Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Privacy issues on internet surveillance
Surveillance in america
Surveillance in america
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Privacy issues on internet surveillance
"Should the Government Monitor the Internet? Today the internet is not a safe place. But it still shouldn’t be monitored by the government. People may want it to be monitored, but right after that happens they’re going to want it gone. Just think, everything you do will be seen by the Government, and I mean everything. Would you want that?
But what are the pros about having everything we do on the internet viewed by the Government? First, it would be a way safer place because most places like the dark web would be stopped. But that’s really the only good thing about it. Do you really think that the Government would do anything else? Except looking at your internet history.
Now, what are some of the pros of not having the Government look at what we do on the internet? First, we would have our own privacy. Second, we don’t have to worry about anyone looking at what we searched up. Finally, we could search up what we want with no worry at all. Those are the pros of not having the Government look at what we do on the internet.
…show more content…
Mostly because they say they have nothing to hide. Well, I have nothing to hide but I don’t want the Government seeing what I do on the internet. On a debate website, 52% of people on there say no to this. But they don’t have any reason on why.
48% of people say yes to this. They also have reasons for why they agree with it. So should the Government monitor us on the internet because people who agree with it actually have reasons on why they
...rk with us. This can have a major impact on the economy, and may eventually lead to a weakened nation overall. However, it can be argued that the United States is not acting hypocritical through mass surveillance over the internet. While there's some overlap of the issues, the existence of surveillance does not cut off the freedom of speech on the Internet."One can recognize... there is a very large difference between censorship and spying... On some level, we know that spying and espionage is going to take place. This still doesn't mean we promote censorship." (Verveer, 2013) Undoubtedly, the censorship by the agency over the internet may make users think twice about what opinions to express, but as long as no major crimes are being planned, then the agency will not really care about what is said online, and internet users are free to say whatever they would like.
Edward Snowden is America’s most recent controversial figure. People can’t decide if he is their hero or traitor. Nevertheless, his leaks on the U.S. government surveillance program, PRISM, demand an explanation. Many American citizens have been enraged by the thought of the government tracing their telecommunication systems. According to factbrowser.com 54% of internet users would rather have more online privacy, even at the risk of security (Facts Tagged with Privacy). They say it is an infringement on their privacy rights of the constitution. However, some of them don’t mind; they believe it will help thwart the acts of terrorists. Both sides make a good point, but the inevitable future is one where the government is adapting as technology is changing. In order for us to continue living in the new digital decade, we must accept the government’s ability to surveil us.
Through all the components of the Internet it becomes easy to transfer material that particular governments might find objectionable. However, all of these means of communicating on the Internet make up a large and vast system. For inspectors to monitor every e-mail, every article in every Newsgroup, every Webpage, every IRC channel, every Gopher site and every FTP site would be near impossible. Besides taking an extraordinary amount of money and time, attempts to censor the Internet violate freedom of speech rights that are included in democratic constitutions and international laws.11 It would be a breach of the First Amendment. The Constitution of the United States of America declares that Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redr ess of grievances 12 Therefore it would be unconstitutional for any sort of censorship to occur on the Internet and affiliated services.
Imagine living in a country where people know that their online activity and searches are unmonitored, therefore, nothing can be traced back to them. Every post or message will go unnoticed regardless of the threat it may pose. The National Security Agency (NSA) has become a controversial subject after being linked to performing online surveillance on Americans. While many may feel like their privacy is being violated, very few stop to consider the other side of the coin. To begin with, the NSA has a responsibility to protect the United States with every tool at its disposal. Just as the road traffic is monitored for public safety, online monitoring is essential to the
"The uncensored, tantalizing, wondrous mind of the Internet shall be observed carefully. It is not so much about removing our privacy, it is about preserving our safety. Not having the government monitor search engines and ambitious websites is the error. With the constant threats of terrorism and our fate uncertain with the rise of murder rates and crime, we cannot afford not have them keep the Internet under surveillance.
Terrorism, it's one of the worst things that can ever happen to mankind. The NSA’s goal is to prevent this horrible threat and save lives. So far the NSA has prevented 54 terrorist attacks around the world. Take a second to think about how many lives have been able to be lived because of this. Many people would say the NSA are stalkers and should not be doing what they're doing, tell that to the thousands of lives that have been saved. As of right now the NSA is monitoring about 200 phone numbers for FBI security. That means you have less than a 1% chance of being monitored. Unless you are a terrorist with evil plots, I highly doubt that the less than 1% of people being “stalked” is you. This is why the NSA is barely an infringement on privacy.
There should be no such thing online which would prevent you from showing to the government. Illegal images, prurient videos, cyber bullying, cyber fraud should all be prevented and should not be free for all. It should not be used as a weapon. The society should be protected against all these dangers. It is not a big deal for us to give up a little of our liberties in exchange for some given protections to our fellow citizens. This great amount of freedom is not really leading to anything positive or benefiting us to a great
It is almost hypocritical to support government monitoring of the internet because of safety or precautions in America, but support the ownership of approximately half the guns in the entire world, and have the most gun related deaths in the westernized world. These contrasting viewpoints stand alone in how America oversteps in internet surveillance as an excuse for safety and economic measures but not support gun regulations that have caused deaths of thousands. Again, there should be a healthy middle in both of these topics instead of the opposing spectrums of both
Most of the Internet regulation is imposed by the Government in an effort to protect the best interest of the general public and is concerned with some form of censorship.
We might think we are doing something privately, but there might be people or organizations that can see everything you do. I, personally, am against this, because everyone needs to have his or her own private space, without been watched by anyone else. Everyone needs to do things that don´t need to be seen by anyone else, thinking it is completely private. This believes are wrong, due to several organizations throughout the world (such as the CIA, the NSA, etc.) that look on people´s Internet researches, conversations, pictures, etc.
They believe this because the public considers it an invasion of privacy. Freedom has been an issue for centuries. Is it right for the government to know all of our private information? As technology has developed and become essential to our society, many government commissioners dread social media and its authority and power in our society – but does this give them the authority to monitor online content? This means that the government would have access to personal and confidential information that the public display on the internet.
" A U.S. citizen’s right to privacy is apparent in Amendment IV of the Constitution, where it states that “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects against unreasonable searches and seizures shall not be violated"" (U.S. Const.). In the modern day, the government is obligated to extend this protection beyond its original intentions, especially to the internet. On the web, there is a greater amount of personal information that can be shared or leaked, leading to a greater opportunity for monitoring. Over the past two decades, this issue has created a controversy: both the innocent and the guilty have been subject to surveillance. In cases where this monitoring is justified—when probable cause
The Internet provides a gateway for an individual to speak freely and anonymously without being targeted to what he or she said. With this said, one of the biggest issues concerning the Internet today is freedom of speech. The issue of free speech on the Internet has been a topic of discussion around the world within the past years. It is a unique communication medium and is powerful than the traditional media[2]. Because the Internet can not be compared equally to other mediums of communication, it deserves the utmost freedom of speech protection from the government. The restriction of speech on the Internet takes away from individual's rights and freedom from experiencing the Internet's benefits and uses. Information found on the Internet is endless and boundless and this poses the question, "should the government be allowed to regulate the information and content being transmitted or posted online?"
Today, society is affected by the many advances in technology. These advances affect almost every person in the world. One of the prevalent advances in technology was the invention and mass use of the Internet. Today more than ever, people around the world use the Internet to support their personal and business tasks on a daily basis. The Internet is a portal into vast amounts of information concerning almost every aspect of life including education, business, politics, entertainment, social networking, and world security. (idebate.com) Although the Internet has become a key resource in developing the world, the mass use of Internet has highlighted a major problem, privacy and the protection of individual, corporate, and even government security . The argument over whether or not the Internet should be controlled by the government has developed into a controversial issue in almost every country in the world.
What they might not understand is that the government is monitoring the internet for our safety. How else would the government find terrorists, school shooters, and other people that can harm citizens? While monitoring the internet, yes the government can see things that we do. Some of those things that we do we might want to hide or hide them thinking that no one can see them but the government can. The question is, is the government even going to care about what you do on the internet as long as it isn't illegal? They aren’t necessarily looking for you or your secrets, they are focused on looking for the bigger problem, looking to find someone who is a danger to