Reader! It has come to my attention that the human world has been thrown into major conflicts surrounding the ethics of restoring the function of the face, using microsurgery, to those with severe disfigurements (Lamparello). This revolution of the science that led to my creation has almost rendered me speechless! No longer will patients feel hideous in their own skin because of unforeseen circumstances. Oh, how it is a horrid life to live, to be unaccepted by your fellow man, no matter how much YOU try and assimilate! Facial reconstruction is an innovative process that can improve the self-confidence of those whom were born naturally disfigured or were disfigured later in their lifetime. Face transplantation implores my interest simply because of how close it pounds at my wretched heart. When I escaped to a land far from the accursed laboratory I was “born” in, I found documents belonging to my creator that detailed his disgusted thoughts during my creation and final “birth”. It was exceptionally difficult to study his horror-stricken account of my hideous appearance (Shelley 34). When he’d lain his eyes on his obsession for the first time, he promptly disregarded his previous claims of my …show more content…
beauty! He hated me upon sight and single-handedly predicted the response I received by every “perfect” human I encountered! So, unlike you, perfect specimen, I know first-hand the emotional toll that comes with not considering yourself normal. With just how mighty this emotional toll that affects anyone not considered normal, there is no ethical argument to discourage the acceptance of this innovation. Ethics experts might argue that this innovation uses and abuses the medical techniques that enhance but don’t save lives (Powell). I say, YOU are in the wrong. In a less threatening tone, I am content to reason with you. Upon developing a logical standpoint, these experts are in the right frame of mind. Although these opinions are as cold and heartless as I am, to a utilitarian, the choice that yields the greatest benefit to the most people is the choice that is ethically correct (Rainbow). Still, employing a branch of off consequentialism in this argument, welfarism, we are almost deadlocked. Welfarism is based on the premise that actions, policies, and/or rules should be evaluated on the basis of their consequences. Ask, sir or madam, what is the ethics of choosing to save money over choosing to spend money. In the long term, saving money benefits you greatly. Applying this concept to our current situation, reconstructing a near-normal face for someone who is disfigured, benefits the patient in the long run because they can now insert themselves and benefit to society without constantly being reminded of their fiendish appearance. A task I tried but failed to accomplish. In order to even suggest a new technological superpower to society, it must be evaluated on the basis of Hippocratic’s oath, an oath historically taken by physicians (Rainbow). The oath, in simple terms, is to do no harm. Face transplantation, if conducted correctly, has no way causing harm to the patient or anyone else (Siemionow). I am earnest because I am miserable. Am I not shunned and hated by all mankind? Frankenstein, my creator, would tear me to pieces and grin in joy; tell me why I should not pity the wandering devils like me more than he pities me? God’s petty creations, humans, do not consider me one of them. Even you, reader, would not call it murder if you my creator should purposefully defeat my peaceful efforts! Imagine the hollow feeling in my chest, as I looked through the peephole in my tiny hovel. I saw those with perfect features of who would shun and beat me, laughing and frolicking happily together. I am not unlike those who yearn for face transplants. Like me, they wish to look like those around them, however unlike I, they now have the means to achieve their dreams. Shall I and they respect man’s ideas when he condemns us? The media often ties the lives of these face transplant patients to my own tragic story (Powell).
Many of this society’s beings regard the physicians that conduct these procedures to my own creator, Dr. Frankenstein. NO ONE will be as disgusting as own daemonic creator. He created me out of obsession. He had a thirst to play with the line of ethical science to create his own being. Dr. Frankenstein was supposed to love and nurture his wretched creation, but he abandoned me as soon as he saw thee. To think I had almost forgiven that mad scientist. I told him to make me a wife, so I would have the Eve to Adam. He accepted and led me to think he was working hard just to make me happy and keep me away from mankind. I was benevolent and good. Misery made me a fiend (Shelley
66-69). When I heavily studied this recent innovation, I seldom expected this reception. All men hate the wretched, correct. Remembering my creator’s judgements and those humans I encountered, I had figured humans would jump at the chance to beautify the non-normal. Yet, I was wrong. Have we not suffered enough that you seek to increase our misery by not giving us this chance? Life among society, although I’ve never been given a taste of it, is dear to me, and I will defend it. Face transplantation is a chance to live among God’s other creations in harmony. You may bring up ethical arguments against me, dear reader, however I have used your own strategy disprove your argument. Face transplantation is an amazing innovation for those who were not born “normal” or were tragically disfigured.
“Why do You Call it Plastic Surgery?” Fighting Ignorance since 1973. Web. 14 March 2014.
In today society, beauty in a woman seems to be the measured of her size, or the structure of her nose and lips. Plastic surgery has become a popular procedure for people, mostly for women, to fit in social class, race, or beauty. Most women are insecure about their body or face, wondering if they are perfect enough for the society to call the beautiful; this is when cosmetic surgery comes in. To fix what “needed” to be fixed. To begin with, there is no point in cutting your face or your body to add or remove something most people call ugly. “The Pitfalls of Plastic Surgery” explored the desire of human to become beyond perfection by the undergoing plastic surgery. The author, Camille Pagalia, took a look how now days how Americans are so obsessed
There have been numerous debates all around the globe as to whether or not the practice of euthanasia is ethical or unethical. People who are in pain and suffering are more likely to have pro-euthanasia. Those who never have to feel that level of pain and suffering that would drive a person to want to end their lives could never understand a person’s reason for considering this option. Fictional characters are used to express human suffering, such as those found in Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein. There are several modern themes such as genetic engineering, cloning, the treatment of outcasts and playing God highlighted in Shelley’s book, however the focus of this paper is on the less common theme of euthanasia involving the main character Dr. Victor Frankenstein.
Horrified and regretful of his creation, Frankenstein becomes overwhelmed by thoughts of depression and guilt. Previously, while working as a scientist and before his creation, he had “possessed a coolness of judgment that fitted me for illustrious achievements.” But once terrorized by the consequences that were to come with his creation, “this thought...now serves only to plunge me lower than the dust.” Frankenstein, who once was so enthralled with science that it dominated every facet of his life, now wanted nothing to do with it. Similarly, the Creature was brought into the world with high hopes: “once my fancy was soothed with dreams of virtue...I falsely hoped to meet with beings who, pardoning my outward form, would love me for the excellent qualities which I was capable of
In today’s world of genetically engineered hearts and genetically altered glowing rats, the story of Frankenstein, by Mary Shelley, seems as if it could be seen in the newspapers in our near future. The discoveries seen in modern science, as well as in the novel, often have controversy and negative consequences that follow them, the biggest of which being the responsibility the creator of life has to what has been created. Victor Frankenstein suffers from a variety of internal and external conflicts stemming from the creation of his monster, which in return also experiences similar problems. Shelley uses these tumultuous issues to portray the discrepancies between right and wrong, particularly through romanticism and the knowledge of science.
With the cloning of life forms and genetic engineering now commonplace, the question of the morality of the actions of Dr. Frankenstein is now more important than ever. Perhaps the novel Frankenstein contains lessons that can be applied in today’s technologically advanced world. It was Dr. Victor Frankenstein's opinion that it was morally acceptable to give life to his creation. Frankenstein's creation then needed a companion. Knowing that his first creation was evil, should the doctor make a second? Even with the knowledge at hand Dr. Frankenstein decides that it is not at all morally correct to bring another monster into the world.
5 Reasons You Should Be Getting Botox Wrinkles are not unavoidable; they are not a necessary part of aging. Some look to wrinkles as a sign of aged wisdom, but most men and women do not look forward to them. In fact, they are considered an unwelcome and distressful part of the aging process. For many years now, Botox has been available to treat these distasteful telling signs of our years on earth. Today, more people than ever are not only using Botox to treat wrinkles but to prevent them as well.
Much of the analysis of the consequences that the scientific perversion of nature harbors is manifested by the inner struggle within both Dr. Frankenstein and his monster. The tortured mind of the creator expresses the notion that one who plays god will be burdened by the excruciating pain of loneliness and uttermost guilt weighing down upon his mind and his creation. Throughout Dr. Frankenstein's struggle, he is overwhelmed by fear, hatred, regret and his culpability in interfering with nature: "a weight of despair and remorse pressed on my heart, which nothing could remove. Sleep fled from my eyes; I wandered like an evil spirit, for I had committed deeds of mischief beyond description horrible" (Shelly 59). Since such sentiments are all expressed in the first person, it allows the reader to more closely sympathize with his pain and moreover makes the message all the more accessible. These themes are not solely portrayed by the doctor, for the sorrow harbored by his creation outweigh even those of his grief-stricken creator.
Marcus, Steven. "Frankenstein: myths of scientific and medical knowledge and stories of human relations." The Southern Review 38.1 (2002): 188+. Literature Resource Center. Web. 9 Jan. 2015.
Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, or the Modern Prometheus, explores the monstrous and destructive affects of obsession, guilt, fate, and man’s attempt to control nature. Victor Frankenstein, the novel’s protagonist and antihero, attempts to transcend the barriers of scientific knowledge and application in creating a life. His determination in bringing to life a dead body consequently renders him ill, both mentally and physically. His endeavors alone consume all his time and effort until he becomes fixated on his success. The reason for his success is perhaps to be considered the greatest scientist ever known, but in his obsessive toil, he loses sight of the ethical motivation of science. His production would ultimately grieve him throughout his life, and the consequences of his undertaking would prove disastrous and deadly. Frankenstein illustrates the creation of a monster both literally and figuratively, and sheds light on the dangers of man’s desire to play God.
“Individuals are encouraged, even expected to make ‘lifestyle’ choices to maximize their life chance and simultaneously held responsible for managing and minimizing the risk associated with these decisions” (Leve, 2012:124). Media discourse is part of everyone’s day to day life, ideals of bodies are shown in all these media communication’s in order to appeal to the consumer. This could be considered to have made society become obsessed by looks, meaning that individuals feel the pressures to keep up with how people are represented in the media, for example recognized celebrities in magazines. According to The British Association of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, or BAAPS, there was a 16.5 percent increase of procedures in 2012. These statistics show that cosmetic surgery is becoming normalized, “This is how we live now. Anything that makes us feel better about our appearance, whether it involves needles, knives or acid, is acceptable’ (Wiseman, 2012)
First and foremost, addressing the use of cosmetic or, in this sense more aptly, aesthetic surgery for restoration and reparation of human anatomy damaged by unfortunate incidents, it is common to come to a consensus where people are agreeable to the sur...
When I was brought into this world, on a dreary November night, I did not know it at the time, but I was immediately abandoned. Victor Frankenstein created me in his image, yet he found me vulgar. He used the finest parts of man he could find to create me, yet he found me inhuman. I was supposed to be beautiful, but indeed I am wretched. When I finally had the compacity to think and feel, I learned that no one in this world would ever sympathize with someone as gory as me.
Some people have decided that plastic surgery may help improve someones mental health and therefore should be included in health care insurance, I think this is just absurd. I am all for the improvement of mental health care considering it is very lacking in this country but I also think that until there is more proof to this argument we should not include it in everyones medical insurance fees. America is having a crises when it comes to mental health care and already doesn't include mental health care in many insurance policies as it is and this far fetched idea may not be a good thing to add in for the general public until we have more evidence to support this topic. However, I don't think general cosmetic surgery should be allowed, I do see the benefit of other "cosmetic" surgeries such as gender reassignment surgery which I feel these are less cosmetic and more geared towards mental health.Basically, I generally disagree with the idea that cosmetic
Some people’s obsession with plastic surgery is obviously getting out of control. It starts with only getting one thing fixed or corrected but then quickly escalates and before you know it, a face that once was all-flesh turns into plastic. According to a study conducted by Nigel Mercer (2009), “The number of official cosmetic surgeries has more than tripled to 34,000 since 2003”. The two reasons why plastic surgery should be banned are because of its high health risks, and because of the additional pressure it puts on people to look picture-perfect.