Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Why standardized testing isnt fair
How standardized testing is unfair
Why standardized testing isnt fair
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Why standardized testing isnt fair
Introduction:
1. Like all of us did, “many high school students spend the spring semester of their junior year preparing to take the ACT or SAT.” (Streetman)
2. “Colleges often use one of these two tests to determine whether to admit the student or to determine how much scholarship money they will award the student.” (Streetman)
3. Today, I’m going to discuss why the ACT and SAT exams should no longer be used to evaluate a student’s readiness for college and why they should be abolished from all their purposes.
4. I will go into detail as to why the SAT and ACT exams are unfair and hopefully by the end of my speech, you guys will understand how useless the glorified exams really are.
Body Paragraphs:
1. Claim: So what exactly are the ACT’s
…show more content…
Evidence: The ACT tests, or the American College Test, is defined as “a standardized test to determine a high school graduate’s preparation for college-level work.” (foreignborn.com)
Transition: Although the exams differ from each other, and they both seem to be well throughout measures of performance, in reality they don’t represent the student’s capabilities in an effective matter.
*first visual supplement*(Goldfarb)
2. Claim: “Students who have parents with a higher income tend to perform better on the SAT and ACT exams.” (Goldfarb)
2.1. Evidence: As you can see in the chart behind me, students who have a household income more than $200,000 a year scored an average combined score of 1714. (Goldfarb)
2.2. Evidence: On the other hand, students who have a household income under $20,000 a year average a combined score of 1326. (Goldfarb)
2.2.1. Warrant: The score clearly increases as the income increase on the chart.
2.3. Evidence: “The writing section of the exam had such a large gap in score between income’s that the College Board officials have decided to drop it.” (Goldfarb)
2.3.1. Warrant: Is it really fair to judge a student’s academic ability based off their parent’s
…show more content…
*second visual supplement*(Streetman)
4. Claim: “The questions asked on the exams aren’t exactly fair questions to ask on a standardized test and are more opinion based.”(Streetman)
4.1. Evidence: Read the question behind me and decide for yourself if it’s a fair question to ask on a standardized test.
4.1.1. Warrant: As you can see, all the answers to the question are opinion based.
4.2. Evidence: During my research, I found one teacher who said “I teach writing and journalism, yet I found some questions were written so awkwardly — although they were grammatically correct — that I wanted to take a red pen to them and demand that they be rewritten” (Streetman)
4.2.1. Warrant: This test asks such a variety of questions, that general opinion based questions like the one behind me make the test unreliable.
4.2.2. Warrant: One question, like the one seen above, can make or break someone’s score and even push some students out of the acceptance range.
Transition: So these unfair questions not only affect the individual student, but are used for high school evaluations as
more than $20,000 in 2007 compared to the average high school graduates. (p. 260) Instead these
In the article, Gregory Mantsio reveals a chart based on the test results of 1,465,744 SAT takers in the year of 2006. The chart given, displays the amount of the family income and how it affects the scores of those who had taken the SAT. The facts given, indicates that the more money the family has, income that the family receives, the higher the scores are. For example, if you had a job or career that allowed you to be able to bring in more than $100,000, then your child is more likely to receive a median score of approximately 1,100. But the question is, how can this be so? One reason is quite simple: The children born into a higher class has much more access to educational resources, are exposed to vocabulary and spoken language in their early childhood, and experience less stress than those who are in a lower class. Which in the long run, gives the children in the higher class a better chance when it comes to succeeding in life. Compared to those in a lower class whose scores are below the approximated amount of 1,100 due to their family
Since this test has been devised, the number one question everybody is asking is, “ isn’t it unfair to base a student’s entire future on one test, when he or she simply could have had a bad day when taking the test”? The president Kirk T. Schroder of the Virginia Board of Education, answer this question by saying, “First of all, these tests are untimed, so no student is under arbitrary time pressure in taking the test.
Any diverse group of organisms will not respond identically to a standard test; some will respond positively, and some will respond negatively. The student population of the United States is an extremely varied group, and students will respond differently to the same "standard" test. The format of the current standardized test, all multiple-choice questions, does not allow for variables among the test takers. In fact, the test attempts to erase all the variables and create a uniform ...
An article from the Ojibwe News, a Native American Magazine, gives a startling statistic discovered by research analysts for the Minnesota Private College Research Foundation. They found that a child from a family earning $25,000 or less annually is only one-half as likely to enroll in college as a child from a family with an annual income of $50,000 or more.
Some students simply do not test well, others try their hardest and still cannot reach the impracticable standards set for them. The individuals who create these tests do not understand the pressures of being a student, or the struggle to answer thirty-five questions in a compressed time period. One test cannot accurately measure the intelligence of a student.
As she goes on, she also questions the effectiveness and validity of the standardized tests. She accomplishes this through the use of rhetorical questions like “can you really infer whether or not students deserve to move forward in their education because of what your test states?” and that if it is evident that the district policy is not accurate enough to make decisions on whether student should move forward with their education then “why is there a strict policy that forces the school
Standardized testing assesses students, teachers, and the school itself, which puts a great deal of pressure on the students. High scores show that the school is effective in teaching students, while low test scores make teachers and schools look as though they are not teaching the students properly. This is not always the case. There are teachers who do teach students what they need to know to pass the test, but their students are still unprepared. Although teachers try to improve instruction, student performance is still variable to other factors that the school cannot control.
These flawed tests are not truly able of measuring students how well students will perform in college as they are supposedly used to predict. A single test that students have to wake up for at six, seven in the morning on a Saturday and travel to some random location to take a difficult test should not impact the student's chance of getting into college, let alone predict how well they will
Standardized testing has been proven to be biased towards those of ethnic and socioeconomic disadvantaged groups. Wealthy students become more prepared for standardized tests through better life experiences, such as top-quality schools and test prep tutors. Steven Syverson implies that students with high SAT scores are presumed to be “bright” and encouraged to consider the most selective colleges, with no regard to their academic performance in high school (57). Those students that were considered elite, but did not perform well their parents suggested to admission counselors that they were “not challenged” in high school (Syverson 57). According to Marchant and Paulson, race, parent education, and family income were found to account as much as 94% of the variance in scores among states (85:62). Students that belong to multiple disadvantage categories suffered greatly in the scoring criteria. The majority of students with socioeconomic disadvantages are discouraged from attending college. However, those that choose to further their education are more than likely the first ones in their family to attend college. Due to the large debate involving the admissions process using the SAT score, more colleges have adopted the SAT Optional policy because it is “consistent with their institutional mission and
Standardized testing is an unfair and inaccurate form of judging a person’s intellect. In many cases, people are either over- or underrepresented by their test scores, partly because America does not currently have the capabilities of fairly scoring the increasing number of tests. Additionally, many students today are not native English speakers, and their capabilities could be grossly underestimated by these types of exams. Although President Bush is a supporter, many influential people are against this bill, including the largest teacher’s union in the United States, which has formed a commission in opposition to the President’s proposal.
The rallying call to end high school exit exams is not only a display of America’s failing attitude to education, but also a way to ensure American students are doomed in higher education levels. National exit exams would not harm the overall education standards, but rather would give a reason for students and teachers alike to crack down and get to work. So instead of making excuses it is about time for the American education system to set a standard for students to reach for, not one that is just walked over like the one that has so sadly failed this new generation.
Writer Amanda Mote argues in her essay “Taking the ACT” that the ACT is not fulfilling its purpose as a knowledge standards test. She claims that the ACT is a taxing test that does not test students sufficiently over the knowledge they have built over their high school career. However, this evaluation of the ACT is inaccurate because it does not correctly assess the true purpose and approach of the ACT test. The ACT was created to assess a student’s “college readiness”. This test is not meant to determine the knowledgeability of a student. It is meant to test their ability to comprehend and solve a problem efficiently. The ACT is a taxing test for students, but it’s still manageable; several students even decide to retake the test multiple
In the early 1930s, James B. Conant, president of Harvard University, decided to develop a test for admissions, that was reliable way to measure student achievement without taking into consideration who the test taker was or what background they came from. According to Kevin Finneran, editor of Issues in Science & Technology, Conant believed that through administering the same test to all applicants for admission, factors such as family wealth, which private or elite academy the student may have attended, and any benefits their attendance would bring to the university would be removed from the decision making process. While his colleagues believe this would provide a real excuse for excluding those they did not particularly want entering Harvard, they were soon proved wrong as an increasing number of underprivileged students began scoring very high on tests and ultimately earning acceptance into the university.... ... middle of paper ... ...
...tudents in high-poverty schools. Indeed, low-income students given a chance to attend more-affluent schools performed more than half a year better, on average, than middle income students who attend high-poverty schools” (Kahlenberg, Middle Class Schools for All 2). From this data, it is clear to see that the type of school is what matters most, not income. Ones social income class should not be used to determine their intelligence, but to only advertise their yearly salary.