Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Arguments in favor of stem cells
Moral debate of embryonic stem cell research
Embryonic stem cells the moral dilemma
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Arguments in favor of stem cells
Embryonic stem cell research is, perhaps, one of the most divisive ethical issues of the millennium. These cells are thought by many to hold the cures for such diseases as diabetes, Alzheimer's, Parkinson's, heart disease and even cancer. Some researchers believe that these cells could heal spinal cord injuries, allowing a once paralyzed man to walk again. Despite the numerous potential benefits, the issue is exceedingly controversial and has sparked much debate, primarily over one sole reason: embryonic stem cell research causes the destruction of an embryo. This debate can be epitomized into two questions: when does human life begin and what makes an organism human. The answers to these questions are usually opinionated and not backed …show more content…
Consistent with my religion, I believe that human life begins at conception, this belief is also consistent with scientific evidence. “When the egg and sperm join at conception, the baby will have 46 chromosomes in its cells, just like the parents” (Australian Center for Genetics Information). “A human is defined as an organism having 46 chromosomes” (National Institutes for Health). These quotations further proves my point that all embryos are, in fact, human. Therefore, if embryos are human, they should not be killed to be used in …show more content…
However despite this, it should be known that most scientists are not trying to change the human race, but instead are trying to fix the biological hiccups in DNA such as genetic diseases and cancer. Stem Cell research is the future of healthcare and has already led to several medical advancements such as the invention of synthetic insulin. “Scientists have discovered that embryonic stem cells have the potential to cure spinal cord injuries, as well as diseases such as juvenile diabetes, Alzheimer’s, and Parkinson's” (Mendez, “Stem Cell Research,” 18). There are literally endless possibilities for stem cells hidden behind a metaphorical locked door and in order to better understand them, we first need to unlock that door, and the key is hidden somewhere within embryonic stem
A person's individuality begins at conception and develops throughout life. These natural developments can now be changed through genetically engineering a human embryo. Through this process, gender, eye and hair color, height, medical disorders, and many more qualities can be changed. I believe genetically engineering a human embryo is corrupt because it is morally unacceptable, violates the child's rights, and creates an even more divided society.
In the debate over whether the federal government should fund embryonic stem-cell research (ESCR), our country is being offered a true Faustian bargain. In return for a hoped-for potential - it is no more than that - of deriving desperately desired medical breakthroughs in the treatment of such afflictions as Parkinson's disease, paraplegia, and diabetes, we are being asked to give the nation's imprimatur to reducing human life into a mere natural resource to be exploited and commodified.
Late one night a woman is driving home on the freeway, she’s hit head on by a drunk driver and killed. The man is charged with two accounts of murder; the woman, and her four-week-old embryo inside her. By law, everyone human being is guaranteed rights of life; born or unborn they are equal. The same law should be enforced concerning human embryonic stem cell research. Dr. James A. Thomson discovered stem cells in 1998 and they’ve intrigued scientist ever since. The stem cells themselves are derived from a three to four day old cluster of cells called a blastocyst and they are so coveted because they are pluripotent, meaning they can differentiate into any type of cell in the human body. Although embryonic stem cells show amazing potential to cure various disease such as cancer, congestive heart failure, Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease, muscular dystrophies, and more. The methods by which they are obtained is controversial. Research on embryonic stem cells is unethical, unnecessary, and purely homicide.
In my point of view, a human life starts when a mom gives birth to her child. The realization of a human life begins when a child first cries or first opens the eyes. Those are the most beautiful and precious gift in the whole world. I don't agree with the idea that the frozen embryos should be viewed as human. For example, if a doctor can not succeed in implanting the frozen embryos into a woman's body, and they are expelled, would he be arrested as a murder? The answer is no. According to the article, ."..the longest recorded freezing of an embryo that was successfully implanted in a woman was twenty-eight months." Therefore, the frozen embryos can be disposed of by time if nobody is going to implant them into a woman's body. They are just some undifferentiated cells.
“In particular, sacrificing human embryos would fundamentally depart from the long-honored Hippocratic ethic which teaches, ‘First do not harm.’” (William Cheshire)
One of the most heated political battles in the United States in recent years has been over the morality of embryonic stem cell research. The embryonic stem cell debate has polarized the country into those who argue that such research holds promises of ending a great deal of human suffering and others who condemn such research as involving the abortion of a potential human life. If any answer to the ethical debate surrounding this particular aspect of stem cell research exists, it is a hazy one at best. The question facing many scientists and policymakers involved in embryonic stem cell research is, which is more valuable – the life of a human suffering from a potentially fatal illness or injury, or the life of human at one week of development? While many argue that embryonic stem cell research holds the potential of developing cures for a number of illnesses that affect many individuals, such research is performed at the cost of destroying a life and should therefore not be pursued.
Benefits of stem cell research can be overwhelming. Today, millions of people around the world suffer from incurable diseases. Stem cell research could help the scientific community find a breakthrough in developing a cure. By observing stem cells develop into mature human tissue, scientists can better understand how embryos develop. “Normal” human development can be recorded. This knowledge can be used to help prevent birth defects, for instance.
Stem cells have the ability to transform into any kind of cell. These cells can divide and also replenish other cells in the body, such as muscle cells, brain cells, red blood cells, or they may just simply remain as stem cells. Stem cells are able to replicate even after long periods of dormancy. They naturally repair damaged tissues and can be experimentally induced to work with particular tissues and organs (NIH, 2013).
Although some find embryonic stem cells unethical, supporting embryonic stem cell research will benefit humankind in many aspects.
As technology stem cell research intensifies, so does the controversy about whether such scientific progress is moral. In the past millennium to today the present stem cell research has become a controversial topic across the world. Stem cells are unspecialized cells that have unique regenerative abilities, allowing them to divide into specialized cell types. Understanding why these processes occur is essential to curing disease. Critics of stem cell research argue that the extraction of embryonic stem cells involves destroying an early embryo, equating the act of killing a human. Although stem cell research is a highly controversial topic, it is compulsory to continue stem cell research within ethical boundaries for the benefit of mankind.
We as Catholics are taught to show respect and protect human life from the moment of conception. From conception, the embryo must be defended, cared for, loved for, and healed, as much as possible, like any other human being should be. God gives life from the moment of conception and we don't have the right to take it away.
Embryonic cells should be allowed to be used because of the medical benefits they provide. They can be used to cure diseases such as Parkinson’s disease, diabetes, traumatic spinal cord injury, Duchenne’s muscular dystrophy, heart disease, and even vision and hearing loss (nih.gov 2009). There is no problem using them for medical purposes and it is not immoral to use them for this reason. Embryonic cells have the potential to save lives. Therefore, the usage of embryonic cells outweighs the ethical issues.
George, the authors discuss about how abortion is morally wrong. According to the authors “human embryos and fetuses are complete (though immature) human beings”. Then they address counter arguments that human embryos are not the same a person because they are not conscious as a person is. The authors respond that human embryos have the “natural capacities” although less developed to reason, therefore according to the authors it makes no sense to say at which point an embryo becomes a person. And the authors conclude that the burden to carry out a pregnancy is less than “killing” the fetus. I also think that is not right to try to label an embryo as a human organism or not a person, it is a human person and it has a right to live. But you cannot force women to carry out a pregnancy they do not want, and no one should have a right to claim over their
Stem cells offer exciting promise for future therapies, but significant technical hurdles remain that will only be overcome through years of intensive research. Stem Cells have the incredible potential to develop into many different cell types in the body during early life and growth. Scientists primarily work with two kinds of stem cells from animals and humans. The embryonic stem cells and the non-embryonic stem cells. Stem cells are the cells from which all other cells originate. In a human embryo, a large portion of the embryo’s cells are stem cells. These stem cells can be used for cell-based therapies. Cell-Based therapies are treatments in which stem cells are induced to differentiate into the specific cell type required to repair damaged or destroyed cells or tissues. Stem cells are versatile and offer the possibility to treat a number of diseases including Alzheimer’s, stroke, cardiovascular disease, diabetes, etc. The problem is that for the process of embryonic stem cell research and embryo will be destroyed if used. This raises a moral issue and questions of whether stem cell research is unethical or not.
While I, along with many other pro-life advocates, believe that human life is set into motion the minute of conception, there is a major group of individuals who would beg to differ. They are strong believers that the embryo is only “potential human”. Many abortionists place confidence in the idea that the embryo is not to be considered as a full human, due to the idea that it is depending fully on its mother. Although this reasoning seems plausible, when analyzed a little deeper, that does not seem to be the case. Imagine the following scenario. A man is driving down the busy road on his motorcycle. All of a sudden, the man loses control of his bike and collides with a car passing him on the road. This man is then rushed to the emergency room where the doctors discover that, although blessed to still be alive, he is completely paralyzed. He now depends exclusively on the health care providers, family and friends for all aspects of his life which he used to be able to complete independently. Does this full dependence on others dehumanize him in any way? No. This man is still a human “by nature”. The paralyzed man’s situation is now comparably similar to the human embryos’. According to the textbook Basics of Biology, life starts at fertilization. This is when the sperm joins the oocyte. In order to distinguish whether an organism is living or not, there are several crucial char...