was able to distinguish white or gray matter and to further Descartes ' evolving
The first argument put forward to explaining female crime was by Lombroso and Ferrero. They argued that the explanation was biological, stating that criminality is innate, but due to biological differences, very few females born with this trait. Lombroso argued that criminals represented a reversion to a more primitive state, physical traits being – ears of an unusual size, a sloping forehead and asymmetry of the face. This theory of physical differences was late disproved by Charles Goring in the English Convict, 1913 who found insignificant statistical differences between non criminals and criminals.
Ceasare Lombroso is one of the first scholars that developed ideas to explain the reasons why some people behaved more deviant than others or committed crimes. Lombroso conducted research on several prisoners measuring facial features and skull size. He later published a book called “the criminal man in 1876” (Dwyer, 2001 p.15). Lombroso believed that there was two different types of human beings, those who had evolved properly and another which did not. They were more primitive an...
In all historical aspects, psychology can show us the diverse ranges of how it is evolving throughout our world today. Ancient Greeks and philosophers in the 4th century, show us the early development of personality psychology. They wanted to figure out what actually makes us who we are. Aristotle was one of the first individuals to hypothesize connections between physical aspects of the body and behavior. Today there are many different theoretical vi...
Theories that are based on biological Factors and criminal behavior have always been slightly ludicrous to me. Biological theories place an excessive emphasis on the idea that individuals are “born badly” with little regard to the many other factors that play a part in this behavior. Criminal behavior may be learned throughout one’s life, but there is not sufficient evidence that proves crime is an inherited trait. In the Born to Be Bad article, Lanier describes the early belief of biological theories as distinctive predispositions that under particular conditions will cause an individual to commit criminal acts. (Lanier, p. 92) Biological criminologists are expected to study the “criminal” rather than the act itself. This goes as far as studying physical features, such as body type, eyes, and the shape or size of one’s head. “Since criminals were less developed, Lombroso felt they could be identified by physical stigmata, or visible physical abnormalities…characteristics as asymmetry of the face; supernumerary nipples, toes, or fingers; enormous jaws; handle-shaped or sensible ears; insensibility to pain; acute sight; and so on.” (Lanier. P. 94). It baffles me that physical features were ever considered a reliable explanation to criminal behavior. To compare one’s features to criminal behavior is not only stereotypical, but also highly unreliable.
After Comte and Darwin developed their theories about the world, they were followed by several criminologists who also believed that science could answer many of the problems that were present in society, particularly in the field of criminology. One of these men was Cesare Lombroso, who was the first to actually focus on criminology as a science (Adler et al 2012). Lombroso believed criminals could be identified because of physical differences between them and non-criminal members of society (Adler et al 2012). In order to recognize these people he created what he called the "atavistic stigmata" which are characteristics exhibited by humans who were less developed (Adler et al 2012:66). Individuals who exhi...
The first theory to be explored is the hereditary theory, which stems from Cesare Lombroso (1876) father of criminology, (Feldman, 1993) whose studies were carried out by morphology. Lombroso tried to show a relationship between criminal behaviour and physical characteristics. Lombrosco suggested that an individual was predisposed to becoming a criminal, as a result of internal or innate characteristics, rather than environmental factors.