Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Impact standardized tests have on education
The importance of standardized testing
The importance of standardized testing
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Impact standardized tests have on education
I feel that we should have tested, and these are my reasons why. One is that you need to know where you stand on that subject. If you don’t know how are you going in it how are you going to learn it better? Two the United State testing scores are really low. Three kid stress way too much so they can get a good grade.
Why we should have tested. Reason one. When a new school year start you take a test to see where you're at. Where you need to grow in or don’t. Whether you need to grow in it teachers will test you on it, so they can see if you need to stay on that topic for a while. Once at the beginning of the, and at the end of the year. I think it’s really imported to know how much you grew or if you didn’t grow at all on that subject.
Reason
two. The United State testing score is very low. For the PSAT score are below average, and if teachers teach what will on the PSAT then the scores will score will slowly go up. The average score for the PSAT is between 320 and 1520. The United States is under that. That why we need testing. My last reason, reason three. When it comes to testing kid stress because they want to do excellent, but not because they didn’t have enough time to study. Science proved that kid don’t get stress because they don’t have enough time. It’s because a kid wants to have good grades. A doctor has said before a test kid should relax which will lower their stress. Later when they get the test back they see that they did better on the test. Then they thought they would. Those are my there reason why we should have testing. Reason one we need to know the what we need to understand better. Two United States psat score is really low. Reason three kid stress way too much before test way too much, and theirs no reason to not have to test.
Christopher McCandless’ long, fascinating, but an ultimately fatal journey into the wilderness of Alaska is depicted in the biography, Into the Wild, written by Jon Krakauer. Late in the of summer of 1990, a very young Christopher McCandless left his ordinary world in Annandale, Virginia to pursue a solitary life in the untamed wilds of Alaska. Many will insinuate that Christopher McCandless’ actions were childish and idiotic, but a stronger argument would be that his unconventional thinking and desire to live life on his own terms allowed him to reach self-actualization.
Despite the view that there is too much standardized testing, a majority of respondents said parents should not excuse their children from tests. A majority also said they think test scores are "somewhat important" in judging the effectiveness of their local schools.
One time I heard a teacher at my old high school tell a new teacher that their job is to teach to the test and nothing else. I did not really know what she meant, but I knew something about what she said sounded very wrong. I thought why are they just teaching us how to pass the test instead of just teaching us what we need to know? Later I found out that whether or not I graduate depends on passing the test. The idea of standardized testing to say whether or not students graduate is a bad one. Not just bad for schools, principals, and teachers, but it can mean the end of a student’s future before it begins. That means not only does schools suffer, but everyone in our communities, states, and country suffers. It used to be that students had to take standardized tests every year. The results of these tests said what school districts would get more money or less money for the next school year. And it would also tell schools and teachers if some students needed to be put into higher level programs such as gifted and talented or advanced placement courses or if they were having problems and should be put in special education.
Is it true that the use of utterances and linguistic functions in verbal communication, wherein the comprehensive communicative act, comprise more rhetorical power than the written word? Why people generally prefer face-to-face interaction to discuss significant issues rather than using electronic media at our fingertips? “Why do people meet in debating chambers to make rules and reach political positions when they could surely more easily handle the complexity of the issues and the large amount of relevant data by exchanging documents and be done with it?” (Furniss, 2004, P. 1) This article will help you in deciding if the spoken word has more rhetorical power
Thousands of students around the country and around the world will be preparing for the SAT and ACT tests while trying to maintain a high GPA. These tests will potentially have a significant impact on students lives. Some will be taking these tests for the second or even third time to get that 1500 out of 1600 or that 33 out of 36, that they long desire.
Standardized tests should not be used to measure student proficiency. These tests are becoming much more challenging and high stakes, resulting in a significant amount of stress and anxiety in students. Standardized testing has become a huge weight on students which is leading to test anxiety. Jasmine Evans writes in her article “Problems With Standardized Testing,” from Education.com about critics of the No Child Left Behind, an act passed in 2001 one under the administration of George W. Bush, who say that there is a lot of pressure on teachers, students, and parents, and school officials as a result of these tests. They say the pressure to...
Many people agree that standardized tests are a reasonable evaluation of a student’s capability. Standardized tests originated in the mid-1800s, in the American education system. W. James Popham defines standardized testing by “any test that’s administered, scored, and interpreted in a standard, predetermined manner” (“Is the Use of…,” 2013). After the No Child Left behind Act (NCLB) came about in the early 2000s, the use of standardized testing became popular. NCLB required yearly testing for specific grades and subjects. If schools did not demonstrate adequate improvement, they were either closed or run by the state. This was done so the state and the tax payers of the schools knew that students were learning and knowing the material. Tax payers especially wanted to make sure their money was going to good use (“Is the Use of…,” 2013). High scores on standardized tests can result in funding for the school, along with bonuses to the facility and staff of the school.
Whatever the reason may be, many people, including Price, Kahl, and Ayers do not support standardized testing. These authors all have one opinion in common; they are all against testing for the sake of the children, because of the pressures kids already endure without the pressures of testing. They all claim that tests may be an unfair way to rank children in the world today due to: teachers not teaching children the right material in preparation for the test, family upbringing, and even worrying the children would affect the test results. As Ayers indicates, one single test could not determine where a child stands in the business world, due to the fact that the test analyzes specific topics on school and nothing about their personality or more personal traits.
Have you ever wondered how some athletes have gotten so good at a certain sport? Have you ever thought about what they did in order for them to get this good? For some the answer is simple; workout and train. But for others the answer is different; the use of performance enhancing drugs such as steroids. There are some people that argue that steroids should be legalized and allowed in professional sports. Other people argue that steroids should not be allowed. Today I am going to state my opinion and justify my reason. Steroids should not be allowed in professional sports because it can be very dangerous to the athlete’s health, it is a way to gain and un-fair advantage and it can be dangerous in both social and physical aspects.
Standardized testing is not an effective way to test the skills and abilities of today’s students. Standardized tests do not reveal what a student actually understands and learns, but instead only prove how well a student can do on a generic test. Schools have an obligation to prepare students for life, and with the power standardized tests have today, students are being cheated out of a proper, valuable education and forced to prepare and improve their test skills. Too much time, energy, and pressure to succeed are being devoted to standardized tests. Standardized testing, as it is being used presently, is a flawed way of testing the skills of today’s students.
...aring in mind the information said, it is now safe to say that the standardized testing process is to a large extent unnecessary on estimating a child’s cerebral capability because their attention is too much on the child’s performance on that day as an alternative to their progress throughout the year and they don’t anticipate the child’s personality and other qualities besides their academic knowledge. On the other hand, standardized tests can be to a small extent necessary because it helps teachers lend a helping hand to students so they can ameliorate their knowledge. Considering all that’s been said, standardized testing after all is not the solution. We must teach kids how to think outside the box, not how to fill in test circles. It is now time to create a new testing method that is proven equitable and most importantly, beneficial to a child’s education.
Have you ever woken up in the morning and felt like not going to the college the whole day? Of course you have. You think of skipping all the classes, but then you contemplate on the consequences of the choice. The attendance will suffer. You’d miss out on that important question or in some people’s case you’d miss out on the exam. You vote against it and go. Now in the above case you had a choice of whether to go to the classes or not, and you chose to go. That decision may prove to be fruitful or a rather disastrous one, but whatever it may be you have to deal with the consequences that come with it. We make countless decisions every day, every moment and once a choice has been made, the actions play out, and the consequence is delivered. We have to live with those consequences. Our choices and decisions guide our lives and build our futures. Whether people notice it or not, the choices we make today affect our tomorrow.
High school testing is not beneficial to students and just wastes thousands of dollars to give these tests. Art programs are being dropped because testing is more important and these programs can be beneficial to the student. Also, very important educational decisions are being made from the results of one test. This puts a lot of pressure of the student and can dramatically affect the results. In order to get an accurate, beneficial result, the student must take these high stakes tests but class work, teacher evaluations, and portfolios need to be incorporated as well.
Testing is one of the big issues in our education system. The idea that the whole school curriculum should be planned around tests is a foolish one, if we want to get a quality education that we can actually learn something valuable from. Having students cram empty facts and memorize test answers is not teaching them it is just encouraging more stress and late nights. On some occasions, tests are a necessary evil to see if the student has actually learned anything from what they have been taught, but to gear the whole class a...
Many don’t realize that the road to success isn’t so much a road as it is a winding,