Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Two sides of stem cell research
Ethics of stem cell research 2016
Ethical theories stem cell research
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Two sides of stem cell research
Stem cell research is known to be a major taboo practice throughout the United States. In
July 2015 Planned Parenthood received a substantial amount of backlash when a representative
was video recorded making an attempt to sell aborted fetuses for research purposes. This video
brought stem cell research into light and received a lot of controversy amongst the United States.
Based on religious values, many individuals in the United States believe that stem cell research is
unethical and morally wrong. Culturally speaking, the United States is a country that has a
melting pot of different cultures and beliefs. Because of this, many people view stem cell
research as a way of mimicking or playing the role of God, the ultimate creator. Although this
may be a valid point, stem cells have the potential to save lives and possibly cure a myriad of
diseases. An argument that can be posed to pro-lifers is, at what point does an individual become
a human? Even if stem cell research may destroy a possible “human” life, future lives can be
gained because of it. Stem cells have the ability to develop into a
…show more content…
variety of cell types in the body during the early stages of life. Furthermore, stem cell research is important for the development of cures for degenerative diseases.
Some stem cells even have the ability to repair and replace
damaged tissues. The emerging use of stem cell research is a relatively new concept. Due to the
increasing rate of diseases being more common within our society, and the possibility of
regeneration with organs, stem cell research is imperative. With the possibility of degenerative
diseases being cured and valuable lives being saved, stem cell research is on the path of
becoming the new norm. I believe that the use of stem cell research seems promising towards the
advancement of our society and will provide remedies for diseases and cancers that society could
not even imagine to be curable. This paper will discuss the importance of furthering research into the full scope of stem cell therapy and suggest the benefits of stem cell research to state officials and government
agencies. Stem cell research has a myriad of benefits. Although stem cell therapy has a multitude of advantages, it has sparked intense condemnation. The amount of criticism that stem cell therapy has receiving is detracting the support of stem cell research. Due to conflicting ethical attitudes surrounding the use of embryonic stem cells in research, numerous barriers have been created for researchers in this field and funding is becoming harder to receive. Funding offers endless possibilities for regulatory oversight of stem cell research. Without public funding, progress towards medical therapies will impede. The more time that scientists spend on collecting data on stem cells, the closer they are to discovering breakthrough cures for chronic and degenerative diseases. Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death in the world, with about 11 million people dying each year (Source). Regenerative medicine can provide the transplantation of new tissue in patients with damaged or diseased organs (Source). The biological aspect of stem cell research is important in gaining an understanding of why stem cell research is perceived the way it is in the United States. Unfortunately, the rate of degenerative diseases becoming recurrent within our society is growing at an alarming rate. For example, Parkinson’s is a disease that attacks an individual’s central nervous system causing tremors and difficulty with motor movement. Parkinson’s is a disease that attacks the dopamine cells within the brain, and can lead to memory loss. Parkinson’s does not have a known cure. Stem cell research opens a broad horizon of hope when dealing with degenerative diseases. Stem cell’s ability to replace and repair damaged cells paves way for the use of stem cell research and can provide hope for new solutions. A study that was completed in 2014, found that motor nerves are identical to fetal motor nerves, meaning that patients with Parkinson’s disease may be able to use these stem cells in order to replace damaged nerves. The method these researchers performed was that they, “…transplanted hESC-derived DA (hESC-DA) neurons to the striatum of 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA) lesioned athymic, adult rats, allowing for long-term graft survival in the absence of immunosuppressive treatment. The grafted animals were followed up to 6 months after transplantation, the point at which grafts of fetal VM in patients start to become functional” (Parmar). This all means that the researchers injected human embryonic cells, which were from excess in vitro fertilization (IVF) embryos, into rats that were bred to have Parkinson’s and allowed six months to progress in order to study the results. Dopamine is essential to the replenishment of motor nerves; therefore, it is imperative that the rats develop normal levels of dopamine in order to sustain motor sensory. The study showed that, after five months, the rats were able to produce normal levels of dopamine. Although these results may only be the initial steps of performing stem cell research on humans, this study could bring new advancements in the cure for Parkinson’s disease as well as other degenerative diseases. As stated earlier, the United States is known to be a melting pot of different cultures. According to the Pew Research Center, Christians comprise of about 70.6% of the United States population. The Christian view that human life is produced at conception contrasted with the view common amongst Jews is that an embryo is not considered a human until 40 days after conception, and the similar Muslim view that human life begins when the soul enters the developing baby sometime between 40 days and 120 days after conception. The variation of beliefs of when an embryo can be distinguished as a human is what causes the level of acceptance for stem cell research. Stem cell research is supported in the Muslim and Jewish community, yet is strongly opposed by the Catholic Church and Protestant denominations. Many Christians believe that stem cell research tampers with the role of God and that an individual should not have the power to be able to manipulate a human’s life. The less conservative sect of Christianity supports stem cell research as long as it is specifically using adult stem cells, as opposed to embryonic stem cells. The problem that arises with that is, there is a rich source of stem cells in the embryonic and fetal stage. Opposing sides believe that until the government provides ethical guidelines, such as using adult stem cells, then society should not perform any kind of stem cell research. With the possibility of degenerative diseases being cured and valuable lives being saved, stem cell research is on the path of becoming the new norm. The use of stem cell research seems promising towards the advancement of our society and will provide remedies for diseases and cancers that society could not even imagine to be curable.
At first fetal tissue stem cell research was "conducted without and scrutiny from the public sector" but after Roe vs Wade things got a little more heated. In 1928 Italian researchers performed the first ever, documented, "procedure" with fetal tissue where doctor took the pancreas of a fetus and "put it in" a patient with diabetes to see if the patients condition would improve how...
Stem cell research has been a heated and highly controversial debate for over a decade, which explains why there have been so many articles on the issue. Like all debates, the issue is based on two different arguments: the scientific evolution and the political war against that evolution. The debate proves itself to be so controversial that is both supported and opposed by many different people, organizations, and religions. There are many “emotional images [that] have been wielded” in an attempt to persuade one side to convert to the other (Hirsen). The stem cell research debate, accompanied by different rhetoric used to argue dissimilar points, comes to life in two articles and a speech: “Should Human Cloning Be Allowed? Yes, Don’t Impede Medical Progress” by Virginia Postrel; “Should Human Cloning Be Allowed? No, It’s a Moral Monstrosity” by Eric Cohen and William Kristol; and “Remarks by Ron Reagan, Jr., to the 2004 Democratic National Convention” by Ron Reagan, Jr. Ethos, pathos, and logos are the main categories differentiating the two arguments.
The cells unique nature has scientists intrigued to do research with the focus of finding a way that these cells can be used to replace patients’ injured or diseased tissues. Advancement is made to all the three types of stem cells namely embryonic stem cells, adult stem cells in addition to induced pluripotent cells. Embryonic cells are the building blocks of an embryo that is developing, and can develop into almost all body cell types. Somatic cells are found in the body tissues. They renew and regenerate in healthy bodies. The third type which is induced pluripotent is genetically modified embryo cells from skin cells.2 Research on these cells are geared towards saving humanity; a noble course.
This belief is wrong. Many countries including the United States have laws regarding embryonic stem cells. The United States has limits on when you can take embryos and there off course has to be consent from the donor of the stem cells. All these regulations are being met and the research is being done safely and in a way that always keeps safety as a first priority. New procedures and uses of stem cells also have to be deemed safe or the risks have to at least be shared before treatment can take place. These regulations make sure stem cells are being used in a safe way and that you know the facts about the way researchers are using
On October 13, 2001 the scientist of Advance Cell Technology come to see that their laboratory cells were dividing, the first human embryos were cloning.
Over the past decade scientist and the U.S government have been debating about funds for stem cell research (SCR), the amount spent depends on who is in office. The Democratic Party fully supports SCR, but the Republican Party somewhat opposes the concept of SCR, arfuing it violates the Christian principle of life. As a result, this topic is considered controversial, but also beneficial if allowed. Despite the controversy, SCR should be well funded for medicinal use, because blank stem cells (SC) can be used to regenerate bones and muscle tissue, they can be used to control or even reverse neurodegenerative disease, and because they can be used for therapeutic cloning.
Followers of Christianity, for example, base their values on the teachings of the Bible or more specifically the Ten Commandments. The Ten Commandments are a set of rules that are literally from God himself. The Ten Commandments are: You shall have no other gods before Me. You shall make no idols. You shall not take the name of the Lord your God in vain. Keep the Sabbath day holy. Honor your father and your mother. You shall not murder. You shall not commit adultery. You shall not steal. You shall not bear false witness against your neighbor. You shall not covet. These commandments are believed to determine right from wrong by Christians. This is called Divine Command Theory, which means that whatever God commands is morally right. Concerning stem cell research, “You shall not murder” is the commandment that is broken. For the same reason abortion is wrong in the eyes of Christianity, the use of stem cells is wrong as well. An embryo must be harvested and destroyed in order to harvest stem cells, and since Christians consider unborn babies as people, it is murder to terminate a pregnancy. This belief has caused millions to stand against stem cell research for decades. While those who support it, focus on the number of lives that could be
Because stem cells are essentially a blank slate, scientists are theoretically capable of growing any human tissue cell. There is enormous medical potential in this. Stem cell research is the next step in advancing the medical field. It is comparable to the discovery of penicillin or the inoculation for smallpox.
Imagine that there is a cure for nearly every ailment that affects the human race. Imagine that you could help the terminally ill, put those you love out of pain, and cut the healing time of an enormous number of serious illnesses in half. Imagine a world in which pain and suffering would be nearly nonexistent, and the people you love can live safe from the fear of crippling injury. Now what if I told you that this utopia was a fast approaching reality? Everything from serious life threatening burns to lymphoma, AIDS, Alzheimer’s, Muscular Dystrophy, Parkinson’s Disease, Spinal Cord Injury, and Strokes could, in the very near future, be eliminated through the simple culturing and implementation of stem cell therapy . These diseases are no small component of the myriad of conditions that plagues the human race, and yet, the end for these horrible maladies could very well be in sight. Man has always sought to end suffering, largely without success, until now. the promise that stem cell therapy holds could completely change our world for the better. Already, stem cell therapy is being used to treat leukemia, immune disorders, hodgkins and non-hodgkins lymphoma, anemia and a profusion of other ailments. As you all know, this is no small accomplishment. One day i believe that we may look at alzheimer's and diabetes and other major illnesses much like we look at polio today, as a treatable illness. Right now, our research with stem cells is providing us with new light into how we look at and model disease, our ability to understand why we get sick and even to develop new drugs. In 2008, a researcher from the New York Stem Cell Foundation Laborato...
...velopment of tissues to replace damaged organs in the human body. Scientists have discovered for the first time how stem cells could be generated from embryo’s that were produced using adult stem cells.
A stem cell is a cell in the body that can differentiate into almost any other type of cell in the body. Stem cells come from sites in the bone marrow, as well as the tissues of developing fetuses. The most controversial issue in stem cell therapy is the use of fetuses for their stem cells. Scientists want to clone human embryos, and use the stem cells long before the embryo matures (when it is only about 36 cells). This causes a large amount of unease in society, because people fear that stem cells and therapeutic cloning will lead us into disgusting and horrible experimental practices, as well as therapies. Most people in America do not want this horrible vision of the future to come true, so they want all stem cell technology and research banned.
Monroe, Kristen, et al., eds. Fundamentals of the Stem Cell Debate: The Scientific, Religious, Ethical and Political Issues. Los Angeles/Berkley: University of California Press, 2008. Print
Stem cells offer exciting promise for future therapies, but significant technical hurdles remain that will only be overcome through years of intensive research. Stem Cells have the incredible potential to develop into many different cell types in the body during early life and growth. Scientists primarily work with two kinds of stem cells from animals and humans. The embryonic stem cells and the non-embryonic stem cells. Stem cells are the cells from which all other cells originate. In a human embryo, a large portion of the embryo’s cells are stem cells. These stem cells can be used for cell-based therapies. Cell-Based therapies are treatments in which stem cells are induced to differentiate into the specific cell type required to repair damaged or destroyed cells or tissues. Stem cells are versatile and offer the possibility to treat a number of diseases including Alzheimer’s, stroke, cardiovascular disease, diabetes, etc. The problem is that for the process of embryonic stem cell research and embryo will be destroyed if used. This raises a moral issue and questions of whether stem cell research is unethical or not.
The stem cell research controversy is one of the major headlines in bioscience and has been discussed and debated numerous times throughout the last decade or so. It became a major issue in 1997/1998 and continued into the 2000’s where George W. Bush joined the problem by vetoing the first bid that was brought forward by Congress to lift funding restrictions on human embryonic stem cell research. Bush stated after the veto that, “would support the taking of innocent human life in the hope of finding medical benefits for others” and also stated “It crosses a moral boundary that our decent society needs to respect”. Bush was also supported by children that he said, “began his or her life as a frozen embryo that was created for in vitro fertilization (in vitro means the technique of performing an experiment in a controlled environment outside of a living organism) but remained unused after the fertility treatments were complete.
... new ways to treat other diseases like the cancer genes that soon could very well be stopped before they even start. The changes it could bring are amazing there is really no reason to stop learning more about helping to heal the human body.