Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Why zoos are good
Should animals be kept in captivity arguments
Reasons why animals shouldn't be in captivity
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Why zoos are good
Should we have zoos?
One day, your family decides to go to the zoo. When you arrive, your parents say, “Wow! We are going to learn about so many animals.” You think to yourself, “I want to see the seals balance a ball on their nose!” When you are walking in, you see the amazing gift shop with an abundance of stuffed whales, the food court with the amazing smell of burgers and pizza, and the giant directory showing you where to find every single little exhibit of each little animal. Then you think, “This is what nature feels like!” You and your family walk past the monkeys swinging on trees in perfect synchronization to the latest hit by the number one pop star of the year. Then you see the seals flopping on a platform and doing ball tricks
…show more content…
In zoos, the zookeepers are required to give the animals food every day. They show up at the exhibits with a bucket of food, ready to hand it to the animals without a fight. By doing this, animals no longer have their hunting skills. While some zoos will tie the food to the back of a bike and drag it around for the animals to chase, that is not doing much but making the animals walk a little faster(Honestly, most of the animals would catch the food in a few strides anyway). The animals don’t need find their food, strategize a way to kill the animal, or actually catch the prey at all for that matter. Animals also lose their other survival skills, like escaping from predators, or adapting to harsh environments. Since the animals are kept in their own, isolated habitats, they don’t need to worry about predators. They lose their skills on how to survive, which is a major survival technique. Also, the animals do not need to worry about global warming or natural disasters. Most zoos keep their animals in closed off habitats, separated from the outside world. Since most of these habitats are inside, the animals can’t adapt to their environment when it changes, mainly because it doesn’t change. According to the article, “Two Views of the Zoo,” Animal rights people say that animals have the right to live naturally. They say that the animals are getting bored, which is not necessarily a benefit to the …show more content…
Studies have shown that almost all animals in captivity are likely to develop zoochosis, a term used to describe the stereotypical behavior of animals in captivity. Zoo animals that were actually taken from the wild are even more likely to be in this behavioral state, in which they feel they have no goal or function anymore. One symptom of zoochosis is trichotillomania, where the animals feel the need to pluck out their own hair. This is definitely harmful to the animals, and it is only going to cause more problems later on. Not only do the animals pluck their hair, but they also develop a continuous practice of regurgitation and reingestion. This is where they vomit, then immediately eat the vomit after. Clearly, this is an especially unhealthy lifestyle. Additionally, studies suggest that the animals are unhappy in captivity, as nearly all of them are. When the animals feel unhappy, they grow more miserable by the day and they don’t want to do anything with their lives. This explains why the majority of captive animals live shorter lives than animals in the wild. This results in the poor habit of sitting around. This is damaging to their muscles and for their attitude. These poor habits are the eventual causes for the animals’ shorter life spans. As you can see, animals in zoos can develop extremely harmful
Animals life spans in Zoos are also drastically different from those in the wild. Studies have shown that animals kept in Zoos live only half of the lifespan animals do in the wild (Cokal 493). This goes to show that when animals are kept in Zoos they do not live statistically longer or healthier lives. They live shorter, problematic lives due to poor
Zoo captivity is substandard and inadequate for animals. Zoo animals are deprived of their right as animals they are treated unjustly and unfairly. Animals should not be forced to kept in a cage away from their natural environment and be used as a form of entertainment to humans. The animals also suffer from stress and are driven insane by being trapped behind bars. The zoo is supposed to provide safety to these endangered animals but instead, these zoo animals are put at risk towards a variety of dangers such as vulnerability to diseases and starvation.
Animals, particularly the larger ones, are unable to live comfortably in small enclosures. Zoos tend to forget that larger animals have the hardest times getting used to the spaces that they are forced to live in. According to James Nolan’s article, “All the Reasons Why Zoos Should Be Banned”, “…the average lion or tiger has 18,000 times less [space] in captivity than it does in the wild; polar bears a million times less [space]” (7). Although zoos try to recreate their natural habitats, they cannot possibly succeed. The animals, if not born at the zoo, lived in large areas and had all of the freedom that they
Even some animals die at an early age from being taken away from their parents. If the zoo lets the animals back to their habitat they wouldn't be able to survive from being at the zoo for so long because they don’t have natural instincts to survive.
As a kid, I had always looked forward to days at the zoo. I was, however, far more interested in the jungle-themed surroundings than the educational parts. I was told that zoos protected animals and took good care of them. Now I'm not too sure that's the truth. Animals like tigers, lions, and elephants are born to live and grow up in the wild. They aren't meant to live inside of a cage in a zoo. Not only that, but the animals' health isn't as good as you'd expect. Although lots time and money has been spent on zoos, animals are still suffering. Zoos are fun and exciting for kids and tourists, however, the animals aren't enjoying it as much as us.
At the San Francisco zoo in California, a young girl was killed by a tiger who had escaped his low-quality enclosure; the tiger was shot dead on the spot. If wild animals were kept in the wild, deaths and injuries of people from zoo animals would never happen. Animals are taken out of their natural habitats to live unhappy lives in zoos. As a result of having animals in captivity, animals suffer from health problems, insufficient living spaces and conservation problems. Having animals in zoos can be extremely hurtful to the animal’s wellbeing.
One of the many disadvantages animals have is being locked in cages of zoos, is to enjoy the quality of freedom and independence. The animals can’t enjoy the satisfaction of catching their own prey, or the relief of living in their own natural habitat. Plus, the size of the zoo provides for the animals is too small, so the animals don’t get the proper exercise like they would in the wild. Studies have shown tigers and lions have around 18,000 times less space in zoos then they would in their natural habitat. In fact , Woburn Safari Parks was keeping its lion...
The history of zoos has not always been the best. They have not always been used for conservation and protection, but most facilities today protect their animals and do what is best for them. Some say that zoos and sanctuaries are bad for the animals and that they are cramped, mistreated, and not well taken care of. Without them, though, these animals will go extinct, and people will not know how to deal with wild animals. Zoos have many benefits, not just for the animals themselves, but also the humans who enjoy them.
Even though some zoos have an endangered species exhibit with the intention of protecting and rehabilitating animals, many do not do an adequate job of protecting the animals. Zoos have been harmful to the very animals they have sworn to protect. Animals in captivity often suffer from anxiety, boredom and other severe issue related to prolonged confinement. Most animals are unable to thrive in small enclosure with unnatural weather and climates. For example elephants are known to walk as far as 30 miles per day, but the association of Zoos and aquariums only require a space the measures $0 feet by 45 feet, which is about the size of a three car garage, to house these large animals. (peta.org) the drastic difference in the amount of space their allowed ...
Humans are present in both the wild and the zoo. In the zoo animals are constantly watched for entertainment. In the wild animals are hunted and killed for game or for their body parts. There is no way animals can escape the dominating presence of humans. Humans can take away the animals home from the animals if they choose to. They can also take the animals away from their home. Animals can be taken away from their home for reasons as little as for entertainment or for larger reasons such as helping restore them back to health. Helping the animals recover is great; however, sometimes they cannot fully recover and they are sent to zoos. In zoos, the animals will live in small enclosures that are nothing compared to the lifestyle they were living in the
The well being of animals are not well cared for in zoos. Some may argue that zoos attempt to accommodate the animals to the most natural environment possible. Despite some improvements many animals in traditional zoos still encounter health issues and stereotypical behaviours due to the small enclosures (See figure 1). The lack of room zoos encounter is insufficient and keeping animals isolated in a not so large area is detrimental to the health of the animals. “Studies have found that lions in zoos spend 48% of their time pacing and 40% of elephants performed stereotypic behaviours” (Sad eyes & empty lives). These anim...
The practice of zoos has negative effects on zoo animals and should be outlawed because zoo animals shouldn’t be caged up and treated better. Zoos are a horrible place for animals because they suffer in there. “A government-funded study of elephants in UK zoos found that 54% of the elephants showed stereotypes
Zoos are an unsuitable environment for wild animals and should, therefore, be abolished. Firstly, zoo animals are kept in a very confined area compared to their vast natural habitat. Secondly, breeding programmes are far less successful than zoos claim. Thirdly, zoo animals are exposed to many diseases and other dangers. Zoo animals are usually kept in very cramped enclosures and do not behave like their wild counterparts.
Although the zoo isn’t the solution for a few animals, zoos help thousands of animals reproduce and live a healthy life. Zoos should continue to rescue animals and bring them to the zoo. It helps animals reproduce, live a healthy life, and not worry about endangerment. Bringing animals to zoos help that species produce and never die off. In the wilderness, animals are being pushed away from one another because of danger like predators and humans.
First of all, when animals are in controlled environments they lose their natural instincts. In captivity animals are safe from predators, they receive medical attention, and are fed on a regular schedule. This makes them not used to the threats of the wild and they lose their natural instincts. It is understandable that animals may not need natural instincts in zoos or sanctuaries but if the goal is to release the animals back into the wild they could die off again because they have to hunt for themselves and protect themselves again. This means that animals shouldn’t be kept in safe habitats and that “protecting” these animals is actually crippling them.