Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Daniel J. Solve why privacy matters even if you have nothing to hide
Essay on the importance of privacy
Daniel J. Solve why privacy matters even if you have nothing to hide
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
On September 11, 2001, the United States was attacked by a group of Islamic terrorists who hijacked four airplanes and carried out three simultaneous suicide attacks against the Pentagon and the World Trade Center. As a result of the multiple crimes, the United States’ government increased national security and prioritized our nation 's’ defense, often at the expense of the people’s privacy, by enacting policies like the Patriot Act (What is the USA Patriot Web 2011). This left personal emails, text messages, internet history, and personal belongings exposed to the government. Although the government reduced the public’s rights to privacy, it is a necessary step to ensure national safety and security. What made the 9/11 attacks so different …show more content…
Despite this many historians believed the preventive measures were necessary in order to keep the United States safe from any further attacks. For example Jim Livingston stated, “When you go to the airport, when you go anywhere, you know security is much tighter. It’s a problem. It’s a hassle. But it’s something I think we have to go through now” ( Historians Discuss What’s Changed 2011), and Allen R. Millett agreed that the extra security measures would give the United States a way to become stronger in both defense and offense, “The United States remains a target-of-choice, but it is a more alert, more dangerous target” (Reflections on 9/11 2011). Although most historians tend to agree with the priority security has in the U.S., some still disagree with the new policies. For instance, Louis Lipinski believes that security and privacy should be of equal priority and 9/11 seemed to destroy the balance the country had, “There are a lot of things and civil liberties that were taken away from us, and I don’t think they’ll ever come back. I think some of them were necessary but some of them were not. And I think that there’s – I don’t think there’s a healthy balance.”( Historians Discuss What’s Changed 2011). Despite the disagreement, historian Lillian McDonald is neutral and sees the United States as having minimal changes post 9/11, “I don’t think it changed …show more content…
However, this article came from The Washington Post and focused on the attacks on the Pentagon rather than the Twin Towers. Once again the article describes the attacks as being the worst attack in American History, “ It was the most dramatic attack on American soil since Pearl Harbor, and it created indelible scenes of carnage and chaos” (Terrorists Hijack 4 Airliners 2001). I wanted this article since many articles I researched mentioned the Pentagon attack only briefly or not at all, I needed coverage on all areas where the hijacked planes hit buildings, in order to get a better picture of the people’s emotions at the
Edward Snowden is America’s most recent controversial figure. People can’t decide if he is their hero or traitor. Nevertheless, his leaks on the U.S. government surveillance program, PRISM, demand an explanation. Many American citizens have been enraged by the thought of the government tracing their telecommunication systems. According to factbrowser.com 54% of internet users would rather have more online privacy, even at the risk of security (Facts Tagged with Privacy). They say it is an infringement on their privacy rights of the constitution. However, some of them don’t mind; they believe it will help thwart the acts of terrorists. Both sides make a good point, but the inevitable future is one where the government is adapting as technology is changing. In order for us to continue living in the new digital decade, we must accept the government’s ability to surveil us.
The 9/11 attack changed America in ways that made limits on our freedom and privacy seem better than the alternative. On September 11, 2001, “...our fellow citizens, our way of life, our very freedom came under attack in a series of deliberate and deadly terrorist attacks,” President George W. Bush stated in a public address shortly after the attacks. He also stated, “Today, our nation saw evil – the very worst of human nature – and we responded with the very best of America,” to calm fears ...
Since the terrorist attacks at Sept. 11, 2001, the surveillance issue often has turned away the table in the debate of individual privacy or counterterrorism. By passing the Patriot Act, Congress gave President Bush an immense law enforcement authority to boost U.S's counterterrorism, and the President used his enlarged powers to forward specific programs in order to reduce the threat of terrorism and defend the country’s safety.
The USA PATRIOT Act is an Act of Congress that was signed into law by President George W. Bush on October 26, 2001. Its title is a ten-letter acronym (USA PATRIOT) that stands for "Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001. After the attacks on the Twin Towers and the Pentagon the United States has developed mitigation controls to decrease the risk of these reoccurring. One of these mitigation controls is the USA Patriot Act. The Patriot Act’s purpose is to combat future acts of terrorism against the United States. Though its intentions are to prevent destruction of the United States; the access of personal information is causing an out roar throughout the country with questions of moral and ethical rights. When the Patriot Act was first signed into law, there was a surprising lack of objections regarding the effect the radical provisions would have on our society. The short time period in which the bill was written,
Airport security is a big issue today because many people talk down on it when story after story, it is made to protect the people. Kip Hawley acknowledges that airport security has become so bureaucratic and disconnected from the people for which it is meant to protect for over a decade after 9/11 (Hawley). So why isn’t TSA taking the public’s opinions into consideration? TSA hears over thousands of complaints on a daily about their “stupid security checkpoints” or their “lazy employees”. The thing is, if airports were to improve their security staff, then less people would attempt to bring dangerous items onto the plane. If airports were to have dogs that are trained to smell toxic liquid, that would fix solutions quickly. TSA depends solely on their scanners too much. Ed Hewitt argues that TSA needs to fix the sloppiness and uncaring employees
Citizens feeling protected in their own nation is a crucial factor for the development and advancement of that nation. The United States’ government has been able to provide this service for a small tax and for the most part it is money well spent. Due to events leading up to the terrifying attacks on September 11, 2001 and following these attacks, the Unites States’ government has begun enacting certain laws and regulations that ensure the safety of its citizens. From the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) of 1978 to the most recent National Security Agency scandal, the government has attempted and for the most part succeeded in keeping domestic safety under control. Making sure that the balance between obtaining enough intelligence to protect the safety of the nation and the preservation of basic human rights is not extremely skewed, Congress has set forth requisites in FISA which aim to balance the conflicting goals of privacy and security; but the timeline preceding this act has been anything but honorable for the United States government.
The government’s use of surveillance and metadata collection has greatly increased since the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001. Many Americans feel that this increase in surveillance is violating their privacy rights and the Constitution. The government can, and should, do everything it can to protect the lives and freedoms of its citizens. The National Security Agency is not violating the Constitution by electronically collecting information from American citizens, and the data collection is necessary to keep Americans safe by preventing future terrorist attacks. Many Americans are uncomfortable with the fact that the government can access their personal phone records and other electronic information, but some privacy needs to be sacrificed to save the lives of others.
The attacks on American soil that solemn day of September 11, 2001, ignited a quarrel that the grade of singular privacy, need not be given away in the hunt of grander security. The security measures in place were planned to protect our democracy and its liberties yet, they are merely eroding the very existence with the start of a socialistic paradigm. Benjamin Franklin (1759), warned more than two centuries ago: “they that can give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” Implementing security measures comes at a cost both economically and socially. Government bureaucrats can and will utilize information for personal political objectives. The Supreme Court is the final arbitrator of what the ‘law is”, causing a lack of circulated rule. The actual leaders with political purposes jeopardize our individual privacy rights, liberties, and freedoms.
After 9/11, the government has worked to improve and be more secure in order to prevent another attack from happening. With the battle between protection and privacy, there are already other forms that are happening. For instance, the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) agents at airports are allowed to confiscate your belonging, look through your bags, scan your body and bags, and physically touch you. This form of monitoring is physical and just because everyone is searched does not mean that you are a bad person and they are targeting you. Same exact thing with online monitoring, it is not because the NSA does not trust its own people, it is simply a procedure that has to be done in order to provide us safety. These procedures have been a result of 9/11 and it must be reminded that it is all for the protection of all Americans. This is all vital for the safety of Americans because although many are not terrorist these bad people may be among us and they must be identified in order to track them. Most recently, the San Bernardino Attack which took place on December 2, 2015 is claimed to be the deadliest attack since 9/11. Syed Farook, one of the attackers was born and raised in the United States, this is very alarming because terrorist can even be Americans themselves. In “San Bernardino attackers 'did not post about jihad on social media’ ” the FBI Director James Comey mentions “Instead they expressed support for martyrdom using "private direct messages”." The San Bernardino Attackers did not show on their public social media profiles any links to the support of Islam or any suspicious activity but between then they talked about it privately, that is where the whole situation could have been prevented. Another tragic attack was the Boston Marathon attack “Since his death, it
In the modern era technological breakthroughs have shaped how we socialize with one another, do school work, and even cook. This is a great thing for many people as they can easily access information about anyone or anything that they want to know about. However, since the 9/11 attacks the Government has been able to help foil many potential terrorist attacks by using the information that you store online. Many people believe that having the Government being able to access that information is wrong, although in order to help protect the general public, law agencies must be able to access this as; the information on the internet is stored online which makes it not your private information and
“These events – and the doubts they inspired – have contributed to a cloud of personal “data insecurity” that now looms over many Americans’ daily decisions and activities” (Rainie) While people use the internet to play games, book appointments, and simply just search the web, they know they are not doing anything wrong but still fear the government will look at something they did as something wrong or alarming. The government hoards information of people’s internet and phone activity but this makes people uneasy even knowing they are not doing anything wrong they fear of one mistake and getting in trouble. “A federal appeals court recently ruled that a National Security Agency program that collects Americans’ phone records is illegal” (Maiden and Rainie). Although, this appeal was soon turned down at one point they were collecting information illegally from us. Knowing this information leaves the country uneasy about if the government is doing things correctly and not going against our rights as
A major reason the U.S. needs to increase restrictions on the type and amount of data collected on individuals from the internet is due to the fact that the United States government can track communications and browsing histories of private citizens without warrant or cause. After the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, ...
Fearing the potential threat of an Orwellian dystopia, many people are having second thoughts about the government’s surveillance programs to thwart terrorism. Although the practice of surveillance by the National Security Agency (NSA) and PRISM has halted potential terrorist attacks, American citizens have recently learned in the summer of 2013 that their individual lives are no longer private. The United States Government is covertly tracking text messages, telephone conversations, web communications, online purchases, and locations of individuals all over the world. With programs like NSA and PRISM, these networks of surveillance programs are only a small portion of the largest surveillance system in history. Through this system, the government can acquire information, such as where people have traveled, their current location, and where they plan to go, under total secrecy. These programs were brought to light when former NSA employee, Edward Snowden, disclosed documents depicting the large-scale data collection. Altogether, surveillance is a crucial aspect of modern society, but with privacy intrusions, covert data collection, deficient restrictions, and lack of transparency, it can be more detrimental than beneficial.
“Flight 208 to Los Angeles is now boarding. Section N you may now take your seats”. You looked down at your carry-on bag to make sure you have everything packed up, even though you took nothing out, and headed toward the flight attendant and handed her your ticket. As your walking through the tunnel, the sound of the planes jets put just enough pressure on your body, causing your pulse to increase. “Why are you nervous, you been on planes before”, you ask yourself. You shake your head and start to inhale and before you could finish getting your lungs to the maximum capacity they could hold, a man wearing a white shirt twice his size and jeans that also seemed
After 9/11, the fear of terrorism in Americans has increased. Americans are afraid of any suspicious activity involving a middle-eastern individual. The paranoia has increased to the point where we tend to fear our own government. The United States government’s collection of personal data causes people to feel insecure and exposed. Americans are anxious because of the wounds that terrorism has inflicted upon us; because of this we are in need of a government that will make us feel secure.