Exploring Disability Rights: PGA Tour, Inc. v. Martin

952 Words2 Pages

PGA Tour, Inc. v. Martin
Facts of the Case:
In the court case of PGA Tour, Inc. v. Martin, Martin was a golfer who suffered from a circulatory disorder that prevents him from walking properly. Circulatory disorders diminish the flow of blood and oxygen supply throughout your body, so it was difficult for Martin to walk the lengths of a golf course. In order to gain entry into professional golf tours, Martin had to qualify at a competition known as “Q-School.” Competing in the stages of Q-School was not an issue for Martin until the last stage when none of the competitors were permitted to use a golf cart. He was refused the use of a golf cart during the third stage, so he filed a complaint under Title III of the American’s with Disabilities Act (PGA Tour, Inc. v. Martin, 2001).
Decisions:
The petitioner of PGA Tour, Inc. believed that the golf tournament was supported by the American’s with Disabilities Act because it was a “private club or establishment” (PGA Tour, Inc. v. Martin, 2001). On the other hand, the …show more content…

Kuketz disagreed and appealed, stating that the judge made a mistake in ruling that his modification would create a “fundamental alteration of the game” (Kuketz v. Petronelli, 2005). In the case of PGA Tour Inc. v. Martin, allowing the use of the golf cart did not skew the substance of the competition, but allowing Kuketz to use two bounces would be inconsistent with the game strategies, thus creating a totally new game. Under the ADA, Kuketz had rights to an individual assessment of the situation due to his disability, but even after that, the racquetball league did not have to individually assess Kuketz due to his modification of the game fundamentally altering the

More about Exploring Disability Rights: PGA Tour, Inc. v. Martin

Open Document