Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Final reflection on personality tests
Final reflection on personality tests
Final reflection on personality tests
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Final reflection on personality tests
Sarason (2014) defines a personality assessment as a measurement of personality characteristics, which is used to objectively seek and measure individual’s traits, and relate them to social aspects of behaviour. Many standard personality tests are considered cross-culturally competent, thus appropriate to analyse and interpret Indigenous people behaviour. Although, many standard personality tests remain inappropriate as they are invalid and unreliable. This literature review will examine the validity, reliability, cross- cultural application and appropriateness of standard personality tests for Indigenous people by referring to the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory- 2 (MMPI-2), as it is known as a widely used and internationally adapted personality test (Butcher, Derksen, Sloore & Sirigatti, 2003). It will outline the importance of translation of standard personality tests and the implementation of equivalent test measures. It will discuss the inappropriateness of the MMPI-2 when testing Indigenous people and explains the impact of method bias. It will outline and discuss appropriate personality test formats for Indigenous people. In addition it will demonstrate the inappropriateness of some MMPI-2 scales that reflect Western cultural norms.
According to Mushquash and Bova (2007) problems may arise when measurement instruments are applied to minority groups that have been developed by a dominant group. To ensure appropriate personality tests, it is vital that instruments are adapted to consider all ethnic cognitive development and ability. Butcher (2004) outlines that effective translated and adapted personality assessments should clearly demonstrate external validity and reliability. In addition research must be carrie...
... middle of paper ...
... bias must be removed from personality tests and test formats must be culturally sensitive for Indigenous people to increase the appropriateness of measurements. Although the MMPI-2 is considered to be a widely used and internationally adapted personality test, research has concluded that the MMPI-2 continues to be inappropriate for testing Indigenous people. This is due to inappropriate scales that focus on Western cultural norms, therefore it is important that the MMPI-2 is revised to develop new norms for the instrument and ensure that the scales are cross-culturally adapted. This will then increase the appropriateness of cross-cultural sensitive personality tests that enable valid and reliable measurements. Therefore valid and reliable measurements of standard personality tests will ensure accurate interpretation and understanding of Indigenous people behaviour.
A notable strength of the MACI inventory is the ease of it all. The tests consist of true or false questions, it is only 20-30 minutes long, and it provides easy and comprehendible assessment question suitable for the age group. A noteworthy weakness, however, is that the MACI inventory is its method of comparing adolescents to a particular population rather a norming population; it limits the amount of more useful information that can be obtained. Tringone and Bockian (2015) suggest that in assessing the MACI with adolescent of differing cultural background, distinct cultural factor can affect the overall results (p. 569). Increasing the norming group would provide a more extensive, more approachable, and formative result. Despite its shortcomings, the Millon Adolescent Clinical Inventory serves its purpose in providing counselors and other trained professional working with adolescents with helpful assessment results, which ultimately helps in formulating treatment
Selby, E. A., & Joiner Jr, T. E. (2008). Ethnic variations in the structure of borderline personality
Abstract: The purpose of this article was to summarize the development process of the Synthetic Personality Inventory (SPI) in the point of view of a knowledge of psychology. The SPI came into widespread use in recruitment examinations for university students and vocational college students from the 1960s through the 1990s. There are four reasons.
Every person that has different characteristics that influence how they think, act, and build relationships. While some people are introverted, others are extroverted. Some people are strict and do not take risks, while others are carefree and free spirited. However, there are times where a person’s behavior becomes destructive, problematic, and maladaptive (Widger, 2003). The key to examining a person for a possible personality disorder is not if they have quirks, but if they display severe behavioral, emotional, and social issues. A diagnosis of having a personality disorders involves identifying if their extreme behaviors, emotions, and thoughts that are different than cultural expectations interfere with the ...
Guerin, B. & Guerin, P. 2012, 'Re-thinking mental health for indigenous Australian communities: communities as context for mental health', Community Development Journal, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 555-70.
Waller, M., (2006). Strengths of Indigenous Peoples. In D. Saleebey (Eds.), The Strengths Perspective in Social Work Practice Forth Edition (pp 148-170). Boston. Pearson Publishing.
Cervone, D., Pervin, L. A. (2008). Personality: Theory and research (10th Ed.). New York: Wiley.
Personality disorder. Encyclopedia Britannica Online Academic Edition. Encyclopedia Britannica Inc. 2014. Web. 08 Feb 2014
Due to hardships of residential schools, some indigenous people may suffer from alcohol use disorder. There is a clear stereotype in this case towards indigenous people drinking and prone to relapse.
"Personality Test Based on C. Jung and I. Briggs Myers Type Theory."Personality Test Based on C. Jung and I. Briggs Myers Type Theory. Humanmetrics, 1998. Web. 11 June 2014. .
Personality can be defined as an individual’s characteristic pattern of thinking, feeling and acting. Many personality theorists have put forward claims as to where personality is derived from and how it develops throughout an individual’s life. The two main personality theories this essay will be focusing on is the Social Cognitive Theory (SCT) (Bandura, 1986) and the Trait Theory – Five Factor Theory (FFT) (McCrae and Costa, 1995). The SCT allocates a central role to cognitive, observational learning and self-regulatory processes (Bandura, 1986). An individual’s personality develops through experiences with their sociocultural environment. Whereas the Trait Theory proposes that all individuals are predisposed with five traits (Extraversion, Openness, Conscientiousness, Agreeableness and Neuroticism) which determines our personality. This theory also puts forward that personality is stable and cannot change as it’s biologically determined.
(1997). McRae et al. (1997) attempted to find if the Five-Factor Model was a universal constant in all cultures. They also attempted to see if cultural views would change how the five traits were viewed. The researchers collected data from 6 different translations of the Revised NEO Personality Inventory, this inventory looks for universal trait dimensions in a variety of languages. These 6 translations were then compared to the American counterpart. It was found that while some cultures did differ slightly in their view of the five traits found in the Five-Factor Model in comparison to Americans, the traits were still universal. All six translations found the big five traits of extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, neuroticism and opens to experience to be
McCrae, R. R., & Allik, I. U. (2002). The five-factor model of personality across cultures. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
Friedman, H. S., & Schustack, M. W. (2012). Personality: Classic theories and modern research (5th ed). Boston , MA, USA: Pearson
Personality tests tell a person a lot about why a person is who they have become. I believe that these test if taken truthfully can identify deficiencies that individuals can work on to benefit not only themselves but others in the organizations that they work in. Some models state that it is in human nature and chemicals that decided how a person acts but I believe it is based on life experiences and a personality can change as long as a person knows the deficiencies and works to change them.