Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Significance of experimental psychology
A classic series of experiments by Stanley Milgram demonstrated the profound effect of…
Mark Twain's morality
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Significance of experimental psychology
Philip Zimbardo posed the questions “What happens when you put good people in an evil place? Does humanity win over evil, or does evil triumph?” (par. 1). Zimbardo is a renowned psychologist who is a professor at Stanford University. Mark Twain wrote an essay titled “The Lowest Animal” where he answered those questions, and stated that mankind is inherently cruel. Twain argues that since humans have a moral sense of good and bad and still commit wicked acts of cruelty it would mean that humanity is in fact cruel. Twain is right because many psychological experiments have proved this. Some humans may be kind, but the facts and research proving humanity is cruel outweigh and overshadow those people.
Over the past seventy-five years many psychology
…show more content…
Here Stanley Milgram used randomly picked people to be a part of the experiment. He wanted to see how far people were willing to go to please an authoritative figure. Two people were used for the experiment, the teacher and the learner. The roles were assigned by drawing lots, then they would go into seperate rooms. In one room sat the student, he had electrodes attached to his arms. In the other room sat the teacher. The electrodes from the learner were attached to a circuit panel with numbers of volts ranging from fifteen volts to four-hundred fifty volts. The teacher would ask the learner simple memory questions. If he got it right they would move on but if he got it wrong he would be shocked. Every time the teacher shocked the learner the volts would be increased by fifteen …show more content…
This would mean that when the group with the later invite time would walk up they would see all the food had already been eaten. This caused even more tension between the groups and resulted in physical violence such as fist fights. This also caused the groups to vandalize and steal. As said here by Saul Mcleod, “The Eagles burned the Rattler's flag. Then the next day, the Rattler's ransacked The Eagle's cabin, overturned beds, and stole private property. The groups became so aggressive with each other that the researchers had to physically separate them.” (par. 10). The researchers took notes of how easy it was to turn two similar groups against each other. In two weeks Sherif had kids who did not know each other prior fighting and stealing from each other. The results of this experiment prove humanity is cruel because instead of coming together to help both sides the boys competed to benefit the group they were
The experiment began with Milgram placing an advertisement in the local newspaper to recruit volunteers for his experiment. The experiment began with the introduction of the other participant, the other participant being an ally of Milgram’s. Afterwards, each participant would draw straws to decide which role they would take up, the “teacher” or the “learner.” However, the decision was always fixed so that the participant would always end up being the teacher. The learner would then be strapped to an electric chair by the teacher and would have a list of words read to him to be
Twain makes his argument that humans are greedy with concrete examples and irony. With the description of the slaughtering of buffalo he depicts it as a “charming sport” (Twain pg 1) with the killing of “seventy-two of those great animals…[and] left seventy-one to rot”( Twain pg 1). He uses the word charming to describe
(Hook). Mark Twains comparison of human and animal behavior in "The Damned Human Race" can be identified with by a wide audience. His notoriety as one of the most famous American writers makes his opinion valuable to readers. Twains presentation of the material leads the reader to make factual assumptions on the actions a mankind. He appeals to the reader by focusing on basic ideas and using emotional charged vocabulary to invoke a strong response. Logically comparing conflicting behavior aids Twains argument that humans actions are substandard in comparison to animals. The overall argument of mankind's degradation from animals is successfully argued through the use of emotional appeal and logical reasoning.
With this research, Milgram uses two participants that were a confederate and an actor who looked authoritative. As each participant participated in the experiment, each one was to draw pieces of paper from a hat that determined if they were either a teacher or a learner. Yet, the drawing was manipulated so that the subject would become a teacher and the associate was the learner. The learner was confined to a chair and wired up with electrodes that were attached to the shock generator in the adjacent room. There were questions that were proposed to the learner and for every answer that was wrong, the subject was to conduct an electric shock.
The learners were a part of Milgram’s study and were taken into a room with electrodes attached to their arms. The teachers were to ask questions to the learners and if they answered incorrectly, they were to receive a 15-450 voltage electrical shock. Although the learners were not actually shocked, the teachers believed they were inflicting real harm on these innocent people.... ... middle of paper ...
In Mark Twain’s essay, “The Damned Human Race,” he uses a sarcastic tone in order to show that humans are the lowest kinds of animals and ar not as socially evolved as they think they are, making his readers want to change. In order to inspire his audience, Twain motivates them by providing specific comparisons between animals and humans. These satiric examples emphasize the deficiencies of the human race and entice them to change for the better.
...e maximum shock level dropped significantly. The more official the experimenter looked, the more people would reach the maximum shock level. Stanley Milgram’s findings were groundbreaking. He found that humans will comply and obey ones orders than previously thought. His experiment has become one of the more well known and influential social psychology experiments completed.
Marion Anderson once said, “Fear is a disease that eats away at logic and makes man inhuman.” Fear and insecurity fuels the prejudice that is used in man’s inhumanity to others. Even if not for the sake of being inhumane, man criticizes man for lack of compassion; however, it is in nature that men are inhumane to others especially in times of fear and insecurity. As Mark Twain exemplifies in his work, Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, man’s inhumanity to man, is due to the fear, prejudice, insecurity, and selfishness that every man has experienced in society.
Each person feels rivalry or competition to other humans, for the majority of their lifetime. This rivalry greatly affects our ability to understand others, and this eventually results in war, discrimination, and enmity. Children are definitely culprits for acting inhumane to each other with teasing, competition, and often hurtful remarks. Although this is the way children often act, it is in the teenage years realization, along with careful thought and consideration, brings each individual to understand wider prospects of human nature; that people coldly drive ahead for themselves alone. Man’s inhumanity1 to man is a way for people to protect themselves from having pain inflicted on them by fellow humans, and achieving their goals and desires free from interference of others.
The cruel nature and intentions of people can either hurt or harm individuals or it can bring about resilience and determination. In the novel To Kill a Mockingbird, Harper Lee revealed that humans often have other motives in life; some are born to be evil in nature, some are naturally innocent and then there are some that are born to protect the innocent. Lee utilized a variety of symbols and themes that correlated with each other and thus had the ability to create questions in the minds of the readers. Are humans calculatedly cruel or is there some moral good in each of us? The impiety of a few can create a movement, imprison the innocent or reveal the sincerity of others.
In finding that people are not naturally aggressive. Milgram now alters the experiment to find out why do people act the way they do. He compiled the experiment to answer, why do people obey authority, even when the actions are against their own morals.
Human nature is the most debated topic to date. Many people think that mankind is programmed to be evil; on the other hand people argue that it is naturally good. Nathaniel Hawthorne gave his argument with the novel, The Scarlet Letter. The Scarlet Letter showed that mankind is innately good by Chillingworth’s measures, Hester’s capitulates and Dimmesdale’s noble qualities.
The play, Hamlet, by William Shakespeare, shows human nature to be greedy, self-involved and vengeful. Claudius is driven by his greed to commit murder. Polonius is always looking out for himself, currying favor at the expense of anyone in his way. Hamlet thinks only of vengeance from the moment he finds out about Claudius murdering his father. Human nature has been all of these things, but it has also evolved through the ages. We can be base and cruel, but we can also show great compassion and kindness.
In 1961, Stanley Milgram, a Yale University Psychologist conducted a variety of social psychology experiments on obedience to authority figures. His experiments involved three individuals, one of them was a volunteer who played the role of the teacher, one was an actor who played the role of the student, and one was the experimenter who played the role of the authority. The teacher was instructed by the authority to administrate shocks to the student (who claimed to have a heart condition) whenever they answered a question incorrectly. The voltage of the shock would go up after every wrong answer. The experimenter would then instruct the teacher to administrate higher voltages even though pain was being imposed. The teacher would then have to make a choice between his morals and values or the choice of the authority figure. The point of the experiment was to try to comprehend just how far an individual would continue when being ordered by an individual in a trench coat to electrically shock another human being for getting questions incorrect. The experiment consisted of administrating pain to different people and proved that ordinary people will obey people with authority. Some of the various reasons are that the experimenter was wearing a trench coat, fear of the consequences for not cooperating, the experiments were conducted in Yale University a place of prestige, and the authority f...
They split them into categories of leaner and teacher. The teachers had to ask the learner questions and for any question wrong, they would shock them. As the questions went on the voltage became higher, it started at 15 volts and went to 450 volts. However, each subject was always the teacher and the learners were in on it and provided a recording of wrong answers and protest to coordinate with the shock voltage. One learner even spoke about a heart condition he had in front of a subject.