Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Overpopulation solutions essay
Social issue due to overpopulation
Overpopulation solutions essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The famous astrophysicist Carl Sagan once showed a picture of the Earth from hundreds of miles in space, looking like a dot. He said to a crowd “Look again at that dot. That 's here.
That 's home. That 's us. On it everyone you love, everyone you know, everyone you ever heard of, every human being who ever was, lived out their lives. The aggregate of our joy and suffering, thousands of confident religions, ideologies, and economic doctrines, every hunter and forager, every hero and coward, every creator and destroyer of civilization, every king and peasant, every young couple in love, every mother and father, hopeful child, inventor and explorer, every teacher of morals, every corrupt politician, every ‘superstar,’ every ‘supreme
leader,’
…show more content…
Soon, vertical farming will be perfected and everything will be cheap and efficient.
Moreover, as the Earth 's population of humans grow, resources will diminish. Currently, there are "more than 800 million people in" the world who "don 't have enough to eat" (Dimick
2). When "one in eight" people go hungry in the world with 7 billion people, it is quite logical to
Espinoza 6 begin vertical farming to feed the masses, and keep them from starving. They will eat everything exterminating millions of species of animals for food. Within the skyscraper farms "crops could grow and be harvested all yearround", which will multiply the annual food harvest by four
(Fischetti 1). Food shall be closer to the urban community, with greater quantity and better quality. This will cut the shipping of food, causing carbon emissions to decrease as well as food prices. Vertical farming includes many bonuses that could help the earth from the current state that it 's in due to human activities.. First with the vertical farming, “crops can be produced all year long" (Roach). Next, it could also reduces "carbon emissions from shipping crops across continents and ocean” (Roach) And, it may decrease the amount of greenhouse gases in
…show more content…
Farming tools and techniques have been developed to make the farmers job much more easier than it once was 2000 years ago. So, should not the whole process be remade to be more effective? With vertical farming the inside of the buildings are controlled, so farmers would no longer be dependent on the mercy of the weather. Everything will be controlled, which will help produce high quantities and good quality food.
Overpopulation has become a drastic issue, for no one knows how many people the earth can sustain. So, people have been thinking up with solutions to deal with the exponentially increasing human race. There are ideas of interplanetary colonization, education of developing nations, conservation of natural resources, and implementation the onechild policy worldwide.
Espinoza 7
However, the greatest of solutions is vertical farming, which is building farms upwards within cities, These farms are to produce food for growing billions. Many may not agree that vertical farming is the greatest solution to the world’s exponentially growing population, but with logical arguments one can prove that vertical farming is extremely necessary.
To begin with, there are many people that believe that the education of the third
A positive result of the movement would be the return of health to the land. In Paul Robert’s book, he mentions the superior effects of the locavore movement. According to a UK-based study he used, “Such a shift would bring back diversity to the land… destroyed by chemical-intensive mono-cropping…” (Source F). As large corporation farmers plant only one crop repetitively with the aid of chemicals, the land used becomes unhealthy, and eventually sterile from the lack of nutrients. With the locavore movement, farmland can be saved as local farmers only sell to local buyers. These farmers will only have to plant what buyers need, and have the opportunity to plant diverse crops. These different crops naturally regenerate the land with different nutrients, keeping the environment more healthy. On the contrary, the locavore movement may harm the environment due to the likelihood of forming a large carbon footprint. In James McWilliam’s business article about the locavore movement, he gives the example of a Londoner wanting to buy local lamb instead of lamb from New Zealand. “...New Zealand lamb is raised on pastures with a small carbon footprint… English lamb is produced… with a big carbon footprint” (Source C). Even though food may come from far away, the process of producing the food may be better for the environment. Such as cattle, packaging and feeding them in a factory-farm may create more pollution and harm the environment. If the product is more naturally fed and packaged, pollution can be reduced and be more environmentally friendly. The environmental issues associated with the locavore movement are significant as they can both improve and hurt the environment. The more diverse, local crops grown can help keep the soil healthy, perhaps making people’s bodies more healthy as chemical use is slimmed or ignored. This could trigger a growth in society’s overall health. However, the
As the world population grows so does the amount of people that live without the proper amount of nutrition and food. Hunger in America can be hard to recognize and many people do not realize that hunger and malnutrition is a problem that many Americans face every day. America is the land of plenty and one of the most powerful and wealthy countries in the world, however is well known that is subject to problem such as starvation, considered as “third-world problem”. For decades, Americans have gone above and beyond to aid other countries that were faced with problems such as malnutrition and hunger. Sadly, the US has failed to aid them and millions are currently suffering from hunger. In addition, with how the economy is now, the effects of hunger are getting worse every day. Many Americans are relying and most of them depend on food stamps and private organizations to help with this crisis. The documentary, “A Place at the Table” by Kristi Jacobson and Lori Silverbush present some issues and real life story to explain what is really happening and how hunger and obesity are not problems on opposite ends of a spectrum, but are in fact intricately linked. Poor nutrition, health problem and poverty are all related.
about 50% of the people in the world are in some degree malnourished. He uses
The small farms of America are scrutinized every day for what they grow and raise. Most of the small farms around America go through more and more regulations because the big farming corporations are able to pay the government off so they can grow and raise there items their own way. When most people look at small farms they see organic and healthy; for big corporations, though, a lot see short cuts and GMO's. Peter Singer also calls large corporate farms "factory farms" because they just keep growing and never stop but in the eyes of many that's ok. Shouldn't a small farm should have a right to farm what they want also, because of the good they can do for their community. So Americans should start buying organic and local because it can grow
Rossett, Peter. “Preventing hunger: change economic policy.” Nature 479.7374 (2011): 472+. Academic OneFile. Web. 11 Feb. 2014.
Nearly 20% of the American population goes hungry every day. There is absolutely no way that this should be true considering the fact that there is more than enough food, in regards to a healthy caloric intake, for everyone in America to be well feed every day. The problem is so relevant that many people go to great extremes to get food. These extremes can go as far as committing crime such a stealing, selling drugs, robbing, etc. Even though this is not a guaranteed response it is one of many
With the rapid growth of our global population pouring into the next millennium, we will witness an ever-growing hunger rate around the world. That is unless we call for a revolution on the global scale. The Green Revolution which already sprouted in the early part of the century only need to add a bit more momentum and we will see a bright future for the human race, a future without hunger and starvation ¡V hopefully.It is becoming increasingly difficult for the planet to support its overwhelming population. And since the amount of arable land available is becoming scarce, we must seek ways to dramatically improve crop yields of existing cropland.
There has been an increase in the hunger and starvation rates all over the world. It is documented that nearly one billion people suffer from hunger and related illnesses each and every day (Eggebeen & Lichter, 12). In the United States of America, many people have been known to suffer from hunger. The most people who suffer from starvation and hunger are the low class and some middle class income earners. This has caused so many deaths, and it has been one of the factors that has caused so many deaths and increased mortality rates in the United States. According to research conducted by the household food security in the United States, they found out that approximately fifteen percent of all the households in America suffered from moderate
Reduce the cost of vegetables and fruits and bring local farmers into the equation over large corporations.
How, in a country full of 318.9 million people, are there 16 million children that are not getting the food they need? It is crazy to think about it possibly even being your son’s or daughter’s friend. “1 in 7 people struggle to get enough to eat,” the organization, Feeding America, claims. The main questions we need to ask when assessing this is how, why, and what can we do? So, how? Approximately 46.7 million people are in poverty, and that includes 15.5 million children. If a family is in poverty, that normally means they are going hungry. Why? The reasons can be endless, it could be
Knox, Paul, and Sllie Marston. "Chapter 8 Food and Agriculture." In Human Geography: Places and Regions in Global Context. Glenview, Il: Pearson, 2013. 266-298.
The farm does not require digging, watering, planting, weeding or fertilization, yet you get to harvest produce in abundance every year. Using the system, you will get to harvest 8 times what traditional farming methods will give you. What’s more, this is a system that anybody can benefit you even if you don’t have a large
How people survive is adapted over time. Through cultivation, the idea of intentionally promoting the growth of certain plants for human use, many societies are able to support more people within their community. Creating a smart and effective way to feed the entire society benefits the society as a whole. With new innovations and techniques cultivation emerged independently in different parts of the world. When comparing horticulture with agriculture the two understand and incorporate cultivation by devoting their time to improve and stabilize the production of crops. Both acquired techniques are adopted to reproduce and support the community. However, they can be contrasted and compared from the different techniques used and how effective
Danielle Knight stated that “The true source of world hunger is not scarcity but policy; not inevitability but politics, the real culprits are economies that fail to offer everyone opportunities, and societies that place economic efficiency over compassion.” The author is trying to say that, basically, world hunger is mainly caused by us humans. The world is providing more than enough food for each and every one of us on earth according to the report - 'World Hunger: Twelve Myths'. The problem is that there are so many people living in the third world countries who do not have the money to pay for readily available food. Even if their country has excess food, they still go hungry because of poverty. Since people are mistaken by “scarcity is the real cause of this problem”, governments and institutions are starting to solve food shortage problems by increasing food production, while there really is an excess of food in some countries. Although the green revolution was a big success globally, hunger still exists in some countries. The author stated, “Large farms, free-markets, free trade, and more aid from industrialized countries, have all been falsely touted as the ‘cure’ to end hunger”. All of those are used to promote exports and food production, it doesn’t increase the poor’s ability to buy food he says. What the government really should do is to balance out the economy, and let more people earn more money to buy more foods.
...o climate change. All of these have caused an impact on the ability to produce crops and grow agriculturally. Climate change has been increasing the number of droughts, floods, health hazards of employees, natural disasters, and sea level elevations. All of these put in danger the crop productivity resulting in famines and food price increments. Climate change affects agriculture in every country differently due to its location. Countries such as Canada and Russia are being affected positively by climate change since it has enabled the country to prosper agriculturally. Other countries cannot handle drastic temperature changes, such as Sudan and Bangladesh, whose agricultural growth has been affected negatively by the climatic changes. Agriculture is fundamental in a country, creating a balance between agriculture and the increasing climatic changes would be ideal.