Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: History
Description of Background Biological Background Peter Kürten was believed to have a “different” brain according to Charlie Hintz, a writer who viewed the decapitated head of Kürten at a museum in Wisconsin, United States (2017). In fact, the doctor assigned to observe Kürten before his execution, Dr. Karl Berg, believed Kürten had an altered brain chemistry (Ramsland, 2014). He believed his brain was composed of “’90 [percent] sadism’” and “’10 [percent]’” evil, stemming from the injustices done to him in his early years (Ramsland, 2014). Berg would later go on to write Sadist, a book detailing Kürten and his atrocities which was known as one of the first psychological studies of a serial killer based on sexual deviancy (Origjanska, 2018). …show more content…
After his decapitation, his brain was examined (Townsend, 2017). However, the brain was deemed to be completely normal (Townsend, 2017). I think that this indicates that his traumatic childhood served as the main reason for him to be the way he was. According to Rachel Tompkins, a writer focusing on serial killers, doctors “still struggle” to figure out what made Kürten commit the crimes he did (2017). I found no sources indicating any gender dysphoria, nor did I find any sources indicating any homosexual attraction or intent. Kürten did not discriminate based on sex when it came to his victims, having attacked both men and women. Kürten was a white male, and he was 48 years old when he was executed (Gilligan). Situational Background Kürten was born into a small outskirt of Colonge-Mulheim, Germany on May 26, 1883 (Jenkins, 2007). His family was very poor, with him and his entire family residing in a one-bedroom apartment (Townsend, 2017). It is also important to note that, at this time, Germany was a newly formed nation with a slew of problems (Schleunes et al., 2018). I think the biggest situational impact was his socioeconomic status, however. Being poor, Kürten did not have access to a lot of resources and had no escape from his parents. Moreover, he had to see the violence firsthand that his alcoholic father would inflict. Towards the end of the attacks, the Great Depression settled in across Germany, causing people to look for work (Blanco). Developmental Factors Kürten’s family had a large impact on him when growing up. He was born to an abusive home, where his father would not only hit Kürten and his 12 other siblings, but also his wife (Duncan, 2018). In fact, many sources cite that Kürten received some of the harshest beatings from his father (Duncan, 2018). Moreover, Kürten’s father would often not only beat Kürten’s mother, but also sexually assault her (Duncan, 2018). This happened in front of Kürten and his other siblings often (Tompkins, 2017). This likely caused Kürten to associate sex with violence at a young age. Seeing this violence made Kürten believe that sex and violence went together and were supposed to coexist. Kürten’s father was so twisted that he was accused of attempting to sexually assault one of Kürten’s sisters who was 13 years old at the time (Jenkins, 2007). This led him to receiving some jail time, setting Kürten free from his father (Jenkins, 2007). With Kürten associating intercourse and violence with one another, Kürten was already on a dark path.
By happenstance, Kürten met a dog catcher who lived in the same building who taught him how to catch animals (Duncan, 2018). However, the dog catcher served as a conduit between Kürten and his transition into violent sex. The dog catcher educated Kürten on not only how to catch animals but also torture them (Duncan, 2018). To make matters worse, Kürten would then practice bestiality on the animals, originally starting with dogs (Duncan, 2018). This all occurred before Kürten would have his tenth birthday. With time, Kürten learned how to capture other animals, and he began to practice his sexual misconduct with these animals including goats, sheep, and pigs (Duncan, 2018). As he matured, he began to stab the animals or cut them in some way. He did this so he could see the blood, serving as his signature (Duncan, 2018). Katie Serena, writer for the website allthatsinteresting, cites that Kürten “formed” a partnership with a lady when he was around 13 (Serena). However, she refused to have sex with him, leading him to continue his bestiality practices until he was discovered mutilating a hog (Serena). Description of …show more content…
Crimes First & Second Murders (Unconfirmed; Confessed by Kürten) Kürten, after being captured, told the detectives about his first murders. These occurred when he was only nine years old according to many sources (Duncan, 2018) (Tompkins, 2017). The story, as Kürten tells it, occurred when Kürten went to play on the Rhine River with two boys from school around his age (Duncan, 2018). As the boys were on a raft on the river, Kürten pushed one off into the water (Origjanska, 2018). The other boy who was next to Kürten at the time, dove in to save the boy (Origjanska, 2018). However, Kürten kept both of their heads under water, successfully drowning and killing them (Origjanska, 2018). Fortunately for Kürten, he was cleared of any foul play as it was dismissed as a tragic accident (Duncan, 2018). This murder was never officially confirmed because there was no corroborating evidence. Other Crimes Before Third Murder After a while of staying at home, Kürten eventually ran away when he was 16 (Blanco). He had to live on the streets, doing what he could to get food and shelter, however many of these landed him in and out of prison (Blanco). Over the course of his life, Kürten would be imprisoned almost 30 different times (Jenkins, 2007). With each imprisonment, he grew more twisted and sadistic (Duncan, 2018). He even requested or acted in manners to get him solitary confinement (Duncan, 2018). Third Murder The next murder, one that was confirmed and attributed to Kürten, was that of Christine Klein, a nine-year old girl (Townsend, 2017).
Her murder occurred on May 25th, 1913 (Townsend, 2017). Originally, Kürten went into the home of Klein after believing that the property was vacant (Blanco). The home was situated above a pub that Klein’s parents ran, but Kürten went in through a window to rob the area (Blanco). When Kürten saw the young girl asleep, he strangled her then used the knife he carried in his pocket to slice her throat twice across (Townsend, 2017). After seeing her blood drop to the floor and the sounds that it made, Kürten claimed to have orgasmed (Townsend, 2017). Kürten then left the scene (Blanco). However, Kürten was never suspected for the murder of the girl (Duncan, 2018). Instead, Otto Klein was suspected (Blanco). He was suspected to be the killer because he had gotten into a large fight with the family prior (Blanco). Eventually, the uncle was acquitted thanks to the evidence not being enough (Duncan, 2018). However, Kürten followed the case closely and was sure to gain his sadistic satisfaction of hearing the remarks of locals (Duncan, 2018). Soon after, Kürten began to commit a string of attacks in Düsseldorf by method of strangulation and axe, however these were not well documented (Blanco). World War I & Random
Attack Kürten left the German Army during World War I because of a lack of interest in following orders, leading to his imprisonment until 1921 (Blanco). After his release, Kürten stabbed Maria Kuhn 24 times (Peter Kürten Biography, 2016). However, Kuhn luckily survived this attack in 1929 (Peter Kürten Biography, 2016). Fourth Murder & Fifth Murder His fourth murder occurred on February 9th, 1929 when he attacked and killed an eight-year-old girl, Rosa Ohliger (Peter Kürten Biography, 2016). After stabbing her multiple times and ejaculating at the sight of her blood, Kürten then dumped the body at a hedge where he planned to burn the body (Blanco). Gasoline was poured over her body in an attempt to burn her, and Kürten had mutated her vagina by stabbing it (Wetsch, 2005). After this murder, Scheer, a male mechanic, was murdered by Kürten after being stabbed around twenty times (Wetsch, 2005). As seen with the murder of Klein, Kürten went back to the scene to hear the fruits of his labor (Wetsch, 2005). Scheer was killed only five days after Rosa (Peter Kürten Biography, 2016). This murder was important to note because it was one of the few male assaults that Kürten committed and was documented. Sixth & Seventh Murders On August 23rd, 1929, after a man named Stausberg was imprisoned for the crimes of Kürten, Kürten killed Louise Lenzen who was fourteen years old and Gertrude Hamacher who was five years old (Peter Kürten Biography, 2016). They were foster sisters (Peter Kürten Biography, 2016). The two met Kürten at a fair in Flehe, Germany, where he lured Hamacher away from her sister and cut her throat using a pocketknife (Blanco). When Lenzen arrived back after being sent away from Kürten, she too was killed (Blanco). These crimes illuminated that Strausberg was actually innocent, and that The Vampire of Düsseldorf was still on the loose (Blanco). Assault & Eighth & Ninth Murders The next attack was on Gertrude Schulte, a woman who survived and gave a conflicting description of what Kürten looked like to the police (Peter Kürten Biography, 2016). This assault was important because it was the start of Kürten changing his type of attack. After this attack, Kürten began to bludgeon as opposed to slash or cut. Ida Reuter was the eighth murder victim that was raped and killed by Kürten (Peter Kürten Biography, 2016). Then, Kürten killed Elizabeth Dorrier on October 12, 1929 by “batter[ing] her to death” (Peter Kürten Biography, 2016). Not much was stated about these murders, other than both were workers (Blanco). Tenth Murder The murder of Gertrude Albermann occurred in 1929 as well, on November 7th (Peter Kürten Biography, 2016). She was only five years old (Blanco). Kürten stabbed the girl over 30 times after she was strangled (Blanco). However, to get his fix of attention and notoriety, Kürten contacted the local police department and detailed the location of the girl’s body by sending in a map (Peter Kürten Biography, 2016). Thankfully, this would the final fatal attack of Kürten (Blanco) (Peter Kürten Biography, 2016). Final Attack Maria Budlick was the final victim of Kürten and his ruthless attacks (Peter Kürten Biography, 2016). He attempted to sleep with her, but when she did not comply, he assaulted her and left her (Peter Kürten Biography, 2016). However, the police managed to convince Budlick to go forward with her case after they intercepted a letter she sent to a friend detailing the attack (Blanco). Oddly enough, Kürten, realizing that his reign of evil was coming to a close, convinced his wife, who happened to be a convicted murderer for killing her fiancé, to turn himself in (Blanco). This was done so that way she could receive some form of restitution (Townsend, 2017). The police found and arrested Kürten, who apparently surrendered without resistance (Blanco). Analysis of Murders When analyzing the crimes committed by Kürten, some parallels can be drawn. For example, many of the victims that Kürten killed and attacked were female. However, Kürten’s victims included both sexes (Dain, 2018). Interestingly, most of the murdered victims were younger and under fifteen years old. This might have been because Kürten wanted to kill victims who were not only helpless, but also struggling because he enjoyed the sight of blood. Some of the victims also shared first names. Kürten attacked two Gertrude’s and two Maria’s. However, this could be happenstance as opposed to something planned. After many of the murders Kürten would return to the scene or do something to stir trouble afterwards. He called the newspaper with Albermann and provided details about her location, he followed the case of Klein, and probably did similar things with the other victims. Many of the attacks drew blood in some way, as that was Kürten’s favorite thing. Despite the similarities, there was no one linking factor between all of the victims other than their location in Germany. Aliases
...theorize that serial killers have brain damage or other biological abnormalities that contribute to their actions. Damage to areas like the frontal lobe, the hypothalamus and the limbic system can contribute to extreme aggression, loss of control, loss of judgment and violence. Henry Lee Lucas, who was convicted of 11 murders, was shown to have extreme brain damage in these areas, probably the result of childhood abuse, malnutrition and alcoholism. Arthur Shawcross, another 11-time serial killer, was found to have had several brain injuries, including two skull fractures. While in prison, he suffered from headaches and often blacked out. Bobby Joe Long, convicted of nine murders, stated at one point, "After I'm dead, they're going to open up my head and find that just like we've been saying a part of my brain is black and dry and dead" [source: Scott].
head was picked up by the executioner, and her body was eventually dumped right beside her
David Berkowitz, otherwise known as the “Son of Sam”, was notorious for his crimes committed between 1976 and 1977 that ended the lives of six innocent victims and wounded several others in New York (“David Berkowitz Biography”, n.d.). At first, police did not make a connection between the murders because there was nothing unusual about them; all the victims were shot with a 40 caliber gun, not fairly unusual during this time or place especially since the killings were over an extended period of time. Police finally made the connection when Berkowitz began to live behind notes that were meant to tantalize authorities since they had yet to catch him (“David Berkowitz| Son of Sam Killer,” 2015). Often times, the psychological structure of a human
-Bardsley, M., Bell, R., and Lohr, D. 2009. The BTK Story. Retrieved December 9, 2009 from http://www.trutv.com/library/crime/serial_killers/unsolved/btk/index_1.html : This was a reliable source since it collected it’s information from police records, first hand accounts and testimony from the trial. This resource was very helpful because it presented a high-profile case of a person suffering from this disorder.
Subsequently to that, in the same year the following to Hinman’ murder in which Atkins participated , the assassination of Sharon Tate who was pregnant, Steven Parent, Jay Sebring, Wojciech Frykowski, and Abigail Folger took place. According to the forensic evidence the crime was describe as brutal (Wikipedia). During Atkins declaration she confesses to be the killer of Tate during her statement. “She stated that she had stabbed Tate because she was ‘sick of listening to her, pleading and begging, begging and pleading’” (Wikipedia). During trail the audience saw a lack of remorse about the crime committed by her and the Mason Family. During one her declaration she confesses t...
Introduction: On the spectrum of criminal activity, serial killers are rather rare. Rarer still is a serial killer like Ted Bundy. Bundy confessed to killing 28 women in the 1970s in ghastly fashion and some believe he may have killed far more. It is hard to imagine what could cause any person to cross the mental boundary into such macabre behavior as Bundy perpetrated. Nevertheless, it is important to try to understand that behavior because only though such an understanding would society be able to identify and deter mass murderers in order to save lives.
Serial killers have long eluded law enforcement while simultaneously grabbing the attention of the public, and now more than ever, criminal psychologists are beginning to understand what makes a serial killer. In his true-crime documentary, In Cold Blood, Truman Capote depicts the horrifying murders of four members of the Clutter family and the search to find the criminals responsible for the deaths. Eventually, two killers are caught, one being Perry Smith, a detached and emotionless man. And although his carnage of the Clutters labeled him a mass murderer, many of Perry’s personality traits are characteristic of a serial killer. In fact, if detectives had not caught him, Perry could have easily become a serial killer.
Serial killers are defined to “be driven by instinct and desire to kill.” In a study done in 2000, Dr, Richard Davidson says, “people with a large amount of aggression – in particular people who have committed aggressive murders or have a social disorder – have almost no brain activity in the orbital frontal cortex or the anterior cingulated cortex while activity in the amyglade continued perfectly. The orbital frontal cortex and the anterior congulated cortex control emotional impulses while the amyglade controls reactions to fear.” Davidson concludes his research claiming that although environment can and will affect a serial killer’s thoughts, it is a killer’s genetic makeup that inevitably creates murderous thoughts.
Serial killers have captivated the attention of scientists from the first signs of their existence to modern day. Interested by these killers’ inhumane actions, researchers set out to determine the cause of such graphic, horrific crimes. The brain has been brought into question regarding the motivation of these cold blooded killers. After extensive research, abnormalities of both the chemical composition and material makeup have been identified within the brains of numerous serial killers. These differences are more than mere coincidence, they are evidence that killers do not think in the same way. The killers’ drives and motives are irregular, just as their brains are. Not only are these variations interesting, but they are also crucial to the justice system in regards to the punishment of past, future, and present sequential murderers. It is important that as a society we learn the differences in the mind of a killer, and also recognize and understand them. A serial killer’s brain greatly differs in function from the average citizen’s brain due to physical variations in the brain and a different chemical makeup.
Miller, Laurence. "The predator's brain: Neuropsychodynamics of serial killers."Serial offenders: Current thought, recent findings, unusual syndromes (2000): 135-166.
Brogaard, Berit. "The Making of a Serial Killer." Psychology Today. Berit Brogaard, D.M.Sci., Ph.D in The Superhuman Mind, 07 Dec. 2012. Web. 08 Apr. 2014.
He was charged with six counts of murder and two charges of attempted murder. He pleaded not guilty to all charges.The prosecution relied on the interview notes that were from his arrest. It took over four hours to read the notes to the jury. While the interview notes were being read, so were the testimonies of 3 victims. Nilsen's defense introduced evidence of their sexual encounters with Nilsen, which harmed his case to set him free. Physical evidence included photographs of the murder scenes, the chopping board that was used to dissect the victims, and the cooking pot used to boil the skulls, feet and
He waited until Sarah fell asleep, then he silently snuck into the kitchen to grab a knife and a garbage bag. He carefully laid the garbage bag on the other side of Sarah and pushed her onto it. Then with great strength, once, twice, three times he stabbed her in the chest. He quickly wrapped up her body and snuck over to his neighbor, Jared’s, house and hid her body and the knife he used to kill her in the trash
Since then, there have been many investigations that included numerous suspects; despite modern technology, there has never been conclusive evidence that proves only one person committed the murders. This means that there could have been multiple people who used
Flynn, Clifton P. "Acknowledging the "Zoological Connection": A Sociological Analysis of Animal Cruelty." Society and Animals 9.1 (2001): 71-87. Print.