Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Harmful Reality Of Zoos
Do zoos do more harm than good
The consequences of zoos for animals
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
If you are to choose between carrying on with a typical normal life at home and being imprisoned in a castle, what would you possibly choose? Now what about being imprisoned in one room? As Williams (2009) said, “Man is not the sole animal that strives after freedom and space” (p. 56). Therefore, imagine the extent of people’s cruelty to imprison animals and confine them for the sake of their safety! According to Association of Zoos and Aquariums (AZA), there are around 2500 zoos worldwide but only 225 of them are licensed. In spite of the claimed advantages of zoos, they are unsafe and needless places that should be banned. Such decision is necessary due to the fact that zoos are cruel and cause psychological suffering for animals because of changing their habitats to a confined unsuitable place. As a start, zoos are cruel towards animals. Depending on Oxford Dictionaries, a cruel …show more content…
In fact, Captive Animals' Protection Society (CAPS) declared in its survey that: “Sea Life Aquariums acknowledged taking animals from the wild, but refused admitting the number of animals they wild-caught” (“10 facts about zoos,” 2011, para. 24). It is noticeable that the number of animals captured by Sea Life Aquariums is large so they would not admit. It is “barbarous” to keep animals far from their natural territories with no freedom and no ecological enrichment (Roberts, 2009, para. 2). Moreover, animals in zoos are kept in enclosures or cages with unsuitable and inappropriate circumstances. Regardless of the size of the cage, the regular territory, which is wild, is constantly more spacious (Roberts, 2009, para. 8). Even if it is not, wild remains the main place that creatures consider as home, so they will be psychologically and mentally relieved. After all, as the aphorism says: “There is no other place like
Since the recent event with a gorilla in the Cincinnati Zoo, people have questioned ethics. The author wrote this argument to explain why the safety of animals, as well as their survival in the future, depends on these enclosures. Some readers would accept that zoos and aquariums conduct a lot of research, but for those who are skeptical, the argument discusses that the “Zoological Society of London, for instance, is developing innovative methods to assess the risks of animals contracting disease when they are reintroduced into the wild” (2016, p. 2, para. 7). The effective evidence Ganzert brings in shows readers the benefits of zoos and aquariums in order to appeal to the value of the animals being well contained and protected while they are in the enclosures. Another strong example of Ganzert’s appeal to an audience that wants the facts is “The Phoenix Zoo helped lead the ensuing breeding and reintroduction programs, which ultimately birthed more than 200 calves from just nine individuals. Now between Oman and Jordan, there are about 1,000 Arabian Oryx living in the wild” (2016, p. 2, para. 4). In result, the audience receives information about an existing program as well as what has happened due to the creation of this program at the Phoenix Zoo.
Zoo captivity is substandard and inadequate for animals. Zoo animals are deprived of their right as animals they are treated unjustly and unfairly. Animals should not be forced to kept in a cage away from their natural environment and be used as a form of entertainment to humans. The animals also suffer from stress and are driven insane by being trapped behind bars. The zoo is supposed to provide safety to these endangered animals but instead, these zoo animals are put at risk towards a variety of dangers such as vulnerability to diseases and starvation.
The difference between right and wrong is not always perfectly clear. A long-standing part of cultures across the world, zoological and animal parks have been around for hundreds of years. While in the past concerns and issues regarding the ethical problems zoos seem to impose were less prominent, in recent times the rise of animal rights activist groups and new generational values have influenced the way people view these parks. Critics believe that zoos are an unnatural habitat for animals and force them to live in captivity, having a negative impact on their health. Yet, there are still many who fully support zoos, citing business and educational reasons.
Thousands of zoos worldwide are visited by citizens yearly to admire and satisfy their curiosity of the beautiful wild animals that mother nature has to offer. Zoos have been around for hundreds of years and have become a known tradition for numerous school field trips and family outings. The ongoing debate between animal rights activists and zoo officials remains, should wild animals be taken from their natural habitats to live in city zoos for education and entertainment purposes?
Animals, particularly the larger ones, are unable to live comfortably in small enclosures. Zoos tend to forget that larger animals have the hardest times getting used to the spaces that they are forced to live in. According to James Nolan’s article, “All the Reasons Why Zoos Should Be Banned”, “…the average lion or tiger has 18,000 times less [space] in captivity than it does in the wild; polar bears a million times less [space]” (7). Although zoos try to recreate their natural habitats, they cannot possibly succeed. The animals, if not born at the zoo, lived in large areas and had all of the freedom that they
"Do We Need Zoos?" : An All Creatures Animal Rights Article. N.p., n.d. Web. 03 May 2015.
One of the many disadvantages animals have is being locked in cages of zoos, is to enjoy the quality of freedom and independence. The animals can’t enjoy the satisfaction of catching their own prey, or the relief of living in their own natural habitat. Plus, the size of the zoo provides for the animals is too small, so the animals don’t get the proper exercise like they would in the wild. Studies have shown tigers and lions have around 18,000 times less space in zoos then they would in their natural habitat. In fact , Woburn Safari Parks was keeping its lion...
Watermelons; deeply-rooted fruits growing connected to other products on vines are a popular summertime snack. These treasures are a staple in the Southern way of living as well as throughout pop culture with social media pages going wild for watermelons. Locally, there is a town that has been going wild for watermelons for 37 years with the fruit becoming a symbol for the small-town gem. Russellville, AL, just 30 miles south of the Tennessee River, is home of the Franklin County Watermelon Festival a two-day extravaganza held the third weekend of August yearly.
middle of paper ... ... Freedom is precious and animals are constantly suffering mentally and physically from the lack of freedom that captivity brings to them. Although many zoos are visited by millions of people annually, they still operate at a loss and have to make budget cuts. Funds that should be used to provide humane conditions for animals are often wasted on cosmetic improvements such as landscaping, refreshment stands, and gift shops in order to draw visitors, leaving the animals behind steel bars and glass trapped in a concrete jungle for no reason without hope of ever being free.
Even though some zoos have an endangered species exhibit with the intention of protecting and rehabilitating animals, many do not do an adequate job of protecting the animals. Zoos have been harmful to the very animals they have sworn to protect. Animals in captivity often suffer from anxiety, boredom and other severe issue related to prolonged confinement. Most animals are unable to thrive in small enclosure with unnatural weather and climates. For example elephants are known to walk as far as 30 miles per day, but the association of Zoos and aquariums only require a space the measures $0 feet by 45 feet, which is about the size of a three car garage, to house these large animals. (peta.org) the drastic difference in the amount of space their allowed ...
Zoos display fascinating animals from all over the world for human entertainment, research, conservation, and education. Many scientists conduct studies on animals in captivity that they may not have been able to in the wild. Zoos educate all the visitors that come; they let people know everything that they know about the animals on display. We do learn a lot from these animals, but not all of the animals in the zoo are behaving like they normally would in the wild. Larger animals, such as elephants and orcas (commonly known as killer whales), have trouble with being confined in such a small area. However, many smaller animals benefit from zoos because they provide protection from predators, natural disasters, and poachers. They also benefit from conservation efforts; the babies being born get all the care they could ever need. Some animal rights activists are concerned that the conservation efforts are limiting the gene pool of the species. They argue that the small number of animals able to breed in captivity limits biodiversity and leads to weaknesses in the species overall. Zoos are wonderful places to study and learn about animals, but we need to improve the living standards for animals that struggle with captivity.
As if that alone isn’t enough to prove that zoos are cruel and unfair, there are many professionals and experts who gravely look down upon zoos, too. Delcianna Winders, director with the PETA foundation, said “Renowned oceanographer Jean-Michel Cousteau reported that he was forever changed after witnessing a captive dolphin commit suicide by ramming his head into a tank wall.... ... middle of paper ... ...
These “performances” teach audiences nothing about how animals behave under normal circumstances. Animals in zoos are forced to spend their lives behind bars just to entertain the public. Living conditions are often terrifying, with animals confined to tiny, filthy, barren enclosures. But even the best artificial environments cannot come close to matching the space, diversity, and freedom that animals want and need.
For hundreds of decades animals have been the center of entertainment for humans. They are used in circuses, zoos, aquariums, and other animal-based exhibits. However, how many of us actually take the time to consider if this involuntary imprisonment is doing more harm than good? Not many take into account the permanent effects these animals suffer from being locked in cages or small spaces for 95% of their life. Using captive animals to entertain humans should be considered unlawful and cruel because of the physical and mental repercussions that are caused and because they are not educational.
The caging of wild animals for entertainment and pleasure manifests an ongoing debate in today’s world. In regarding the deliberation over the humaneness of zoos, Britain menageries are investigated on their quality of care and how it affects the health of the animals. As many scholars explore this topic they oftentimes present research containing gaps that neglect important information. These gaps particularly include how to resolve or prevent the studied causes of the low animal health. It is essential to address how these causes can be barred because it can lead to the improvement of healthcare within Britain zoos, and the improved care can ultimately lead to less dissent of zoos as a whole.