Philosophy Of Lao Tzu

776 Words2 Pages

The paper explores the nature of the ‘Truth’ through the lens of Chinese ancient philosophy of Lao Tzu. Unlike other epistemologists, Lao Tzu holds a very different and unique perspective on the nature of the truth. Tao Te Ching is the most significant treatises in Chinese cosmogony (Giles, 1947) and by exploring his teaching, we will discuss the inexpressible, immutable and permanent nature of the truth. The understanding of Lao Tzu is very complex because he speaks opposite to the rational scheme of the human beings. Verily, the teaching of Lao Tzu is contradictory because the human being is used to think rationally whereas, Lao Tzu talks of simplicity (Osho, 2001). In addition, Lao Tzu states that truth cannot be expressed because it …show more content…

Kaun-tzu explore this idea further by stating that all the ‘things’ have definite forms; and in consequence, the forms have definite names. Therefore, the name comes after form (Yun-Hua et al., 1975) and in general, “anything that has a form can be easily destroyed" (Liao, 1959). Lao Tzu believes that forms meant the size and shape of things (Chapter, 4) and as Tao has no such form, therefore, it has no such name (Liao, 1959). Names serve to delimit, to set boundaries (Osho 2001); in contrast, Dao is without limits and therefore, cannot be captured fully by language (Chan, 2001). In the favor of Lao Tzu, Hang-fei-Tzu critiques that the truth which first exists and next goes to ruin, now lives and then dies, and prospers at the beginning and declines afterward, cannot be said to be eternal (Liao, 1959). Lao Tzu states that all material things are in the process of transformation, whereas Tao is the eternal principle of every form. Hence, we cannot designate Tao with any name (Mair, 1997). In the Adi Granth, Guru Nanak states in the moolmantra that there is only one God and He is the only Truth (Trumpp et al, 2004). Lao Tzu and Guru Nanak share the same grounds for the nature of the truth. Like Lao Tzu, Guru Nanak also states that one can’t comprehend the truth (God), even if one reasoned for ages. In fact, he is beyond reason (Trumpp et al, 2004). Most precisely, the description of the inexpressible nature of truth is also exists in the work of Lii-shih ch'un-ch'iu (1842): “Tao is one(permanent). Its origin is unknown and its manifestations (literarily, 'corners') are unknown; its beginning and end are unknown and He is beyond the constraints of words, i.e. chapter 35”. Nevertheless, taking into account all the available evidences, it seems that Laozi inexpressible nature of the truth separates

Open Document