Persuasive Analysis

1015 Words3 Pages

Melanie Scruggs recently wrote an article titled “Cost will be too great if Houston doesn’t recycle” about the dangers that Houston may face if they continue to put recycling as a last priority. I believe that Melanie Scruggs does an amazing job describing the issues that we are facing and poses an effective argument on why we should recycle. Melanie Scruggs graduated from the University of Texas at Austin, and she was awarded with a Plan 11 Honors degree. (TCE 1) Melanie then joined the TCE in 2012 and she served as a organizer, field manager, program staff member, and a program director. Melanie then moved back to Houston around 2013 where she now serves on the board of the Houston Clean City Commission, the League of Women Voters, as well
I also believe that Scruggs has a clear claim in which she states that if the city of Houston fails to recycle effectively it will end up costing Houstonians more, due to pollution and waste of energy. Scruggs supports her claim by reasoning that recycling allows humans to safely get rid of waste without emitting poisonous gasses into the air, as well as saving our water from pollution that landfills may cause. She also gives grounds to support her claim by stating that landfills are inconvenient because they cause pollution and cost lots of money to maintain, as well as saying that if we recycled more and created products out of recycled material we would be able to save energy and reduce pollution effectively. I believe that Scruggs’s reason is audience based because her reason gives the impression that she cares for the greater good of the audience. Although I do believe that Scrugg’s argument addresses her audience I do not believe that she answers questions that may oppose her argument because she seems to just continue to justify her
I do have my doubts as well because Scruggs does not address the opposing argument. I believe that Scrugg’s character is extremely important in her argument because many people write about recycling but have no experience on what they are writing about, but Scruggs is involved in many committees that have to do with recycling, and she is educated on the topic as well. I also believe that Scruggs does not rely on pathos in her argument and instead relies on logic. In conclusion I believe that Melanie Scruggs uses many different approaches such as logos, and ethos to effectively persuade her audience to believe that she is in fact correct about recycling, and landfills. Although Scruggs fails to apply pathos, and address her opposing argument I believe her argument is still

Open Document