Persuasion In Julius Caesar

1598 Words4 Pages

In Shakespeare’s, Julius Caesar, he portrays the conflict man vs self by informing people that it is human nature to make decisions based on other people’s points of view. He does this by using rhetoric, logos, and pathos to make one character or group persuaded by a single person or multiple people. Persuasion is used throughout the novel to entice a character to agree with another character. For example, Brutus does not want to kill Caesar, even though he does not want him to become king, but his other friends attempt to persuade him into believing that murdering one of his closest comrades is a fabulous idea. Brutus tries to convince the conspirators why killing Caesar is wrong as well. Also, the fickle Roman Public are easily induced by …show more content…

For example, Brutus wants to protect the Roman Republic, just like his ancestors, but he does not believe killing Caesar will help him become closer to his goal of saving Rome like his friends think. The plotters are longing for Brutus to join them before Caesar obtains too much power because they are convinced he will turn against Rome. Brutus believes Caesar will always remain loyal to his hometown because he has done so much for it and the people. As Brutus talks to himself, he realizes that he knows “no personal cause to spurn at him” (II.1.11). Even though his “friends” want him to help kill the ruler, he has no reason to put an end to his life because Caesar has done nothing wrong. Brutus is torn whether or not to stab Caesar, and he mentions how this decision has kept him awake all night. Brutus also uses his persuasion skills on the conspirators so they do not totally “destroy” Caesar. For instance, Cassius suggests the idea to cut off Caesar’s head, arms, and legs, and to kill Antony right near Caesar. Brutus suddenly comes up with excuses on why chopping Caesar up and only stabbing Antony will seem suspicious to the public. It will seem as if they are killing Caesar out of anger and Antony out of envy. Brutus has no purpose in killing Caesar, but he tells the group that killing both of them boldly and not wrathfully will “make our purpose necessary and not …show more content…

For example, Caesar tries to persuade Antony that Cassius is very dangerous to be around because he is too thin, and he thinks too much. To Caesar, Cassius’ appearance shows that he is not comfortable with what he has, and he can turn the tables at any moment. Caesar tells Antony that Cassius has a “lean and hungry look” (I.2.204), but Antony does not see anything wrong with him because he believes Cassius is a noble Roman. To Caesar, such men are dangerous because they are always thinking about revenge, and they are always hungry to get someone back. Since Antony does not believe Caesar’s claims, Caesar stops worrying about Cassius as well because he realizes he is not able to persuade Antony to agree with him. This event is foreshadowing Caesar’s murder, and is ironic because Cassius is the leader of the plot to murder him. For instance, this is ironic that Antony does not think Cassius is dangerous because Cassius not only wants to assassinate Caesar, but he persuades the conspirators to attack Antony as well. Cassius says that he fears Antony “for the engrafted love he bears to Caesar” (II.1.198). If Caesar does not listen to Antony’s opinion of Cassius not being dangerous, he can prevent his murder. Just like in real life, what Shakespeare is trying to say is, that it is normal to second guess yourself because somebody thinks differently. As Caesar is trying to persuade Antony that

Open Document