Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Characteristics of a villain in literature
Examples of the impact of the perverse in poe stories
Examples of the impact of the perverse in poe stories
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Characteristics of a villain in literature
The beginning of the process of perversion starts with an idea. It’s that first moment when a person starts to think doing something you consider as bad or something that goes against society’s views of right and wrong. In the Imp of the Perverse, that moment is when he (the character) considers confessing the murder out loud in public. However, in The Cask of Amontillado, Montresor contemplates on whether to enact revenge on Fortunato. One day, whilst sauntering along the streets, I arrested myself in the act of murmuring, half aloud, these customary syllables. In a fit of petulance, I remodelled them thus; "I am safe -- I am safe -- yes -- if I be not fool enough to make open confession!" The quote says that while he was walking in the …show more content…
streets, he catches himself saying things out. So, instead of fighting his urge, he resorts to repeating the phrase, “I am safe”. He understands that with a slip of the tongue could land him in jail. In the When he was walking in public, he got the thought that he should just say it out loud.
But, he stops himself and decides to repeat, “I am safe”, as an alternative option that possibly send him straight to prison. The idea started off small, but it ended up growing into something much more unstable. He has to remind himself that confessing is not a good thing. I must not only punish but punish with impunity. A wrong is unredressed when retribution overtakes its redresser. It is equally unredressed when the avenger fails to make himself felt as such to him who has done the wrong. In this quote, Montresor says that must be able to Fortunato in a way that he will not be caught. He goes on to say that Fortunato has done him an injustice and has not apologized for offending him. So now, Montresor feels that revenge would be incomplete if it was carried out without victim knowing that it was him who killed him. Montresor had had enough and was going to finally get revenge on Fortunato. The problem with planning out his revenge was that he had to make sure that he did so without getting caught. It is clear that Montresor has rolling around this idea within his head for quite some time. The fact he says that he must punish him with worrying about being caught shows that he knows it is immoral to kill another man. Alas, as stated before whatever offense dealt was the straw that broke the camel’s
back.
Montresor must trick and manipulate Fortunato to accomplish his goal of revenge. He tells Fortunato the reason he is at the ...
It is constantly seen that people take revenge on each other in the real world so it comes to no surprise that Montresor is taking revenge on Fortunato. Specifically in this story Montresor will feel better if he “not only punish but punish with impunity” (108 Poe). But further on what I found to even more realistic was that this wasn’t normal revenge, this was pure mastermind torture. Montresor knew that Fortunato was sick with Montresor saying “…but the severe cold with which I perceive you are afflicted”(109 Poe) regarding that he didn’t want Fortunato to come down to his vaults, but Montresor true intentions were wanting Fortunato to fight Montresor request of not coming, and it worked. Montresor also knew how well Fortunato was at differencing wine “I was silly enough to pay the full Amontillado price without consulting you in the matter” (109 Poe). By Montresor exploiting Fortunato’s sickness and skill of wines, Montresor knew that he could get Fortunato in the vaults where he could execute his revenge. At a first glance this may not seem lifelike because there’s an assumption to be made that people aren’t this immoral. But the truth is that the revenge that Montresor conducted is seen constantly in our culture. It’s undeniably real of the monstrosity that was made by Montresor when comparing it to the wicked
Montresor, fifty years after it happened, is confessing to the murder of his foe, Fortunato. He justifies his actions by saying that Fortunato caused him a thous...
When they arrive at the Montresor estate, Montresor leads Fortunato down the stairs into the catacombs. Down here is where the Amontillado Fortunato is going to taste and where the revenge of Montresor is going to take place. As he get closer and closer, the narrator opens up more and more to how he is going to kill his "friend". It sound like it is a premeditated murder. Montresor seems so inconspicuous that he acts like he cares about Fortunato which is still a part of his plan.
The quote displays verbal irony because Montresor knows that Fortunato is not going to live a long life because he is planning on killing him. Montresor wants to get revenge on Fortunato because of the grudge he has against him. He is planning to chain him to a wall and leave him there to die with no idea why his “friend” is doing this.
In “The Cask of Amontillado” first Montresor models the characteristic of a sane murderer by portraying a motive. The definition of motive is “the goal or object of a person’s actions” (“motive”). Motive in a murder is the objective of finding a reason to kill someone; Montresor has a motive. In the first sentence Montresor says “...but when he ventured upon insult, I vowed revenge” (Poe 426). This is the first indication that he had motive to kill. He believed that he had been insulted and now he sought revenge. Another indication a motive was in place is the Montresor family
“The thousand injuries of Fortunato I had Borne as I best could, but when he ventured upon insult, I vowed revenge.” (Poe, 1108) Right away Montresor states this and as a reader, we start to feel sympathy for Montresor, he is the first character we are introduced to and because of this we naturally take his side. Of course at this point we don’t know what “revenge” really means, but by the end when we find out what his “revenge” entails our opinion of him most likely changes. His “revenge” of course is murdering Fortunato. He could no longer put up with the injuries he had borne and wanted to put an end to his own humiliation from being “insulted” by Fortunato. . Before he proceeds with the killing of his once friend Montresor thinks to himself, “It must be understood that neither by word nor deed had I given Fortunato cause to doubt my good will. I continued, as was my won 't, to smile in his face, and he did not perceive that my smile now was at the thought of his immolation” (Poe, 1108). This text is so haunting and terrible how one could smile at the thought of a person’s immolation. We can also see in this text that the murder of his friend has been pre-determined and well thought out. This almost makes what he does worse because he knows how horrible of a murder he is going to commit. Although we
Because Montresor narrates the story in the first person, the reader is able to perceive his thoughts and understand his motivations and justifications for his ruthless murder in a manner which a third person point of view would not allow. Montresor’s personal narration of the events of the story does not justify his crime in the audience’s eyes, but it does offer a unique opportunity for the audience to view a murder from the perspective of a madman killer. It is Poe’s usage of this unique angle that causes the story to be so captivating and gruesomely fascinating. As the story opens, Montresor explains why it is necessary that he “not only punish but punish with impunity” to avenge for Fortunado’s insult to him. This justification for his crime is a piece of information that the audience is able to learn only because they are permitted inside the mind of the protagonist. In the final scene, when Montresor is carrying out his murder pl...
The first indirect factor that could contribute to Montresor’s vengeful act, and thus the story’s theme of revenge, is the character of Montresor. Montresor tends to harbor feelings of resentment and has a hard time not taking things out of context (Womack). He also plans the murder of Fortunato in advance and devises it in such a way that he will not be caught. In killing Fortunato, Montreso...
Montresor knows from the beginning that he is going to take revenge on Fortunato by murdering him. The sentence, “You, who so well know the nature of my soul, will not suppose, however that I gave utterance to threat.” lets us know that Montresor was plotting Fortunato’s murder from
While Montresor figures out his plan to seek revenge, he says “A wrong is undressed when retribution overtakes its redresser” (1). The meaning of redresser is an error, fault, or evil. This means Montresor wants to get revenge for what he thinks Fortunato has done to him. Montresor thinks if he is going to get revenge he has to pull it off. So, Montresor made sure Fortunato was drunk on the last day before fasting and made sure no one was in the house with his mysterious plan. From this point of the story, Montresor is soon going to kill Fortunato, but Montresor never tells
In his article, “The Cask of Amontillado: A Case for the Defense.” Patrick White made his claim that Montresor does not understand his actions to be demented or Satanic. This is because of his family’s motto “No one attacks me with impunity”, is so “rooted in Montresor’s mind…” (White, 551). The claim also goes on to say that Montresor has no remorse because of how much he honored the motto.
This immediate familiarity helps the reader to see inside the calculating mind of Montresor, whom we later learn is a killer. When talking about the past insults of Fortunato, he takes on a cold, determined tone: “At length I would be avenged; this was a point definitively settled […] I must not only punish, but punish with impunity. A wrong is unredressed when retribution overtakes its redresser. It is equally unredressed when the avenger fails to make himself felt as such to him who has done the wrong” (Poe, 618).
In the story which Montresor is involved, he tells his close friend of the downfall and murder of Fortunato, who has supposedly caused the falling in status of his family name. This drives our main character to decide to murder him under the means of revenge. Though this leads us into our conflict, “Who’s more evil?”, there had been some issues with the murder of Fortunato. A large example is the lack of reason for his murder, as stated in the beginning of the story, "A wrong is unredressed when retribution overtakes its redresser. It is equally unredressed when the avenger fails to make himself felt as such to him who has done the wrong", though this ends up not being followed through, as Fortunato is completely clueless to his “friends” motive, as Montresor only mocks Fortunato's cries for help, not even dispelling his possible motives. Not the mention the way that Fortunato fell into death, as he was locked in a damp cell in the dark where he was restricted, this could lead to things such as starvation and dying from thirst, or his wrists could start to rot from lack of blood flow and the shackles constantly rubbing against his
The story begins with Montresor’s monologue, explaining why he wants to take revenge on Fortunado, actually a friend of him. “The thousand injuries of Fortunato I had borne as I best could, but when he ventured upon insult, I vowed revenge”. Although the writer doesn’t give the detail explanation of what, on earth, Fortunato did by the “thousand injuries”, we can still feel the anger of Montresor, burning in his mind. He wants to revenge, using his own way. “It must be understood that neither by word nor deed had I given Fortunato cause to doubt my good will. I continued as was my wont, to smile in his face, and he did not perceive that my smile NOW was at the thought of his immolation.” He knew Fortunato’s characteristics well, including the weak point. That is how he did the whole revenge.