Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The effects of capital punishment
Media Influence on capital punishment
What are the consequences of capital punishment
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The effects of capital punishment
It’s the story you’ve heard over and over again. Someone is murdered, and then there is a trail where the murderer is found guilty and is put on death row. After that, you lose track of what happens. People assume their killed, or get away. That's how the story goes. What about the other story though, not the one painted by media, but the real true gritty story? Someone is murdered, there is an unfair trial where someone is wrongfully convicted based on mental incapabilities, or social status. They are on the list for months, eventually executed using a drug that sometimes doesn’t work right away, and then months later they are found innocent of all charges. Not only is the victim's family still grieving, but now joining them is the family of the innocent man who was killed for a crime he didn't commit. It’s been said online that “There's no greater authority than the power to take life, and our government currently reserves the authority to kill the citizens it's supposed to serve” (Hyden). Our …show more content…
Killing one human does not bring back the loved one you lost. No matter how hard you try to convince yourself, execution doesn't help anyone. It’s not justice, you won't feel relieved. You are going to wake up the next day and still miss you loved one just as much. The only difference is now their is another family missing their loved one that we felt the need to execute. Now we have two broken families, and no healing has happened. None. Online articles even stated that “In fact, I’ve had reporters tell me that family members told them a month or two after the execution that they regretted having been involved in the process”(Voltz). An execution very rarely provides closure for the family, violence doesn't make people feel any better or help them grieve. It just fills them with rage and anger and all the wrong emotions. We need to learn to let it go, not hold on with anger and resentment. Or even worse.. Guilt knowing you wanted someone to
“How the Death Penalty Saves Lives” According to DPIC (Death penalty information center), there are one thousand –four hundred thirty- eight executions in the United States since 1976. Currently, there are Two thousand –nine hundred –five inmates on death row, and the average length of time on death row is about fifteen years in the United States. The Capital punishment, which appears on the surface to the fitting conclusion to the life of a murder, in fact, a complicated issue that produces no clear resolution.; However, the article states it’s justice. In the article “How the Death Penalty Saves Lives” an author David B. Muhlhausen illustrates a story of Earl Ringo , Jr, brutal murder’s execution on September ,10,
In the movie Dead Man Walking, Earl Delacroix, the father of a murder victim, is seen at the funeral of the murderer, Matthew Poncelet, after his execution. While there, he says that he hasn’t found the peace he thought he would have after Matthew was executed and that his heart was still filled with hatred (Dead Man Walking.) This is the case for many families, capital punishment may give the impression that the murder victim’s family gains closure from the execution of the murderer, but that is rarely the case; even years after the execution has taken place, some family members of the victim suffer from unresolved grief and the murderer’s family is also affected in a negative manner. Capital Punishment is often viewed as the “right” option to put the families out of their pain and suffering, but in many cases, it’s just not effective in providing closure for the families and might make things worse; therefore, it should not be a valid reason for execution.
The amount of grief a family has to suffer when a loved one is lost is tremendous, and to have to go through life worrying whether or not you are safe because you are afraid the killer will get out of jail with good behavior. Sure, there are some people who cannot get out, but there is still the fear they could escape. I am sure, even though the family does not normally believe in capital punishment, they will feel relieved when the killer is dead. I know I would, too. I'm sure you all probably think I'm a monster by now, but think about it.
Too often times, innocent lives have been wasted away through racial prejudice and societal bias. Innocent suspects of murders that capture media attention are often unlucky targets for capital punishment whose system is initially flawed. Statistics show that for every seven people sent to death row, one is innocent. Innocent lives have been wasted in prison because the case wasn’t thoroughly investigated; because the defendant wasn’t able to afford a competent legal representation; because the wisest and most experienced judges weren’t the ones making the decisions. This, coupled with the fact that society can never be free from racial prejudice and bias, makes correctly judging a capital punishment case extremely difficult.
Since 1973 there have been a total number of one-hundred and fifty-one death row executions. (10 Reasons…, 1). Out of all of these executions only eighteen of them have ever had any further evidence to show that the guilty party was innocent. Many people argue that this is enough to make it to where the death penalty should not be used. However, that leaves one-hundred and thirty-three death row executions that have not been proven to have been the wrong person. If each individual that is sentenced to be executed has killed only one person than that is one-hundred and thirty-three people that have been killed. The fact remains that if there were no death penalty executions then there would be one-hundred and fifty-one people that have not been justified by their death. Although having eighteen innocent people put to death because they were wrongfully accused is a terrible thing, it does not even begin to oppose the one-hundred and fifty-one people that were killed because of the hate and fear that causes a person to bring this harm upon other people. Also many of these people have affected more than just one person. They may have killed or harmed multiple people. The people who oppose this are simply stating that the murderers’ lives are worth more than the people that they killed.
The first argument is based on morality. One has an obligation the victims’ families so that they can have a sense of closure. Unfortunately, the murderer has deprived the victim’s family and friends of a loved one. Their grief begins with the murder. It may not end with the murderer’s execution, but the execution does bring about a feeling of relief at no longer having to think about the ordeal—a feeling which often fails to arise while the murderer still lives on. A system in place for the purpose of granting justice cannot do so for the surviving victims, unless the murderer himself is put to death. The victim's family can feel traumatized knowing that the perpetrator is still alive. Although the victim and the victim's family cannot be restored to the status which preceded the murder, at least an execution brings closu...
Capital punishment does not represent justice, but vengeance and hate. Among the 7,000 people estimated to have been killed in the United States between 1900 and 1985, at least 23 were innocent (Finnerty 18). In at least 8 of 261 executions performed since 1976, something went wrong; for example, the executioner couldn't find a good vein, or the first jolt of electricity failed to do the trick (Finnerty 18). An innocent person, let alone 23 that were wrongfully executed, might seem insignificant to one. Just for a moment, think if that one person was your brother or father, and they were innocent!
... execute should not be made lightly, and tests should be done to ensure the right person is being punished for the crime that was committed. Taking away the person’s life who is responsible for the death of another person cannot bring the victim back and does not solve anything. Various people all over the world believe that the death penalty should not be supported and that it should be abolished. Many reasons exist for the abolition of the death penalty to take place including cost issues, religious issues, whether or not it acts as a deterrent, executing innocents and the harshness of the execution. Some may say the people who committed the most heinous crimes deserve to have justice served to them. However, even murderers are humans and should be treated fairly and justly. All people, even the guilty have a right to live; regardless of the crimes they committed.
It has been demonstrated the one in seven people, or fourteen percent, who are put on death row were innocent of their convicted crimes. The American society is outraged when an innocent person is killed, the fourteen percent would not have to suffer if the death penalty was illegal throughout the country. There is no way to tell how the more one thousand people, possibly more, executed since 1976 may also have been innocent, courts do not generally entertain claims of innocence when the defendant is dead. Wrongful convictions and executions can be made from many of the following factors: mistaken eyewitness testimony, faulty forensic science, fabricated testimony or testimony from jailhouse informants, grossly incompetent lawyers, false confessions, police or prosecutorial misconduct and racial bias. Many of the people who are resentenced from death to life imprisonment may be innocent and rotting behind bars, since without the imminent threat of death, no one will take up their case to exonerate them. Along with the con of the death of innocent people, the elimination of the death penalty proves as a more effective way to deter
“Since the reinstatement of the death penalty in the United States in 1976, 138 innocent men and women have been released from the death row, including some who came within minutes of execution. In Missouri, Texas and Virginia investigations have been opened to determine if those states executed innocent men. To execute an innocent person is morally reprehensible; this risk we cannot
but my research shows that faced with death, many prisoners finally express remorse and experience true spiritual feelings. Many against the death penalty say that the death of a killer is not justice or closure for a grieving family, it is revenge. I disagree, I trust that capital punishment is closure for the families of those lost. A grieving son of a father who was brutally murdered said ‘my father was in a café when a stranger slit his throat.
For the victim, or the victim’s family, they would be able to come to a place of closure knowing that the trauma they had just gone through will no longer be a problem. However, the family members would have to deal with the consequences of pursuing the death penalty. They would also still have to grieve, and deal with the trauma they went through, but it would be lot harder to move on knowing the convicted criminal is still alive. The family members of the convicted criminal to be executed will be upset about the outcome, but they would more then likely be upset about their loved one being involved in the first place.
Retribution is a justification for punishment and not a theory about substantive criminal law. But what justifies also limits. Retribution offers solid moral bases for opposing overcriminalization. Retribution is the type of punishment that indicating the vengeance or revenge. It is the idea of an ‘eye for an eye’ or ‘tooth for a tooth’ basis. The punishments given are for the response to the offender to the crime that he had done. For example, the death penalty to the crime of murder. It is a form of ‘striking back’ . Basically, there are two rationales in this theory of punishment are first, for the victims or their relatives in the case of death, that the state represent for their dissatisfaction towards the offender. Besides, this also protect from they having private retaliation to the offender. Second, is for the public at large that the public has a need for revenge. Punishment is considered an expression of justified anger by the victim due to the violation of trust demanded by society .
These people were executed cruelly by capital punishment in countries all over the globe. 970 of these people were women and children. They are all children. The countries allowing this barbaric method of punishment to happen have probably never thought about this scheme of punishment is actually successful in the deterring of crime. I have many reasons for arguing against capital punishment.
English philosopher, Sir Francis Bacon once stated, “revenge proves its own executioner.” If you were to have killed an individual and now someone is trying to kill you as revenge, both of you would have committed a crime and not only ruined your own lives, but your family as well. There have been opposing arguments as to whether revenge can be justified or is it considered misguided. Although it may be impossible to experience hostile emotions in the moment you are feeling ridiculed, cheated, or betrayed upon sufficient self- control, an individual can calm oneself in order to avoid reactive rage. Vengeance is a basic tool of human interest whether society chooses to accept or bind itself to the fact, it is an indisputable truth.